第16届AERA布朗教育研究讲座“少一点攻击性”:学校整合作为追求教育公平的激进包容

IF 5.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Prudence L. Carter
{"title":"第16届AERA布朗教育研究讲座“少一点攻击性”:学校整合作为追求教育公平的激进包容","authors":"Prudence L. Carter","doi":"10.3102/0013189x231187319","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The historical record reveals that in the final opinion of the landmark school segregation case Cooper v. Aaron, the U.S. Supreme Court justices intentionally used the term “desegregation” rather than “integration” to soften the ire of those opposed to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. The justices believed that Southern resisters to integrations would find the former term “a shade less offensive” than the latter. In this lecture, education scholar and sociologist Prudence Carter reverses that logic and discusses why educational practices of “radical inclusion” are “a shade less offensive” today than mere desegregation in light of persistent educational disparities by race, ethnicity, and class. Carter draws on her original research and other social science evidence to show why societies marred by social and economic divides continue to struggle with the realization of integration in schools and communities. In her commentary on multiple dimensions of educational inequality, she highlights policies and evidence-based practices that have the potential to bring us closer to equity in schools and society.","PeriodicalId":11404,"journal":{"name":"Educational Researcher","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"16th Annual AERA <i>Brown</i> Lecture in Education Research “A Shade Less Offensive”: School Integration as Radical Inclusion in the Pursuit of Educational Equity\",\"authors\":\"Prudence L. Carter\",\"doi\":\"10.3102/0013189x231187319\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The historical record reveals that in the final opinion of the landmark school segregation case Cooper v. Aaron, the U.S. Supreme Court justices intentionally used the term “desegregation” rather than “integration” to soften the ire of those opposed to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. The justices believed that Southern resisters to integrations would find the former term “a shade less offensive” than the latter. In this lecture, education scholar and sociologist Prudence Carter reverses that logic and discusses why educational practices of “radical inclusion” are “a shade less offensive” today than mere desegregation in light of persistent educational disparities by race, ethnicity, and class. Carter draws on her original research and other social science evidence to show why societies marred by social and economic divides continue to struggle with the realization of integration in schools and communities. In her commentary on multiple dimensions of educational inequality, she highlights policies and evidence-based practices that have the potential to bring us closer to equity in schools and society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11404,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Researcher\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Researcher\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x231187319\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Researcher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x231187319","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

历史记录显示,在具有里程碑意义的学校种族隔离案库珀诉亚伦案的最终意见中,美国最高法院法官故意使用“废除种族隔离”而不是“融合”一词,以缓和反对布朗诉教育委员会案裁决的人的愤怒。法官们认为,南方反对种族融合的人会发现前者的冒犯性比后者要小一些。在这次演讲中,教育学者和社会学家普鲁登斯·卡特(Prudence Carter)推翻了这一逻辑,并讨论了为什么在种族、民族和阶级之间持续存在的教育差异中,“激进包容”的教育实践比单纯的废除种族隔离“少了一点冒犯性”。卡特利用她的原始研究和其他社会科学证据来说明为什么被社会和经济鸿沟所破坏的社会仍然在努力实现学校和社区的融合。在她对教育不平等的多个维度的评论中,她强调了有可能使我们更接近学校和社会公平的政策和循证实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
16th Annual AERA Brown Lecture in Education Research “A Shade Less Offensive”: School Integration as Radical Inclusion in the Pursuit of Educational Equity
The historical record reveals that in the final opinion of the landmark school segregation case Cooper v. Aaron, the U.S. Supreme Court justices intentionally used the term “desegregation” rather than “integration” to soften the ire of those opposed to the Brown v. Board of Education decision. The justices believed that Southern resisters to integrations would find the former term “a shade less offensive” than the latter. In this lecture, education scholar and sociologist Prudence Carter reverses that logic and discusses why educational practices of “radical inclusion” are “a shade less offensive” today than mere desegregation in light of persistent educational disparities by race, ethnicity, and class. Carter draws on her original research and other social science evidence to show why societies marred by social and economic divides continue to struggle with the realization of integration in schools and communities. In her commentary on multiple dimensions of educational inequality, she highlights policies and evidence-based practices that have the potential to bring us closer to equity in schools and society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Researcher
Educational Researcher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
15.30
自引率
1.20%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Educational Researcher publishes scholarly articles with broad significance to the education research community, spanning various areas within education research and related disciplines. The journal aims to disseminate major programmatic research and new findings of wide importance. It is issued nine times annually and welcomes submissions of feature articles, reviews/essays, briefs, and technical comments. Additionally, the journal publishes commentary articles categorized as policy forum, letters, and books, among others.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信