廊道设计的影响:老年设施廊道形态的使用者感知调查

IF 3.1 1区 艺术学 0 ARCHITECTURE
Keming Hou , Xinyue Liu , Zhe Kong , Haining Wang , Mingli Lu , Songtao Hu
{"title":"廊道设计的影响:老年设施廊道形态的使用者感知调查","authors":"Keming Hou ,&nbsp;Xinyue Liu ,&nbsp;Zhe Kong ,&nbsp;Haining Wang ,&nbsp;Mingli Lu ,&nbsp;Songtao Hu","doi":"10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The study addresses the issue of monotonous and lengthy corridors with a single spatial form commonly found in Chinese elderly facilities. We aim to assess the influence of the built spatial environment on the emotions of the elderly quantitatively. To do this, Virtual Reality (VR) technology was employed to construct a digital twin model featuring three corridor forms: straight, arc, and folded, respectively. Forty participants experienced walking in each corridor form for 144 s, while electroencephalogram (EEG) data and subjective questionnaires were collected to explore the psychological and physiological effects caused by different corridors. The results of the questionnaire indicate that arc corridor yielded the highest satisfaction, followed by straight corridor, and the satisfaction for folded corridor is the lowest. EEG results show that folded corridor has 26.0% higher average power than arc corridor and 6.6% higher than straight corridor. The participants consume less energy and are more satisfied in arc corridor, compared to straight and folded corridors. The results establish a correlation between spatial form and occupant perception, suggesting that moderate spatial variations contribute to a better experience of the elderly. Moreover, this study provides quantitative cross-referencing information to optimize the design methods of public space in elderly facilities.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51662,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Architectural Research","volume":"12 6","pages":"Pages 1047-1064"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263523000808/pdfft?md5=06fba86fb335f7fed89390406c2d52f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2095263523000808-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impacts of corridor design: An investigation on occupant perception of corridor forms in elderly facilities\",\"authors\":\"Keming Hou ,&nbsp;Xinyue Liu ,&nbsp;Zhe Kong ,&nbsp;Haining Wang ,&nbsp;Mingli Lu ,&nbsp;Songtao Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foar.2023.09.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The study addresses the issue of monotonous and lengthy corridors with a single spatial form commonly found in Chinese elderly facilities. We aim to assess the influence of the built spatial environment on the emotions of the elderly quantitatively. To do this, Virtual Reality (VR) technology was employed to construct a digital twin model featuring three corridor forms: straight, arc, and folded, respectively. Forty participants experienced walking in each corridor form for 144 s, while electroencephalogram (EEG) data and subjective questionnaires were collected to explore the psychological and physiological effects caused by different corridors. The results of the questionnaire indicate that arc corridor yielded the highest satisfaction, followed by straight corridor, and the satisfaction for folded corridor is the lowest. EEG results show that folded corridor has 26.0% higher average power than arc corridor and 6.6% higher than straight corridor. The participants consume less energy and are more satisfied in arc corridor, compared to straight and folded corridors. The results establish a correlation between spatial form and occupant perception, suggesting that moderate spatial variations contribute to a better experience of the elderly. Moreover, this study provides quantitative cross-referencing information to optimize the design methods of public space in elderly facilities.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Architectural Research\",\"volume\":\"12 6\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1047-1064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263523000808/pdfft?md5=06fba86fb335f7fed89390406c2d52f0&pid=1-s2.0-S2095263523000808-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Architectural Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263523000808\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Architectural Research","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2095263523000808","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究以单一的空间形式解决了中国老年设施中常见的走廊单调和冗长的问题。我们的目的是定量评估建成空间环境对老年人情绪的影响。为此,采用虚拟现实(VR)技术构建了具有三种走廊形式的数字孪生模型:直线、弧形和折叠。40名被试分别在不同的走廊形式中行走14s,收集脑电图(EEG)数据和主观问卷,探讨不同走廊对被试的心理和生理影响。问卷调查结果显示,弧形走廊满意度最高,直线走廊次之,折叠式走廊满意度最低。脑电结果表明,折叠走廊比弧形走廊平均功率高26.0%,比直线走廊平均功率高6.6%。与直走廊和折叠走廊相比,弧形走廊消耗的能量更少,参与者更满意。结果表明,空间形式与居住者感知之间存在相关性,表明适度的空间变化有助于老年人获得更好的体验。此外,本研究为优化老年设施公共空间的设计方法提供了定量的交叉参考信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impacts of corridor design: An investigation on occupant perception of corridor forms in elderly facilities

The study addresses the issue of monotonous and lengthy corridors with a single spatial form commonly found in Chinese elderly facilities. We aim to assess the influence of the built spatial environment on the emotions of the elderly quantitatively. To do this, Virtual Reality (VR) technology was employed to construct a digital twin model featuring three corridor forms: straight, arc, and folded, respectively. Forty participants experienced walking in each corridor form for 144 s, while electroencephalogram (EEG) data and subjective questionnaires were collected to explore the psychological and physiological effects caused by different corridors. The results of the questionnaire indicate that arc corridor yielded the highest satisfaction, followed by straight corridor, and the satisfaction for folded corridor is the lowest. EEG results show that folded corridor has 26.0% higher average power than arc corridor and 6.6% higher than straight corridor. The participants consume less energy and are more satisfied in arc corridor, compared to straight and folded corridors. The results establish a correlation between spatial form and occupant perception, suggesting that moderate spatial variations contribute to a better experience of the elderly. Moreover, this study provides quantitative cross-referencing information to optimize the design methods of public space in elderly facilities.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
430
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Architectural Research is an international journal that publishes original research papers, review articles, and case studies to promote rapid communication and exchange among scholars, architects, and engineers. This journal introduces and reviews significant and pioneering achievements in the field of architecture research. Subject areas include the primary branches of architecture, such as architectural design and theory, architectural science and technology, urban planning, landscaping architecture, existing building renovation, and architectural heritage conservation. The journal encourages studies based on a rigorous scientific approach and state-of-the-art technology. All published papers reflect original research works and basic theories, models, computing, and design in architecture. High-quality papers addressing the social aspects of architecture are also welcome. This journal is strictly peer-reviewed and accepts only original manuscripts submitted in English.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信