中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与脓毒症预后的关系——来自三级保健中心的观察性研究

Birjesh Kumar Thakran, Yogesh Kumar Chahar, Shikha Jain, Sundeep Jain
{"title":"中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值与脓毒症预后的关系——来自三级保健中心的观察性研究","authors":"Birjesh Kumar Thakran, Yogesh Kumar Chahar, Shikha Jain, Sundeep Jain","doi":"10.4103/ajim.ajim_23_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives: This study aims to determine the association of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, ventilator use, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality among patients with sepsis. Methods: This prospective observational study included 220 patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU. Details such as age, gender, comorbidities, complaints, SOFA score, diagnosis, and outcomes were collected. Routine investigations included complete blood count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin. NLR was derived using the Beckman Coulter DXH-800 Hematology Analyser. A cutoff of 9.11 was taken as high NLR. Patients were followed up till 28 days after treatment. The outcomes studied included 28-day mortality and ICU stay. Results: The mean SOFA score were 7.07 ± 2.56. Based on NLR cutoffs, 146 (66.36%) patients had high NLR while 74 (33.64%) cases had normal or low NLR. SOFA score showed no significant association with high NLR ( P = 0.62). Ventilator was used in 118 (53.6%) cases with median of 3.5 days’ duration. The overall ICU stay was 5.6 ± 4.9 days. Mortality was seen in 46 (20.9%) cases. Compared to those with normal NLR, patients with high NLR had significantly more ventilator use (60.9% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.0027) and mortality (30.14% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.0004). The duration of ventilator use and ICU stay was statistically comparable. Conclusion: High NLR shows a significant association with adverse outcomes of sepsis patients in terms of ventilator use and mortality. Since it is cheap and easy to use, it can be applied in more basic settings while monitoring sepsis patients.","PeriodicalId":8012,"journal":{"name":"APIK Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio with Prognosis in Sepsis – An Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Center\",\"authors\":\"Birjesh Kumar Thakran, Yogesh Kumar Chahar, Shikha Jain, Sundeep Jain\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ajim.ajim_23_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objectives: This study aims to determine the association of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, ventilator use, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality among patients with sepsis. Methods: This prospective observational study included 220 patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU. Details such as age, gender, comorbidities, complaints, SOFA score, diagnosis, and outcomes were collected. Routine investigations included complete blood count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin. NLR was derived using the Beckman Coulter DXH-800 Hematology Analyser. A cutoff of 9.11 was taken as high NLR. Patients were followed up till 28 days after treatment. The outcomes studied included 28-day mortality and ICU stay. Results: The mean SOFA score were 7.07 ± 2.56. Based on NLR cutoffs, 146 (66.36%) patients had high NLR while 74 (33.64%) cases had normal or low NLR. SOFA score showed no significant association with high NLR ( P = 0.62). Ventilator was used in 118 (53.6%) cases with median of 3.5 days’ duration. The overall ICU stay was 5.6 ± 4.9 days. Mortality was seen in 46 (20.9%) cases. Compared to those with normal NLR, patients with high NLR had significantly more ventilator use (60.9% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.0027) and mortality (30.14% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.0004). The duration of ventilator use and ICU stay was statistically comparable. Conclusion: High NLR shows a significant association with adverse outcomes of sepsis patients in terms of ventilator use and mortality. Since it is cheap and easy to use, it can be applied in more basic settings while monitoring sepsis patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"APIK Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"APIK Journal of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajim.ajim_23_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"APIK Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ajim.ajim_23_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要目的:本研究旨在确定中性粒细胞-淋巴细胞比率(NLR)与脓毒症患者序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分、呼吸机使用、重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间和死亡率的关系。方法:本前瞻性观察性研究纳入了220例ICU收治的脓毒症患者。收集了年龄、性别、合并症、投诉、SOFA评分、诊断和结果等详细信息。常规检查包括全血细胞计数、c反应蛋白和降钙素原。NLR使用Beckman Coulter DXH-800血液学分析仪得出。以9.11为截止点为高NLR。随访至治疗后28 d。研究结果包括28天死亡率和ICU住院时间。结果:SOFA平均评分为7.07±2.56分。根据NLR临界值,高NLR 146例(66.36%),低或正常NLR 74例(33.64%)。SOFA评分与高NLR无显著相关性(P = 0.62)。118例(53.6%)患者使用呼吸机,中位持续时间为3.5 d。ICU总住院时间5.6±4.9天。死亡46例(20.9%)。与NLR正常的患者相比,高NLR患者的呼吸机使用率(60.9% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.0027)和死亡率(30.14% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.0004)显著增加。呼吸机使用时间与ICU住院时间具有统计学上的可比性。结论:高NLR与脓毒症患者呼吸机使用和死亡率的不良结局显著相关。由于它便宜且易于使用,因此可以在监测败血症患者时应用于更基本的环境。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte Ratio with Prognosis in Sepsis – An Observational Study from a Tertiary Care Center
Abstract Objectives: This study aims to determine the association of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) with sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, ventilator use, duration of intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and mortality among patients with sepsis. Methods: This prospective observational study included 220 patients with sepsis admitted to the ICU. Details such as age, gender, comorbidities, complaints, SOFA score, diagnosis, and outcomes were collected. Routine investigations included complete blood count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin. NLR was derived using the Beckman Coulter DXH-800 Hematology Analyser. A cutoff of 9.11 was taken as high NLR. Patients were followed up till 28 days after treatment. The outcomes studied included 28-day mortality and ICU stay. Results: The mean SOFA score were 7.07 ± 2.56. Based on NLR cutoffs, 146 (66.36%) patients had high NLR while 74 (33.64%) cases had normal or low NLR. SOFA score showed no significant association with high NLR ( P = 0.62). Ventilator was used in 118 (53.6%) cases with median of 3.5 days’ duration. The overall ICU stay was 5.6 ± 4.9 days. Mortality was seen in 46 (20.9%) cases. Compared to those with normal NLR, patients with high NLR had significantly more ventilator use (60.9% vs. 39.1%, P = 0.0027) and mortality (30.14% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.0004). The duration of ventilator use and ICU stay was statistically comparable. Conclusion: High NLR shows a significant association with adverse outcomes of sepsis patients in terms of ventilator use and mortality. Since it is cheap and easy to use, it can be applied in more basic settings while monitoring sepsis patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信