区域信任对创新影响的空间异质性

IF 7.2 1区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Thore Sören Bischoff, Petrik Runst, Kilian Bizer
{"title":"区域信任对创新影响的空间异质性","authors":"Thore Sören Bischoff, Petrik Runst, Kilian Bizer","doi":"10.1080/00130095.2023.2252552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractGeneralized trust positively affects innovation at the regional level by reducing transaction costs and supporting collaboration. We develop theoretical reasons for why the trust–innovation relationship is heterogeneous across geographic space and identify two main mechanisms that drive this result: first, only regions in the lower half of the trust distribution benefit from an increase in trust; and second, as smaller firms lack internal capabilities such as research and development and therefore resort to informal collaboration, the trust–innovation relationship is stronger in regions with a large share of small firms. We argue that regional innovation work differently across regions and different mechanisms of cooperation can be leveraged to achieve innovation success. Our results highlight the role of trust during a certain stage in the process of regional economic development, since both low trust and a larger share of small business constitute characteristics of less developed regions.Key words: innovationtrustregional innovation systems AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge comments from the members of the DFG-network on “The dynamics of innovation systems” which helped to improve the article and input received from participants at the Research Colloquium at the Chair of Economic Policy and SME research at the University of Goettingen.Notes1 OECD RegPat database, https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/intellectual-property-statistics-and-analysis.htm#ip-data.2 European Social Survey—European Research Infrastructure, https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/.3 Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.4 Office of National Statistics (UK), gross domestic product https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp.5 Heritage Foundation, 2022 index of economic freedom, https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2022/book/2022_IndexofEconomicFreedom_Highlights.pdf.6 Each inventor is assigned a patent share that is equal to the inverse of the number of inventors of a patent.7 The following questions are included: 1. “Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people?” 2. “Do you think that most people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance, or would they try to be fair?” 3. “Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful or that they are mostly looking out for themselves?”8 ESPON database, https://database.espon.eu/.","PeriodicalId":48225,"journal":{"name":"Economic Geography","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Spatial Heterogeneity in the Effect of Regional Trust on Innovation\",\"authors\":\"Thore Sören Bischoff, Petrik Runst, Kilian Bizer\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00130095.2023.2252552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractGeneralized trust positively affects innovation at the regional level by reducing transaction costs and supporting collaboration. We develop theoretical reasons for why the trust–innovation relationship is heterogeneous across geographic space and identify two main mechanisms that drive this result: first, only regions in the lower half of the trust distribution benefit from an increase in trust; and second, as smaller firms lack internal capabilities such as research and development and therefore resort to informal collaboration, the trust–innovation relationship is stronger in regions with a large share of small firms. We argue that regional innovation work differently across regions and different mechanisms of cooperation can be leveraged to achieve innovation success. Our results highlight the role of trust during a certain stage in the process of regional economic development, since both low trust and a larger share of small business constitute characteristics of less developed regions.Key words: innovationtrustregional innovation systems AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge comments from the members of the DFG-network on “The dynamics of innovation systems” which helped to improve the article and input received from participants at the Research Colloquium at the Chair of Economic Policy and SME research at the University of Goettingen.Notes1 OECD RegPat database, https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/intellectual-property-statistics-and-analysis.htm#ip-data.2 European Social Survey—European Research Infrastructure, https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/.3 Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.4 Office of National Statistics (UK), gross domestic product https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp.5 Heritage Foundation, 2022 index of economic freedom, https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2022/book/2022_IndexofEconomicFreedom_Highlights.pdf.6 Each inventor is assigned a patent share that is equal to the inverse of the number of inventors of a patent.7 The following questions are included: 1. “Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people?” 