学生参与:在自由主义民主模式的黄昏和新自由主义政策的兴起之间

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Daniel García-Pérez, Jara González-Lamas
{"title":"学生参与:在自由主义民主模式的黄昏和新自由主义政策的兴起之间","authors":"Daniel García-Pérez, Jara González-Lamas","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2023.2243318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTStudent participation has become a relevant topic in the international debate on education. However, the conceptions of the meaning of participation and its practical implications are very heterogeneous. This article reviews how educational policies have conceived student participation in Western countries. Having conceptualised student participation, the role of the liberal model in shaping school democracy and student participation is explored. It is suggested that this model is in crisis due to two main factors. On the one hand, the organisation of democratic processes in schools has well recognised limitations. On the other hand, the pressure of the neoliberal agenda on standardisation and the emphasis on individual success omit any interest in democratic aims. The evolution of education policies concerning student participation is illustrated with reference to a case analysis of Spanish state educational legislation. The future of student participation is reflected on.KEYWORDS: school democracyschool governmentliberal democracyneoliberal educationparticipation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The terms school council and student/pupil councils are commonly used with equivalent meaning in the literature. However, some countries differentiate between student and school councils. The former includes students and some coordinating teachers, while the later is an organ with representatives from all the groups of the educational community (families, teachers, students, management team and even the administration).","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Student participation: between the twilight of the liberal model of democracy and the rise of neoliberal policies\",\"authors\":\"Daniel García-Pérez, Jara González-Lamas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14681366.2023.2243318\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTStudent participation has become a relevant topic in the international debate on education. However, the conceptions of the meaning of participation and its practical implications are very heterogeneous. This article reviews how educational policies have conceived student participation in Western countries. Having conceptualised student participation, the role of the liberal model in shaping school democracy and student participation is explored. It is suggested that this model is in crisis due to two main factors. On the one hand, the organisation of democratic processes in schools has well recognised limitations. On the other hand, the pressure of the neoliberal agenda on standardisation and the emphasis on individual success omit any interest in democratic aims. The evolution of education policies concerning student participation is illustrated with reference to a case analysis of Spanish state educational legislation. The future of student participation is reflected on.KEYWORDS: school democracyschool governmentliberal democracyneoliberal educationparticipation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The terms school council and student/pupil councils are commonly used with equivalent meaning in the literature. However, some countries differentiate between student and school councils. The former includes students and some coordinating teachers, while the later is an organ with representatives from all the groups of the educational community (families, teachers, students, management team and even the administration).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46617,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"volume\":\"61 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pedagogy Culture and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2243318\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2243318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要学生参与已成为国际教育争论的热点话题。然而,参与的意义及其实际含义的概念是非常不同的。本文回顾了西方国家的教育政策对学生参与的影响。在对学生参与进行概念化之后,本文探讨了自由主义模式在塑造学校民主和学生参与方面的作用。笔者认为,由于两个主要因素,这一模式正处于危机之中。一方面,在学校中组织民主进程具有公认的局限性。另一方面,新自由主义议程对标准化的压力和对个人成功的强调忽略了对民主目标的任何兴趣。通过对西班牙国家教育立法的案例分析,阐述了有关学生参与的教育政策的演变。学生参与的未来被反思。关键词:学校民主学校政府自由主义民主新自由主义教育参与披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。学校理事会和学生/学生理事会这两个术语在文献中通常具有相同的含义。然而,一些国家区分学生委员会和学校委员会。前者包括学生和一些协调教师,后者是一个由教育界各群体(家庭、教师、学生、管理团队甚至行政部门)代表组成的机构。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Student participation: between the twilight of the liberal model of democracy and the rise of neoliberal policies
ABSTRACTStudent participation has become a relevant topic in the international debate on education. However, the conceptions of the meaning of participation and its practical implications are very heterogeneous. This article reviews how educational policies have conceived student participation in Western countries. Having conceptualised student participation, the role of the liberal model in shaping school democracy and student participation is explored. It is suggested that this model is in crisis due to two main factors. On the one hand, the organisation of democratic processes in schools has well recognised limitations. On the other hand, the pressure of the neoliberal agenda on standardisation and the emphasis on individual success omit any interest in democratic aims. The evolution of education policies concerning student participation is illustrated with reference to a case analysis of Spanish state educational legislation. The future of student participation is reflected on.KEYWORDS: school democracyschool governmentliberal democracyneoliberal educationparticipation Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. The terms school council and student/pupil councils are commonly used with equivalent meaning in the literature. However, some countries differentiate between student and school councils. The former includes students and some coordinating teachers, while the later is an organ with representatives from all the groups of the educational community (families, teachers, students, management team and even the administration).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信