振兴新一代的音乐教育:通过Dalcroze, Orff和Kodály方法的比较分析导航流行音乐教学之路及其启示

Yaojia Liu
{"title":"振兴新一代的音乐教育:通过Dalcroze, Orff和Kodály方法的比较分析导航流行音乐教学之路及其启示","authors":"Yaojia Liu","doi":"10.52152/kuey.v29i4.961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The provision of music education is deeply ingrained in the cultural legacies of many countries across the globe, including China. It is essential to improve the music education system in order to better serve the demands of modern students, since the number of beginning musicians continues to rise. This study's main goal is to investigate reforms in music education through a comparative analysis of three essential music education systems, with a particular emphasis on popular music pedagogy. The study explores the field of music education in China, focusing on the Kodály, Orff, and Dalcroze approaches. There are similarities between these approaches, including the focus on collaborative learning, the development of musical literacy, and the encouragement of active learning. They are especially relevant in the context of Chinese education since they are consistent with cultural norms. However, there are differences in how they have developed historically and how they have been incorporated into the Chinese educational system. This evaluation stands out for highlighting the difficulties that music education institutions encounter, particularly with regard to the availability of resources and teacher preparation. In addition, a key component of the reform goal is the inclusion of contemporary musical genres in popular music education. This study explains the similarities, differences, and implications for China's music education environment by carefully examining these approaches and doing a methodical analysis of the body of available research.","PeriodicalId":222532,"journal":{"name":"Eğitim Yönetimi","volume":"12 10","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revitalizing Music Education for New Generations: Navigating the Path of Popular Music Pedagogy Through Comparative Analysis of Dalcroze, Orff, and Kodály Methodologies and Their Implications\",\"authors\":\"Yaojia Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.52152/kuey.v29i4.961\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The provision of music education is deeply ingrained in the cultural legacies of many countries across the globe, including China. It is essential to improve the music education system in order to better serve the demands of modern students, since the number of beginning musicians continues to rise. This study's main goal is to investigate reforms in music education through a comparative analysis of three essential music education systems, with a particular emphasis on popular music pedagogy. The study explores the field of music education in China, focusing on the Kodály, Orff, and Dalcroze approaches. There are similarities between these approaches, including the focus on collaborative learning, the development of musical literacy, and the encouragement of active learning. They are especially relevant in the context of Chinese education since they are consistent with cultural norms. However, there are differences in how they have developed historically and how they have been incorporated into the Chinese educational system. This evaluation stands out for highlighting the difficulties that music education institutions encounter, particularly with regard to the availability of resources and teacher preparation. In addition, a key component of the reform goal is the inclusion of contemporary musical genres in popular music education. This study explains the similarities, differences, and implications for China's music education environment by carefully examining these approaches and doing a methodical analysis of the body of available research.\",\"PeriodicalId\":222532,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eğitim Yönetimi\",\"volume\":\"12 10\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eğitim Yönetimi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52152/kuey.v29i4.961\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eğitim Yönetimi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52152/kuey.v29i4.961","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

提供音乐教育在全球许多国家的文化遗产中根深蒂固,包括中国。由于初级音乐家的人数不断增加,为了更好地满足现代学生的需求,有必要完善音乐教育体系。本研究的主要目标是通过对三种基本音乐教育体系的比较分析来调查音乐教育的改革,特别强调流行音乐教学法。本研究以Kodály、Orff和Dalcroze为研究对象,探讨了中国的音乐教育。这些方法之间有相似之处,包括注重合作学习,音乐素养的发展,以及鼓励主动学习。它们与中国的教育背景特别相关,因为它们符合文化规范。然而,它们在历史上如何发展以及如何融入中国教育体系方面存在差异。这项评估突出了音乐教育机构遇到的困难,特别是在资源的可用性和教师准备方面。此外,改革目标的一个关键组成部分是将当代音乐类型纳入流行音乐教育。本研究通过仔细研究这些方法,并对现有研究进行系统分析,解释了中国音乐教育环境的异同和影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Revitalizing Music Education for New Generations: Navigating the Path of Popular Music Pedagogy Through Comparative Analysis of Dalcroze, Orff, and Kodály Methodologies and Their Implications
The provision of music education is deeply ingrained in the cultural legacies of many countries across the globe, including China. It is essential to improve the music education system in order to better serve the demands of modern students, since the number of beginning musicians continues to rise. This study's main goal is to investigate reforms in music education through a comparative analysis of three essential music education systems, with a particular emphasis on popular music pedagogy. The study explores the field of music education in China, focusing on the Kodály, Orff, and Dalcroze approaches. There are similarities between these approaches, including the focus on collaborative learning, the development of musical literacy, and the encouragement of active learning. They are especially relevant in the context of Chinese education since they are consistent with cultural norms. However, there are differences in how they have developed historically and how they have been incorporated into the Chinese educational system. This evaluation stands out for highlighting the difficulties that music education institutions encounter, particularly with regard to the availability of resources and teacher preparation. In addition, a key component of the reform goal is the inclusion of contemporary musical genres in popular music education. This study explains the similarities, differences, and implications for China's music education environment by carefully examining these approaches and doing a methodical analysis of the body of available research.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信