恒肥条件下玉米产量的增加并未减少硝酸盐的出口

IF 1.2 4区 农林科学 Q3 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Chelsea Connair Clifford, Emily R. Waring, Carl H. Pederson, Matthew J. Helmers
{"title":"恒肥条件下玉米产量的增加并未减少硝酸盐的出口","authors":"Chelsea Connair Clifford, Emily R. Waring, Carl H. Pederson, Matthew J. Helmers","doi":"10.13031/ja.15538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Highlights Corn yields increased from 1989 to 2021 in Iowa experimental plots at nitrogen fertilizer rates consistently just above current recommendations. Increased corn yields did not result in a decrease in drainage nitrate exports. Findings required long-term (>10 years) experiments and monitoring. Abstract. Aquatic problems from the export of nutrients, especially nitrate, from row crops are recalcitrant in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin and globally severe. Previous studies have proposed to reduce these problems in part by improving crop yields, particularly corn, leaving less nitrate surplus to export. Simultaneous increases in fertilizer application rates and grain yields in recent decades have made testing this notion with large-scale agricultural statistics difficult. This experiment in Iowa featured a corn-soybean rotation with corn fertilized with nitrogen at a nearly consistent rate from 1989 to 2021. Corn yields increased at a rate not statistically distinguishable from the surrounding county’s (144 vs. 148 kg ha-1 yr-1), but drainage nitrate concentration and loading remained flat overall, oscillating with precipitation. Results suggest that increasing corn yield, and thereby partial factor productivity, with standard shifts in cultivars over time, cannot alone solve the U.S. Corn Belt’s nitrate surplus problem, supporting previous recommendations for active and multi-layered conservation efforts. Five- to ten-year positive and negative sub-trends in nitrate export within the longer dataset reaffirm the importance of truly long-term experiments and monitoring to accurately assess the impacts of management. Keywords: Keywords., Corn, Loading, Nitrate, Water quality, Yield.","PeriodicalId":29714,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the ASABE","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Corn Yield Increase Under Constant Fertilizer Did Not Reduce Nitrate Export\",\"authors\":\"Chelsea Connair Clifford, Emily R. Waring, Carl H. Pederson, Matthew J. Helmers\",\"doi\":\"10.13031/ja.15538\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Highlights Corn yields increased from 1989 to 2021 in Iowa experimental plots at nitrogen fertilizer rates consistently just above current recommendations. Increased corn yields did not result in a decrease in drainage nitrate exports. Findings required long-term (>10 years) experiments and monitoring. Abstract. Aquatic problems from the export of nutrients, especially nitrate, from row crops are recalcitrant in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin and globally severe. Previous studies have proposed to reduce these problems in part by improving crop yields, particularly corn, leaving less nitrate surplus to export. Simultaneous increases in fertilizer application rates and grain yields in recent decades have made testing this notion with large-scale agricultural statistics difficult. This experiment in Iowa featured a corn-soybean rotation with corn fertilized with nitrogen at a nearly consistent rate from 1989 to 2021. Corn yields increased at a rate not statistically distinguishable from the surrounding county’s (144 vs. 148 kg ha-1 yr-1), but drainage nitrate concentration and loading remained flat overall, oscillating with precipitation. Results suggest that increasing corn yield, and thereby partial factor productivity, with standard shifts in cultivars over time, cannot alone solve the U.S. Corn Belt’s nitrate surplus problem, supporting previous recommendations for active and multi-layered conservation efforts. Five- to ten-year positive and negative sub-trends in nitrate export within the longer dataset reaffirm the importance of truly long-term experiments and monitoring to accurately assess the impacts of management. Keywords: Keywords., Corn, Loading, Nitrate, Water quality, Yield.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29714,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the ASABE\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the ASABE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.15538\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the ASABE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13031/ja.15538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

从1989年到2021年,爱荷华州试验田的玉米产量在氮肥施用量一直高于当前推荐用量的情况下有所增加。玉米产量的增加并未导致排水硝酸盐出口量的减少。研究结果需要长期(10年)的实验和监测。摘要在密西西比-阿恰法拉亚河流域,从行作物中输出营养物质,特别是硝酸盐,造成的水生问题是难以解决的,在全球范围内都很严重。以前的研究建议通过提高作物产量,特别是玉米产量,减少出口的硝酸盐过剩来部分减少这些问题。近几十年来,化肥施用量和粮食产量的同时增加,使得用大规模农业统计来检验这一概念变得困难。在爱荷华州进行的这项试验是玉米-大豆轮作,从1989年到2021年,玉米以几乎一致的速度施用氮肥。玉米产量的增长速度在统计上与周边县没有区别(144对148公斤/年),但排水硝酸盐浓度和负荷总体上保持平稳,与降水振荡。研究结果表明,单靠提高玉米产量,进而提高部分要素生产率,并不能解决美国玉米带的硝酸盐过剩问题,这支持了之前提出的积极和多层次保护措施的建议。在更长的数据集中,5至10年硝酸盐出口的积极和消极子趋势重申了真正长期实验和监测的重要性,以准确评估管理的影响。关键词:关键词。玉米,装载,硝酸盐,水质,产量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Corn Yield Increase Under Constant Fertilizer Did Not Reduce Nitrate Export
Highlights Corn yields increased from 1989 to 2021 in Iowa experimental plots at nitrogen fertilizer rates consistently just above current recommendations. Increased corn yields did not result in a decrease in drainage nitrate exports. Findings required long-term (>10 years) experiments and monitoring. Abstract. Aquatic problems from the export of nutrients, especially nitrate, from row crops are recalcitrant in the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin and globally severe. Previous studies have proposed to reduce these problems in part by improving crop yields, particularly corn, leaving less nitrate surplus to export. Simultaneous increases in fertilizer application rates and grain yields in recent decades have made testing this notion with large-scale agricultural statistics difficult. This experiment in Iowa featured a corn-soybean rotation with corn fertilized with nitrogen at a nearly consistent rate from 1989 to 2021. Corn yields increased at a rate not statistically distinguishable from the surrounding county’s (144 vs. 148 kg ha-1 yr-1), but drainage nitrate concentration and loading remained flat overall, oscillating with precipitation. Results suggest that increasing corn yield, and thereby partial factor productivity, with standard shifts in cultivars over time, cannot alone solve the U.S. Corn Belt’s nitrate surplus problem, supporting previous recommendations for active and multi-layered conservation efforts. Five- to ten-year positive and negative sub-trends in nitrate export within the longer dataset reaffirm the importance of truly long-term experiments and monitoring to accurately assess the impacts of management. Keywords: Keywords., Corn, Loading, Nitrate, Water quality, Yield.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信