在澳大利亚的 Bt 棉花中,"破蛹 "或消灭 Helicoverpa spp.(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)的越冬蛹是否仍然适用?

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 ENTOMOLOGY
Mary E. A. Whitehouse, Colin R. Tann, Michael V. Braunack
{"title":"在澳大利亚的 Bt 棉花中,\"破蛹 \"或消灭 Helicoverpa spp.(鳞翅目:夜蛾科)的越冬蛹是否仍然适用?","authors":"Mary E. A. Whitehouse,&nbsp;Colin R. Tann,&nbsp;Michael V. Braunack","doi":"10.1111/aen.12669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transgenic Bt cotton was developed to control lepidopteran pests like the cotton bollworm, <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i>. However, there was concern that <i>H. armigera</i> would develop resistance to Bt cotton as this species had developed resistance to many insecticides and Bt toxins. To counter resistance, the cotton industry developed a resistance management plan (RMP) that included techniques to block resistant genes surviving from one season to the next (seasonal quarantining). One such technique is pupae busting, where cotton fields are cultivated after harvest, destroying potentially resistant pupating <i>Helicoverpa</i> spp. While pupae busting was important when there was only one insecticidal gene in Bt cotton, is it still relevant now Bt cotton has three insecticidal Bt genes? To address this question, we reviewed the development of pupae busting as a tool and its role in the current RMP. This included examining the ecology and behavioural characteristics of <i>Helicoverpa</i> spp. that impact on pupae busting efficacy (e.g., diapause, pupal mortality and pupae depth); the effect of soil type and different tillage techniques on pupae busting efficacy; and pupae busting within the context of Australia's current cotton farming system. We also looked at alternative forms of seasonal quarantining, such as using bisexual attract-and-kill techniques against adults. We confirmed that soil for pupae busting needs to be checked for moisture, which ideally should be less than the soil plastic limit. Comparisons between reports indicated that under good conditions, ‘go-devils’ and chisel ploughs were excellent pupae busters. While a bisexual attract-and-kill strategy of late season moths has a place within the industry, pupae busting is still the best method in seasonal quarantining and has a good fit within the modern cotton industry, particularly given differences in the biology and ecology of <i>H. armigera</i> and <i>H. punctigera</i>, and the presence of dominant resistance to Bt toxins by <i>H. armigera</i> in China.</p>","PeriodicalId":8574,"journal":{"name":"Austral Entomology","volume":"62 4","pages":"392-409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aen.12669","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is ‘pupae busting’ or destroying overwintering pupae of Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) still relevant today in Australian Bt cotton?\",\"authors\":\"Mary E. A. Whitehouse,&nbsp;Colin R. Tann,&nbsp;Michael V. Braunack\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/aen.12669\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Transgenic Bt cotton was developed to control lepidopteran pests like the cotton bollworm, <i>Helicoverpa armigera</i>. However, there was concern that <i>H. armigera</i> would develop resistance to Bt cotton as this species had developed resistance to many insecticides and Bt toxins. To counter resistance, the cotton industry developed a resistance management plan (RMP) that included techniques to block resistant genes surviving from one season to the next (seasonal quarantining). One such technique is pupae busting, where cotton fields are cultivated after harvest, destroying potentially resistant pupating <i>Helicoverpa</i> spp. While pupae busting was important when there was only one insecticidal gene in Bt cotton, is it still relevant now Bt cotton has three insecticidal Bt genes? To address this question, we reviewed the development of pupae busting as a tool and its role in the current RMP. This included examining the ecology and behavioural characteristics of <i>Helicoverpa</i> spp. that impact on pupae busting efficacy (e.g., diapause, pupal mortality and pupae depth); the effect of soil type and different tillage techniques on pupae busting efficacy; and pupae busting within the context of Australia's current cotton farming system. We also looked at alternative forms of seasonal quarantining, such as using bisexual attract-and-kill techniques against adults. We confirmed that soil for pupae busting needs to be checked for moisture, which ideally should be less than the soil plastic limit. Comparisons between reports indicated that under good conditions, ‘go-devils’ and chisel ploughs were excellent pupae busters. While a bisexual attract-and-kill strategy of late season moths has a place within the industry, pupae busting is still the best method in seasonal quarantining and has a good fit within the modern cotton industry, particularly given differences in the biology and ecology of <i>H. armigera</i> and <i>H. punctigera</i>, and the presence of dominant resistance to Bt toxins by <i>H. armigera</i> in China.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8574,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Austral Entomology\",\"volume\":\"62 4\",\"pages\":\"392-409\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/aen.12669\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Austral Entomology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aen.12669\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENTOMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Austral Entomology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/aen.12669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开发转基因 Bt 棉花是为了控制棉铃虫等鳞翅目害虫。然而,人们担心棉铃虫会对 Bt 棉花产生抗药性,因为这种害虫已经对许多杀虫剂和 Bt 毒素产生了抗药性。为了对付抗药性,棉花产业制定了抗药性管理计划(RMP),其中包括阻止抗药性基因从一个季节存活到下一个季节的技术(季节隔离)。其中一项技术是破蛹,即在收获后对棉田进行耕作,消灭可能具有抗性的化蛹 Helicoverpa spp。在 Bt 棉花只有一种杀虫基因时,破蛹非常重要,而现在 Bt 棉花有三种杀虫 Bt 基因,破蛹是否仍有意义?为了解决这个问题,我们回顾了破蛹作为一种工具的发展及其在当前 RMP 中的作用。这包括研究影响破蛹效果的 Helicoverpa spp.的生态学和行为特征(如休眠期、蛹死亡率和蛹深度);土壤类型和不同耕作技术对破蛹效果的影响;以及澳大利亚当前棉花耕作制度下的破蛹。我们还研究了季节性检疫的其他形式,例如针对成虫使用双性诱杀技术。我们确认,用于破蛹的土壤需要检查湿度,理想的湿度应小于土壤可塑性极限。不同报告之间的比较表明,在良好的条件下,"锄地机 "和凿形犁是很好的破蛹工具。虽然晚季蛾的双性诱杀策略在棉花产业中占有一席之地,但破蛹仍是季节性检疫的最佳方法,而且非常适合现代棉花产业,特别是考虑到棉铃虫和刺蛾在生物学和生态学方面的差异,以及中国棉铃虫对 Bt 毒素的抗药性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Is ‘pupae busting’ or destroying overwintering pupae of Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) still relevant today in Australian Bt cotton?

