基于课程标准的中国中考英语阅读测试内容效度研究——以2017-2021年吉林省中考英语试卷为例

IF 0.1 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Cong Qi, Xiaomeng Niu
{"title":"基于课程标准的中国中考英语阅读测试内容效度研究——以2017-2021年吉林省中考英语试卷为例","authors":"Cong Qi, Xiaomeng Niu","doi":"10.17002/sil..69.202310.233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the 〈English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education〉 and Bacheman and Palmer’s task-characteristic framework, this paper adopted literature method and educational statistical method on the content validity of English reading test in Jilin Provincial High School Entrance Examination (2017-2021) from two dimensions of discourse input and expected response. The results showed that although the content validity of English reading test is high and meets the requirements of the 〈English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education〉 to a certain extent, there are still some problems in the test paper in the following five aspects: (1) the proportion of expository essay and narrative essay is relatively high, and the proportion of practical essay is the lowest; (2) the order of the texts is unreasonable; (3) on the whole, the texts are all not difficult; (4) the feature of “discourse” is not highlighted at the level of test points; (5) the examination to reading skills is not balanced. Based on the above research results, this paper provided some suggestions to the test-makers and middle school English teachers respectively.","PeriodicalId":41887,"journal":{"name":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","volume":"39 6","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Research on the Content Validity of English Reading Test in Chinese High School Entrance Examination Based on Curriculum Standards -A Case Study of English Test Papers in Jilin Provincial High School Entrance Examination (2017-2021)\",\"authors\":\"Cong Qi, Xiaomeng Niu\",\"doi\":\"10.17002/sil..69.202310.233\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Based on the 〈English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education〉 and Bacheman and Palmer’s task-characteristic framework, this paper adopted literature method and educational statistical method on the content validity of English reading test in Jilin Provincial High School Entrance Examination (2017-2021) from two dimensions of discourse input and expected response. The results showed that although the content validity of English reading test is high and meets the requirements of the 〈English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education〉 to a certain extent, there are still some problems in the test paper in the following five aspects: (1) the proportion of expository essay and narrative essay is relatively high, and the proportion of practical essay is the lowest; (2) the order of the texts is unreasonable; (3) on the whole, the texts are all not difficult; (4) the feature of “discourse” is not highlighted at the level of test points; (5) the examination to reading skills is not balanced. Based on the above research results, this paper provided some suggestions to the test-makers and middle school English teachers respectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41887,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"39 6\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..69.202310.233\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Concentric-Studies in Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17002/sil..69.202310.233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以《义务教育英语课程标准》为基础,结合Bacheman和Palmer的任务特征框架,从语篇输入和期望反应两个维度,采用文献法和教育统计学方法对吉林省中考(2017-2021)英语阅读测试的内容效度进行研究。结果表明,虽然英语阅读测试的内容效度较高,在一定程度上符合《义务教育英语课程标准》的要求,但试卷在以下五个方面仍存在一些问题:(1)说说性文章和叙事性文章比例较高,实用性文章比例最低;(二)文字顺序不合理的;(3)总体上,课文都不难;(4)考点层面“话语”特征不突出;(5)考试对阅读技能的要求不均衡。基于以上研究结果,本文分别对测试者和中学英语教师提出了一些建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Research on the Content Validity of English Reading Test in Chinese High School Entrance Examination Based on Curriculum Standards -A Case Study of English Test Papers in Jilin Provincial High School Entrance Examination (2017-2021)
Based on the 〈English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education〉 and Bacheman and Palmer’s task-characteristic framework, this paper adopted literature method and educational statistical method on the content validity of English reading test in Jilin Provincial High School Entrance Examination (2017-2021) from two dimensions of discourse input and expected response. The results showed that although the content validity of English reading test is high and meets the requirements of the 〈English Curriculum Standards for Compulsory Education〉 to a certain extent, there are still some problems in the test paper in the following five aspects: (1) the proportion of expository essay and narrative essay is relatively high, and the proportion of practical essay is the lowest; (2) the order of the texts is unreasonable; (3) on the whole, the texts are all not difficult; (4) the feature of “discourse” is not highlighted at the level of test points; (5) the examination to reading skills is not balanced. Based on the above research results, this paper provided some suggestions to the test-makers and middle school English teachers respectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics
Concentric-Studies in Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
期刊介绍: Concentric: Studies in Linguistics is a refereed, biannual journal, publishing research articles on all aspects of linguistic studies on the languages in the Asia-Pacific region. Review articles and book reviews with solid argumentation are also considered. The journal is indexed in Scopus, Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI), Modern Language Association (MLA) Directory of Periodicals, MLA International Bibliography, Linguistics & Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA), EBSCOhost, Communication & Mass Media Complete (CMMC), Airiti Library (AL), Taiwan Citation Index-Humanities and Social Sciences, and Taiwan Humanities Citation Index(THCI)-Level 1. First published in 1964 under the title,The Concentric, the journal aimed to promote academic research in the fields of linguistics and English literature, and to provide an avenue for researchers to share results of their investigations with other researchers and practitioners. Later in 1976, the journal was renamed as Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, and in 2001 was further renamed as Concentric: Studies in English Literature and Linguistics. As the quantity of research in the fields of theoretical linguistics, applied linguistics, and English literature has increased greatly in recent years, the journal has evolved into two publications. Beginning in 2004, these two journals have been published under the titles Concentric: Studies in Linguistics and Concentric: Literary and Cultural Studies respectively.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信