序贯思想与非线性思想——非线性形而上学的前瞻

Erwin L. Rimban
{"title":"序贯思想与非线性思想——非线性形而上学的前瞻","authors":"Erwin L. Rimban","doi":"10.22259/2642-8415.0501002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This paper explores the fundamental differences between sequential and nonlinear thought processes and their implications for metaphysics. Sequential thought follows a linear, cause-and-effect pattern, while nonlinear thought involves a more complex, holistic approach. The discussion draws from various philosophical and scientific perspectives to analyze the nature and significance of these cognitive processes. The paper argues that nonlinear thought is essential for a comprehensive understanding of reality, particularly in the domain of metaphysics. By highlighting the limitations of sequential thought and the benefits of nonlinear thought, the paper aims to contribute to the development of a more sophisticated and nuanced framework for metaphysical inquiry. Keywords: Sequential thought, nonlinear thought, metaphysics, causality, complexity, holistic, philosophy, science, cognition.","PeriodicalId":317935,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philosophy and Ethics","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sequential Thought versus Nonlinear Thought Prolegomenon to Nonlinear Metaphysics\",\"authors\":\"Erwin L. Rimban\",\"doi\":\"10.22259/2642-8415.0501002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This paper explores the fundamental differences between sequential and nonlinear thought processes and their implications for metaphysics. Sequential thought follows a linear, cause-and-effect pattern, while nonlinear thought involves a more complex, holistic approach. The discussion draws from various philosophical and scientific perspectives to analyze the nature and significance of these cognitive processes. The paper argues that nonlinear thought is essential for a comprehensive understanding of reality, particularly in the domain of metaphysics. By highlighting the limitations of sequential thought and the benefits of nonlinear thought, the paper aims to contribute to the development of a more sophisticated and nuanced framework for metaphysical inquiry. Keywords: Sequential thought, nonlinear thought, metaphysics, causality, complexity, holistic, philosophy, science, cognition.\",\"PeriodicalId\":317935,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Philosophy and Ethics\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Philosophy and Ethics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22259/2642-8415.0501002\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philosophy and Ethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22259/2642-8415.0501002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要本文探讨了顺序思维过程与非线性思维过程的根本区别及其对形而上学的启示。顺序思维遵循线性、因果模式,而非线性思维则涉及更复杂、更全面的方法。讨论从不同的哲学和科学角度来分析这些认知过程的本质和意义。本文认为,非线性思想对于全面理解现实,特别是在形而上学领域是必不可少的。通过强调顺序思维的局限性和非线性思维的好处,本文旨在为形而上学探究的更复杂和细致的框架的发展做出贡献。关键词:顺序思维、非线性思维、形而上学、因果关系、复杂性、整体性、哲学、科学、认知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sequential Thought versus Nonlinear Thought Prolegomenon to Nonlinear Metaphysics
Abstract This paper explores the fundamental differences between sequential and nonlinear thought processes and their implications for metaphysics. Sequential thought follows a linear, cause-and-effect pattern, while nonlinear thought involves a more complex, holistic approach. The discussion draws from various philosophical and scientific perspectives to analyze the nature and significance of these cognitive processes. The paper argues that nonlinear thought is essential for a comprehensive understanding of reality, particularly in the domain of metaphysics. By highlighting the limitations of sequential thought and the benefits of nonlinear thought, the paper aims to contribute to the development of a more sophisticated and nuanced framework for metaphysical inquiry. Keywords: Sequential thought, nonlinear thought, metaphysics, causality, complexity, holistic, philosophy, science, cognition.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信