事实核查在Facebook上揭穿Covid-19错误信息的局限性:以faktografh .hr为例

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION

Central European Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.51480/1899-5101.16.1(33).3

Mato Brautovic, Romana John

{"title":"事实核查在Facebook上揭穿Covid-19错误信息的局限性:以faktografh .hr为例","authors":"Mato Brautovic, Romana John","doi":"10.51480/1899-5101.16.1(33).3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explores the role of fact-checking organisations in debunking the disinformation about COVID-19, based on the case of the Croatian fact-checking organisation Faktograf.hr. By using computational methods and content analysis, we analysed 212 debunked fact-checks relating to Covid-19 (N=212) published between July 1, 2020, and the March 31, 2021. The sample was used to compare the debunked and disinformation versions of the same story, regarding their impact on users in the form of engagement (likes, comments, shares) as measure of efficiency of fact-checking. The main findings show that the practice of publishing fact-checks on websites and using social media to promote debunked content is insufficient.","PeriodicalId":40610,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Limitations of Fact-checking on Debunking Covid-19 Misinformation on Facebook: Case of Faktograf.hr\",\"authors\":\"Mato Brautovic, Romana John\",\"doi\":\"10.51480/1899-5101.16.1(33).3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study explores the role of fact-checking organisations in debunking the disinformation about COVID-19, based on the case of the Croatian fact-checking organisation Faktograf.hr. By using computational methods and content analysis, we analysed 212 debunked fact-checks relating to Covid-19 (N=212) published between July 1, 2020, and the March 31, 2021. The sample was used to compare the debunked and disinformation versions of the same story, regarding their impact on users in the form of engagement (likes, comments, shares) as measure of efficiency of fact-checking. The main findings show that the practice of publishing fact-checks on websites and using social media to promote debunked content is insufficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.16.1(33).3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51480/1899-5101.16.1(33).3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以克罗地亚事实核查组织faktografh .hr为例，探讨了事实核查组织在揭穿关于COVID-19的虚假信息方面的作用。通过计算方法和内容分析，我们分析了2020年7月1日至2021年3月31日期间发表的212篇与Covid-19相关的事实核查(N=212)。该样本用于比较同一故事的揭穿版本和虚假版本，将它们以参与形式(喜欢、评论、分享)对用户的影响作为事实核查效率的衡量标准。主要调查结果表明，在网站上发布事实核查和利用社交媒体宣传被揭穿内容的做法是不够的。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Limitations of Fact-checking on Debunking Covid-19 Misinformation on Facebook: Case of Faktograf.hr

This study explores the role of fact-checking organisations in debunking the disinformation about COVID-19, based on the case of the Croatian fact-checking organisation Faktograf.hr. By using computational methods and content analysis, we analysed 212 debunked fact-checks relating to Covid-19 (N=212) published between July 1, 2020, and the March 31, 2021. The sample was used to compare the debunked and disinformation versions of the same story, regarding their impact on users in the form of engagement (likes, comments, shares) as measure of efficiency of fact-checking. The main findings show that the practice of publishing fact-checks on websites and using social media to promote debunked content is insufficient.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Central European Journal of Communication COMMUNICATION-

CiteScore

0.90

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Central European Journal of Communication provides an international forum for empirical, critical and interpretative, quantitative and qualitative research examining the role of communication in Central Europe and beyond. The journal welcomes high quality research and analysis from diverse theoretical and methodological approaches, as well as reviews of publications and publishes notes on a wide range of literature on media and communication studies. Submission of original articles is open to all researchers interested in communication and media.