Is ‘pupae busting’ or destroying overwintering pupae of Helicoverpa spp. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) still relevant today in Australian Bt cotton?

Transgenic Bt cotton was developed to control lepidopteran pests like the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera. However, there was concern that H. armigera would develop resistance to Bt cotton as this species had developed resistance to many insecticides and Bt toxins. To counter resistance, the cotton industry developed a resistance management plan (RMP) that included techniques to block resistant genes surviving from one season to the next (seasonal quarantining). One such technique is pupae busting, where cotton fields are cultivated after harvest, destroying potentially resistant pupating Helicoverpa spp. While pupae busting was important when there was only one insecticidal gene in Bt cotton, is it still relevant now Bt cotton has three insecticidal Bt genes? To address this question, we reviewed the development of pupae busting as a tool and its role in the current RMP. This included examining the ecology and behavioural characteristics of Helicoverpa spp. that impact on pupae busting efficacy (e.g., diapause, pupal mortality and pupae depth); the effect of soil type and different tillage techniques on pupae busting efficacy; and pupae busting within the context of Australia's current cotton farming system. We also looked at alternative forms of seasonal quarantining, such as using bisexual attract-and-kill techniques against adults. We confirmed that soil for pupae busting needs to be checked for moisture, which ideally should be less than the soil plastic limit. Comparisons between reports indicated that under good conditions, ‘go-devils’ and chisel ploughs were excellent pupae busters. While a bisexual attract-and-kill strategy of late season moths has a place within the industry, pupae busting is still the best method in seasonal quarantining and has a good fit within the modern cotton industry, particularly given differences in the biology and ecology of H. armigera and H. punctigera, and the presence of dominant resistance to Bt toxins by H. armigera in China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Austral Entomology
Austral Entomology ENTOMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Austral Entomology is a scientific journal of entomology for the Southern Hemisphere. It publishes Original Articles that are peer-reviewed research papers from the study of the behaviour, biology, biosystematics, conservation biology, ecology, evolution, forensic and medical entomology, molecular biology, public health, urban entomology, physiology and the use and control of insects, arachnids and myriapods. The journal also publishes Reviews on research and theory or commentaries on current areas of research, innovation or rapid development likely to be of broad interest – these may be submitted or invited. Book Reviews will also be considered provided the works are of global significance. Manuscripts from authors in the Northern Hemisphere are encouraged provided that the research has relevance to or broad readership within the Southern Hemisphere. All submissions are peer-reviewed by at least two referees expert in the field of the submitted paper. Special issues are encouraged; please contact the Chief Editor for further information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信