摩尔悖论的美德可靠解

IF 1.3 1区哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Synthese Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1007/s11229-023-04392-z

Jaakko Hirvelä

{"title":"摩尔悖论的美德可靠解","authors":"Jaakko Hirvelä","doi":"10.1007/s11229-023-04392-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Most of the literature surrounding virtue reliabilism revolves around issues pertaining to the analysis of knowledge. With the exception of the lottery paradox, virtue reliabilists have paid relatively little attention to classic epistemological paradoxes, such as Moore’s paradox. This is a significant omission given how central role such paradoxes have in epistemic theorizing. In this essay I take a step towards remedying this shortcoming by providing a solution to Moore’s paradox. The solution that I offer stems directly from the core of virtue reliabilism.","PeriodicalId":49452,"journal":{"name":"Synthese","volume":"34 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A virtue reliabilist solution to moore’s paradox\",\"authors\":\"Jaakko Hirvelä\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11229-023-04392-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Most of the literature surrounding virtue reliabilism revolves around issues pertaining to the analysis of knowledge. With the exception of the lottery paradox, virtue reliabilists have paid relatively little attention to classic epistemological paradoxes, such as Moore’s paradox. This is a significant omission given how central role such paradoxes have in epistemic theorizing. In this essay I take a step towards remedying this shortcoming by providing a solution to Moore’s paradox. The solution that I offer stems directly from the core of virtue reliabilism.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49452,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Synthese\",\"volume\":\"34 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Synthese\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04392-z\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Synthese","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-023-04392-z","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

关于美德可靠论的大部分文献都围绕着与知识分析有关的问题展开。除了彩票悖论，美德可靠论者很少关注经典的认识论悖论，比如摩尔悖论。考虑到这些悖论在认识论理论化中的核心作用，这是一个重大的遗漏。在这篇文章中，我将通过提供摩尔悖论的解决方案来弥补这一缺点。我提供的解决方案直接源于美德可靠性的核心。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

A virtue reliabilist solution to moore’s paradox

Abstract Most of the literature surrounding virtue reliabilism revolves around issues pertaining to the analysis of knowledge. With the exception of the lottery paradox, virtue reliabilists have paid relatively little attention to classic epistemological paradoxes, such as Moore’s paradox. This is a significant omission given how central role such paradoxes have in epistemic theorizing. In this essay I take a step towards remedying this shortcoming by providing a solution to Moore’s paradox. The solution that I offer stems directly from the core of virtue reliabilism.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Synthese 管理科学-科学史与科学哲学

CiteScore

3.30

自引率

13.30%

发文量

471

审稿时长

1 months

期刊介绍： Synthese is a philosophy journal focusing on contemporary issues in epistemology, philosophy of science, and related fields. More specifically, we divide our areas of interest into four groups: (1) epistemology, methodology, and philosophy of science, all broadly understood. (2) The foundations of logic and mathematics, where ‘logic’, ‘mathematics’, and ‘foundations’ are all broadly understood. (3) Formal methods in philosophy, including methods connecting philosophy to other academic fields. (4) Issues in ethics and the history and sociology of logic, mathematics, and science that contribute to the contemporary studies Synthese focuses on, as described in (1)-(3) above.