修正建筑形状压力系数分布的数值研究

IF 0.6 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Siti Rohani Mohd Isdris, Shaharudin Shah Zaini, Mohammad Hafifi Hafiz Ishaik, Mohammad Sharizal Abdul Aziz, Noorhazlinda Abd Rahman
{"title":"修正建筑形状压力系数分布的数值研究","authors":"Siti Rohani Mohd Isdris, Shaharudin Shah Zaini, Mohammad Hafifi Hafiz Ishaik, Mohammad Sharizal Abdul Aziz, Noorhazlinda Abd Rahman","doi":"10.47836/pjst.31.6.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The construction of tall buildings in urban areas has grown in number in recent years. However, architects and engineers face a variety of design challenges due to the variety of heights and shapes of new building designs. This study evaluates the impact of shape mitigation on tall buildings by applying corner modifications, such as chamfered, corner cut, plan changes with height, tapered, and setback, and combining a single modification model. The numerical simulations were carried out using Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation with the RNG k-ε type of turbulence model. All single modifications reduced the maximum +C<i><sub>p</sub></i> and -C<i><sub>p</sub></i> better than the basic model. The corner-cut model was the most effective method for reducing the suction effect. Combining the setback, chamfering the corner, and twisting the building model at 45° modification was the most effective approach to reduce the maximum +C<i><sub>p</sub></i> in the 25–42.10% range in Face 1. Modifying a square model with the combination of setback, chamfer, and 45° rotation reduced the maximum -C<i><sub>p</sub></i>, ranging from 36.9–50%. The composite 1 model and composite 2 model reduced the suction effect in the range of 15.38–33.33% in Face 3. The adoption of composite modification was insignificant in reducing the suction effect on the sidewall, where the maximum -C<i><sub>p</sub></i> was recorded to be between 3.62–5.43%.","PeriodicalId":46234,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Numerical Investigation on the Distribution of Pressure Coefficients of Modified Building Shapes\",\"authors\":\"Siti Rohani Mohd Isdris, Shaharudin Shah Zaini, Mohammad Hafifi Hafiz Ishaik, Mohammad Sharizal Abdul Aziz, Noorhazlinda Abd Rahman\",\"doi\":\"10.47836/pjst.31.6.28\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The construction of tall buildings in urban areas has grown in number in recent years. However, architects and engineers face a variety of design challenges due to the variety of heights and shapes of new building designs. This study evaluates the impact of shape mitigation on tall buildings by applying corner modifications, such as chamfered, corner cut, plan changes with height, tapered, and setback, and combining a single modification model. The numerical simulations were carried out using Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation with the RNG k-ε type of turbulence model. All single modifications reduced the maximum +C<i><sub>p</sub></i> and -C<i><sub>p</sub></i> better than the basic model. The corner-cut model was the most effective method for reducing the suction effect. Combining the setback, chamfering the corner, and twisting the building model at 45° modification was the most effective approach to reduce the maximum +C<i><sub>p</sub></i> in the 25–42.10% range in Face 1. Modifying a square model with the combination of setback, chamfer, and 45° rotation reduced the maximum -C<i><sub>p</sub></i>, ranging from 36.9–50%. The composite 1 model and composite 2 model reduced the suction effect in the range of 15.38–33.33% in Face 3. The adoption of composite modification was insignificant in reducing the suction effect on the sidewall, where the maximum -C<i><sub>p</sub></i> was recorded to be between 3.62–5.43%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.31.6.28\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.31.6.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,在城市地区建造高层建筑的数量有所增加。然而,由于新建筑设计的高度和形状的变化,建筑师和工程师面临着各种各样的设计挑战。本研究结合单一修正模型,通过角化、角化、平面随高度变化、变细、退缩等角化修正,评估形状缓和对高层建筑的影响。数值模拟采用RNG k-ε型湍流模型进行计算流体力学(CFD)模拟。所有单次修改都降低了最大值+C<i><sub> </sub></i>和-C< i> & lt; sub>术中;/ sub> & lt; / i>比基本款好。切角模型是降低吸力效果最有效的方法。结合后退、倒角和扭转45°修改的建筑模型是减少最大+C<i><sub>p</sub></i>在25-42.10%范围内。用倒退、倒角和45°旋转的组合来修改方形模型,最大减少了-C<i><sub>p</sub></i>,范围从36.9-50%。复合1模型和复合2模型对面3吸力的降低幅度在15.38 ~ 33.33%之间。采用复合材料改性对降低侧壁吸力影响不显著,其中-C<i><sub>p</sub></i>在3.62-5.43%之间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Numerical Investigation on the Distribution of Pressure Coefficients of Modified Building Shapes
The construction of tall buildings in urban areas has grown in number in recent years. However, architects and engineers face a variety of design challenges due to the variety of heights and shapes of new building designs. This study evaluates the impact of shape mitigation on tall buildings by applying corner modifications, such as chamfered, corner cut, plan changes with height, tapered, and setback, and combining a single modification model. The numerical simulations were carried out using Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) simulation with the RNG k-ε type of turbulence model. All single modifications reduced the maximum +Cp and -Cp better than the basic model. The corner-cut model was the most effective method for reducing the suction effect. Combining the setback, chamfering the corner, and twisting the building model at 45° modification was the most effective approach to reduce the maximum +Cp in the 25–42.10% range in Face 1. Modifying a square model with the combination of setback, chamfer, and 45° rotation reduced the maximum -Cp, ranging from 36.9–50%. The composite 1 model and composite 2 model reduced the suction effect in the range of 15.38–33.33% in Face 3. The adoption of composite modification was insignificant in reducing the suction effect on the sidewall, where the maximum -Cp was recorded to be between 3.62–5.43%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology aims to provide a forum for high quality research related to science and engineering research. Areas relevant to the scope of the journal include: bioinformatics, bioscience, biotechnology and bio-molecular sciences, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, engineering design, environmental control and management, mathematics and statistics, medicine and health sciences, nanotechnology, physics, safety and emergency management, and related fields of study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信