Assessing利用物种分布模型分析交易外来蕨类植物的入侵风险

IF 3.8 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Emily J. McCulloch-Jones, Tineke Kraaij, Neil Crouch, Katelyn T. Faulkner
{"title":"Assessing利用物种分布模型分析交易外来蕨类植物的入侵风险","authors":"Emily J. McCulloch-Jones, Tineke Kraaij, Neil Crouch, Katelyn T. Faulkner","doi":"10.3897/neobiota.87.101104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Risk analysis plays a crucial role in regulating and managing alien and invasive species but can be time-consuming and costly. Alternatively, combining invasion and impact history with species distribution models offers a cost-effective and time-efficient approach to assess invasion risk and identify species for which a comprehensive risk analysis should take precedence. We conducted such an assessment for six traded alien fern species, determining their invasion risk in countries where they are traded. Four of the species ( Dicksonia antarctica , Dryopteris erythrosora , Lygodium japonicum , and Phlebodium aureum ) showed limited global distributions, while Adiantum raddianum and Sphaeropteris cooperi had broader distributions. A. raddianum , however, was the only species found to pose a high invasion risk in two known trade countries – the USA and Australia – and requires a complete risk analysis to determine the appropriate regulatory responses. Dicksonia antarctica , Phlebodium aureum (for New Zealand), and Dryopteris erythrosora (for the USA) posed a medium risk of invasion due to the lack of evidence of impacts, and a complete risk analysis is thus deemed less crucial for these species in these countries. For other species, suitable environments were not predicted in the countries where they are traded, thus the risk of invasion is low, and a complete risk analysis is not required. For species in countries where suitable environments are predicted but no trade information or presence data are available, risk assessments are recommended to better determine the risk posed. Despite the relatively limited potential global distribution of the studied ferns relative to other major plant invaders (e.g., Pinus spp. and Acacia spp.), their history of invasion, documented impacts in pristine environments, and high propagule pressure from trade warrants concern, possibly necessitating legislative and regulatory measures in environmentally suitable regions.","PeriodicalId":54290,"journal":{"name":"Neobiota","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the invasion risk of traded alien ferns using species distribution models\",\"authors\":\"Emily J. McCulloch-Jones, Tineke Kraaij, Neil Crouch, Katelyn T. Faulkner\",\"doi\":\"10.3897/neobiota.87.101104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Risk analysis plays a crucial role in regulating and managing alien and invasive species but can be time-consuming and costly. Alternatively, combining invasion and impact history with species distribution models offers a cost-effective and time-efficient approach to assess invasion risk and identify species for which a comprehensive risk analysis should take precedence. We conducted such an assessment for six traded alien fern species, determining their invasion risk in countries where they are traded. Four of the species ( Dicksonia antarctica , Dryopteris erythrosora , Lygodium japonicum , and Phlebodium aureum ) showed limited global distributions, while Adiantum raddianum and Sphaeropteris cooperi had broader distributions. A. raddianum , however, was the only species found to pose a high invasion risk in two known trade countries – the USA and Australia – and requires a complete risk analysis to determine the appropriate regulatory responses. Dicksonia antarctica , Phlebodium aureum (for New Zealand), and Dryopteris erythrosora (for the USA) posed a medium risk of invasion due to the lack of evidence of impacts, and a complete risk analysis is thus deemed less crucial for these species in these countries. For other species, suitable environments were not predicted in the countries where they are traded, thus the risk of invasion is low, and a complete risk analysis is not required. For species in countries where suitable environments are predicted but no trade information or presence data are available, risk assessments are recommended to better determine the risk posed. Despite the relatively limited potential global distribution of the studied ferns relative to other major plant invaders (e.g., Pinus spp. and Acacia spp.), their history of invasion, documented impacts in pristine environments, and high propagule pressure from trade warrants concern, possibly necessitating legislative and regulatory measures in environmentally suitable regions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54290,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neobiota\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neobiota\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.87.101104\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neobiota","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.87.101104","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

风险分析在调节和管理外来和入侵物种方面起着至关重要的作用,但可能既耗时又昂贵。或者,将入侵和影响历史与物种分布模型相结合,可以提供一种经济高效的方法来评估入侵风险,并确定应该优先进行综合风险分析的物种。我们对六种交易的外来蕨类植物进行了这样的评估,确定它们在交易国家的入侵风险。其中4种(Dicksonia antarctica、Dryopteris erythrosora、Lygodium japonicum和Phlebodium aureum)全球分布有限,Adiantum raddianum和Sphaeropteris cooperi分布较广。然而,在美国和澳大利亚这两个已知的贸易国家中,镭是唯一发现具有高入侵风险的物种,需要进行完整的风险分析以确定适当的监管反应。由于缺乏影响的证据,南极双孢虫、金黄色白蛉(新西兰)和红鳞毛蕨(美国)构成了中等的入侵风险,因此对这些国家的这些物种进行完整的风险分析被认为不那么重要。对于其他物种,在其交易的国家没有预测到合适的环境,因此入侵的风险较低,不需要进行完整的风险分析。对于预测适宜环境但没有贸易信息或存在数据的国家的物种,建议进行风险评估,以更好地确定所构成的风险。尽管与其他主要入侵植物(如松属和金合欢属)相比,所研究的蕨类植物在全球的潜在分布相对有限,但它们的入侵历史、对原始环境的记录影响以及贸易带来的巨大繁殖压力值得关注,可能需要在环境适宜的地区采取立法和监管措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the invasion risk of traded alien ferns using species distribution models
Risk analysis plays a crucial role in regulating and managing alien and invasive species but can be time-consuming and costly. Alternatively, combining invasion and impact history with species distribution models offers a cost-effective and time-efficient approach to assess invasion risk and identify species for which a comprehensive risk analysis should take precedence. We conducted such an assessment for six traded alien fern species, determining their invasion risk in countries where they are traded. Four of the species ( Dicksonia antarctica , Dryopteris erythrosora , Lygodium japonicum , and Phlebodium aureum ) showed limited global distributions, while Adiantum raddianum and Sphaeropteris cooperi had broader distributions. A. raddianum , however, was the only species found to pose a high invasion risk in two known trade countries – the USA and Australia – and requires a complete risk analysis to determine the appropriate regulatory responses. Dicksonia antarctica , Phlebodium aureum (for New Zealand), and Dryopteris erythrosora (for the USA) posed a medium risk of invasion due to the lack of evidence of impacts, and a complete risk analysis is thus deemed less crucial for these species in these countries. For other species, suitable environments were not predicted in the countries where they are traded, thus the risk of invasion is low, and a complete risk analysis is not required. For species in countries where suitable environments are predicted but no trade information or presence data are available, risk assessments are recommended to better determine the risk posed. Despite the relatively limited potential global distribution of the studied ferns relative to other major plant invaders (e.g., Pinus spp. and Acacia spp.), their history of invasion, documented impacts in pristine environments, and high propagule pressure from trade warrants concern, possibly necessitating legislative and regulatory measures in environmentally suitable regions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neobiota
Neobiota Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
7.80%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: NeoBiota is a peer-reviewed, open-access, rapid online journal launched to accelerate research on alien species and biological invasions: aquatic and terrestrial, animals, plants, fungi and micro-organisms. The journal NeoBiota is a continuation of the former NEOBIOTA publication series; for volumes 1-8 see http://www.oekosys.tu-berlin.de/menue/neobiota All articles are published immediately upon editorial approval. All published papers can be freely copied, downloaded, printed and distributed at no charge for the reader. Authors are thus encouraged to post the pdf files of published papers on their homepages or elsewhere to expedite distribution. There is no charge for color.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信