{"title":"在教育背景下识别女孩自闭症:反思内部表现和诊断标准","authors":"Aoife Munroe, Michele Dunleavy","doi":"10.1080/03323315.2023.2260371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely acknowledged that girls are less likely to receive an autism diagnosis compared to boys (Gould, J. 2017. “Towards Understanding the Under-Recognition of Girls and Women on the Autism Spectrum.” Autism 21 (6): 703–705), with growing recognition that girls are underserved by the current clinical diagnostic criteria, potentially due to differences in presentation (Duvekot, J., J. van der Ende, F. C. Verhulst, G. Slappendel, E. van Daalen, A. Maras, and K. Greaves-Lord. 2017. “Factors Influencing the Probability of a Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Girls Versus Boys.” Autism 21 (6): 646–658). Lack of awareness of the female profile of autism among teachers and other professionals can have implications in terms of recognition, diagnostic referrals, formal identification and support. A narrative review approach was adopted to review extant literature pertinent to sex differences in autism, using the diagnostic criteria outlined in DSM-5 as a framework (American Psychiatric Association. Citation2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association). The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the varied presentation exhibited by some autistic girls. The findings reveal differences in the presentation of autism characteristics among girls with a more internal presentation apparent. The findings of the review indicate the need for revisions to diagnostic tools to reflect the more nuanced female presentation, increased training and guidance for professionals working with autistic girls and continued research. It is hoped that this review will further knowledge in this area to support the recognition of autism in females and mitigate the risk of females being missed, misdiagnosed or diagnosed later in life.","PeriodicalId":46076,"journal":{"name":"Irish Educational Studies","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recognising autism in girls within the education context: reflecting on the internal presentation and the diagnostic criteria\",\"authors\":\"Aoife Munroe, Michele Dunleavy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03323315.2023.2260371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is widely acknowledged that girls are less likely to receive an autism diagnosis compared to boys (Gould, J. 2017. “Towards Understanding the Under-Recognition of Girls and Women on the Autism Spectrum.” Autism 21 (6): 703–705), with growing recognition that girls are underserved by the current clinical diagnostic criteria, potentially due to differences in presentation (Duvekot, J., J. van der Ende, F. C. Verhulst, G. Slappendel, E. van Daalen, A. Maras, and K. Greaves-Lord. 2017. “Factors Influencing the Probability of a Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Girls Versus Boys.” Autism 21 (6): 646–658). Lack of awareness of the female profile of autism among teachers and other professionals can have implications in terms of recognition, diagnostic referrals, formal identification and support. A narrative review approach was adopted to review extant literature pertinent to sex differences in autism, using the diagnostic criteria outlined in DSM-5 as a framework (American Psychiatric Association. Citation2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association). The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the varied presentation exhibited by some autistic girls. The findings reveal differences in the presentation of autism characteristics among girls with a more internal presentation apparent. The findings of the review indicate the need for revisions to diagnostic tools to reflect the more nuanced female presentation, increased training and guidance for professionals working with autistic girls and continued research. It is hoped that this review will further knowledge in this area to support the recognition of autism in females and mitigate the risk of females being missed, misdiagnosed or diagnosed later in life.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Irish Educational Studies\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Irish Educational Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2260371\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Irish Educational Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2023.2260371","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人们普遍认为,与男孩相比,女孩接受自闭症诊断的可能性更小(Gould, J. 2017)。“了解对自闭症谱系中女孩和妇女的认识不足。”自闭症21(6):703-705),随着越来越多的人认识到目前的临床诊断标准对女孩的服务不足,可能是由于表现上的差异(Duvekot, J. van der Ende, F. C. Verhulst, G. Slappendel, E. van Daalen, A. Maras, K. Greaves-Lord)。2017. 影响女孩与男孩自闭症谱系障碍诊断可能性的因素自闭症21(6):646-658。教师和其他专业人员缺乏对女性自闭症特征的认识,可能会在识别、诊断转诊、正式鉴定和支持方面产生影响。以美国精神病学协会(American Psychiatric Association)在DSM-5中概述的诊断标准为框架,采用叙述回顾的方法来回顾与自闭症性别差异有关的现有文献。Citation2013。《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》,第5版。华盛顿:美国精神病学协会)。本文的目的是提高人们对一些自闭症女孩所表现出的各种表现的认识。研究结果揭示了女孩在自闭症特征表现上的差异,更明显的是内在表现。审查的结果表明,需要修订诊断工具,以反映更细微的女性表现,增加对自闭症女孩的专业人员的培训和指导,并继续研究。希望这篇综述将进一步加深这一领域的知识,以支持对女性自闭症的认识,并降低女性在以后的生活中被遗漏、误诊或诊断的风险。
Recognising autism in girls within the education context: reflecting on the internal presentation and the diagnostic criteria
It is widely acknowledged that girls are less likely to receive an autism diagnosis compared to boys (Gould, J. 2017. “Towards Understanding the Under-Recognition of Girls and Women on the Autism Spectrum.” Autism 21 (6): 703–705), with growing recognition that girls are underserved by the current clinical diagnostic criteria, potentially due to differences in presentation (Duvekot, J., J. van der Ende, F. C. Verhulst, G. Slappendel, E. van Daalen, A. Maras, and K. Greaves-Lord. 2017. “Factors Influencing the Probability of a Diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder in Girls Versus Boys.” Autism 21 (6): 646–658). Lack of awareness of the female profile of autism among teachers and other professionals can have implications in terms of recognition, diagnostic referrals, formal identification and support. A narrative review approach was adopted to review extant literature pertinent to sex differences in autism, using the diagnostic criteria outlined in DSM-5 as a framework (American Psychiatric Association. Citation2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Washington: American Psychiatric Association). The aim of this paper is to raise awareness of the varied presentation exhibited by some autistic girls. The findings reveal differences in the presentation of autism characteristics among girls with a more internal presentation apparent. The findings of the review indicate the need for revisions to diagnostic tools to reflect the more nuanced female presentation, increased training and guidance for professionals working with autistic girls and continued research. It is hoped that this review will further knowledge in this area to support the recognition of autism in females and mitigate the risk of females being missed, misdiagnosed or diagnosed later in life.