临时性在机构稳定中的作用:过程观

IF 19.3 1区管理学 Q1 BUSINESS

Academy of Management Review Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.5465/amr.2019.0486

Juliane Reinecke, Thomas B. Lawrence

{"title":"临时性在机构稳定中的作用:过程观","authors":"Juliane Reinecke, Thomas B. Lawrence","doi":"10.5465/amr.2019.0486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The emerging processual view of institutions has eroded the assumption of institutional stability in favor of a more dynamic view of institutions as ongoing processes, thereby foregrounding the question of institutional stabilization. Grounded in a process ontology, we conceptualize institutions as ever-becoming yet enduring social processes that are meaningful and carry prescriptions for actors’ legitimate participation. Building on this conceptualization, we develop a theoretical model of the role of temporality in institutional stabilization that explores how three dimensions of institutions (meaning, prescriptions, participation) are each stabilized by a facet of temporality (temporal patterns, expectancies, mechanisms), as well as factors affecting each of these links. Our arguments contribute to writing on institutions in relation to temporality, agency and process.","PeriodicalId":7127,"journal":{"name":"Academy of Management Review","volume":"101 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of temporality in institutional stabilization: A process view\",\"authors\":\"Juliane Reinecke, Thomas B. Lawrence\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/amr.2019.0486\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The emerging processual view of institutions has eroded the assumption of institutional stability in favor of a more dynamic view of institutions as ongoing processes, thereby foregrounding the question of institutional stabilization. Grounded in a process ontology, we conceptualize institutions as ever-becoming yet enduring social processes that are meaningful and carry prescriptions for actors’ legitimate participation. Building on this conceptualization, we develop a theoretical model of the role of temporality in institutional stabilization that explores how three dimensions of institutions (meaning, prescriptions, participation) are each stabilized by a facet of temporality (temporal patterns, expectancies, mechanisms), as well as factors affecting each of these links. Our arguments contribute to writing on institutions in relation to temporality, agency and process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7127,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academy of Management Review\",\"volume\":\"101 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academy of Management Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0486\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academy of Management Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0486","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

正在出现的关于机构的过程观点削弱了关于机构稳定的假设，而赞成将机构视为持续过程的更有活力的观点，从而突出了机构稳定的问题。在过程本体论的基础上，我们将制度概念化为不断发展但持久的社会过程，这些过程是有意义的，并且为参与者的合法参与提供了处方。在这一概念的基础上，我们发展了一个暂时性在制度稳定中的作用的理论模型，探讨了制度的三个维度(意义、规定、参与)是如何通过暂时性的一个方面(时间模式、期望、机制)来稳定的，以及影响这些联系的因素。我们的论点有助于撰写与时间性、代理和过程有关的制度。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The role of temporality in institutional stabilization: A process view

The emerging processual view of institutions has eroded the assumption of institutional stability in favor of a more dynamic view of institutions as ongoing processes, thereby foregrounding the question of institutional stabilization. Grounded in a process ontology, we conceptualize institutions as ever-becoming yet enduring social processes that are meaningful and carry prescriptions for actors’ legitimate participation. Building on this conceptualization, we develop a theoretical model of the role of temporality in institutional stabilization that explores how three dimensions of institutions (meaning, prescriptions, participation) are each stabilized by a facet of temporality (temporal patterns, expectancies, mechanisms), as well as factors affecting each of these links. Our arguments contribute to writing on institutions in relation to temporality, agency and process.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Academy of Management Review Multiple-

CiteScore

24.60

自引率

2.40%

发文量

期刊介绍： The mission of AMR is to publish theoretical insights that advance our understanding of management and organizations. Submissions to AMR must extend theory in ways that develop testable knowledge-based claims. To do this, researchers can develop new management and organization theory, significantly challenge or clarify existing theory, synthesize recent advances and ideas into fresh, if not entirely new theory, or initiate a search for new theory by identifying and delineating a novel theoretical problem. The contributions of AMR articles often are grounded in “normal science disciplines” of economics, psychology, sociology, or social psychology as well as nontraditional perspectives, such as the humanities.