2. “Do you think that most people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance, or would they try to be fair?” 3. “Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful or that they are mostly looking out for themselves?”8 ESPON database, https://database.espon.eu/.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48225,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Geography\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Geography\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2023.2252552\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Geography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00130095.2023.2252552","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要广义信任通过降低交易成本和支持协作对区域创新产生积极影响。我们从理论上解释了为什么信任-创新关系在地理空间上是异质的,并确定了驱动这一结果的两个主要机制:第一,只有信任分布的下半部分的地区从信任的增加中受益;其次,由于小型企业缺乏研发等内部能力,因此求助于非正式合作,因此在小型企业占多数的地区,信任-创新关系更强。我们认为,区域创新在不同地区的作用是不同的,不同的合作机制可以促进创新的成功。我们的研究结果突出了信任在区域经济发展过程中一定阶段的作用,因为低信任度和小企业比例较大构成了欠发达地区的特征。作者感谢dfg网络成员对“创新系统的动态”的评论,这些评论有助于改进本文,并感谢在哥廷根大学经济政策和中小企业研究主席的研究研讨会上收到的与会者的意见。注1经合组织RegPat数据库,https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/intellectual-property-statistics-and-analysis.htm#ip-data.2欧洲社会调查-欧洲研究基础设施,https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/.3欧盟统计局,https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.4英国国家统计局,国内生产总值https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp.5传统基金会,2022年经济自由指数,https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2022/book/2022_IndexofEconomicFreedom_Highlights.pdf.6每个发明人被分配的专利份额等于一项专利的发明人数量的倒数包括以下问题:1。“一般来说,你会说大多数人都是可以信任的,还是说你在与人打交道时越小心越好?”“2。“你认为大多数人一旦有机会就会利用你,还是会公平对待你?”“3。“你会说大多数时候人们都是想帮忙,还是他们主要是在照顾自己?”8 ESPON数据库,https://database.espon.eu/。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Spatial Heterogeneity in the Effect of Regional Trust on Innovation
AbstractGeneralized trust positively affects innovation at the regional level by reducing transaction costs and supporting collaboration. We develop theoretical reasons for why the trust–innovation relationship is heterogeneous across geographic space and identify two main mechanisms that drive this result: first, only regions in the lower half of the trust distribution benefit from an increase in trust; and second, as smaller firms lack internal capabilities such as research and development and therefore resort to informal collaboration, the trust–innovation relationship is stronger in regions with a large share of small firms. We argue that regional innovation work differently across regions and different mechanisms of cooperation can be leveraged to achieve innovation success. Our results highlight the role of trust during a certain stage in the process of regional economic development, since both low trust and a larger share of small business constitute characteristics of less developed regions.Key words: innovationtrustregional innovation systems AcknowledgmentsThe authors gratefully acknowledge comments from the members of the DFG-network on “The dynamics of innovation systems” which helped to improve the article and input received from participants at the Research Colloquium at the Chair of Economic Policy and SME research at the University of Goettingen.Notes1 OECD RegPat database, https://www.oecd.org/sti/inno/intellectual-property-statistics-and-analysis.htm#ip-data.2 European Social Survey—European Research Infrastructure, https://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/.3 Eurostat, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database.4 Office of National Statistics (UK), gross domestic product https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp.5 Heritage Foundation, 2022 index of economic freedom, https://www.heritage.org/index/pdf/2022/book/2022_IndexofEconomicFreedom_Highlights.pdf.6 Each inventor is assigned a patent share that is equal to the inverse of the number of inventors of a patent.7 The following questions are included: 1. “Generally speaking, would you say that most people can be trusted, or that you can’t be too careful in dealing with people?” 2. “Do you think that most people would try to take advantage of you if they got the chance, or would they try to be fair?” 3. “Would you say that most of the time people try to be helpful or that they are mostly looking out for themselves?”8 ESPON database, https://database.espon.eu/.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Geography
Economic Geography Multiple-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Economic Geography is a peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing original research that advances the field of economic geography. Their goal is to publish high-quality studies that are both theoretically robust and grounded in empirical evidence, contributing to our understanding of the geographic factors and consequences of economic processes. It welcome submissions on a wide range of topics that provide primary evidence for significant theoretical interventions, offering key insights into important economic, social, development, and environmental issues. To ensure the highest quality publications, all submissions undergo a rigorous peer-review process with at least three external referees and an editor. Economic Geography has been owned by Clark University since 1925 and plays a central role in supporting the global activities of the field, providing publications and other forms of scholarly support. The journal is published five times a year in January, March, June, August, and November.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信