脊髓阻滞充分性评估

Anastasiya I. Levina
{"title":"脊髓阻滞充分性评估","authors":"Anastasiya I. Levina","doi":"10.20310/2782-5019-2023-5-3-59-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research presents a literature analysis of methods for evaluating the effec-tiveness of spinal anesthesia. The purpose of this analysis is to draw the attention of anesthesiologists to the issue of assessing the adequacy of neuraxial blockade and, in particular, spinal anesthesia, as the most commonly performed anesthetic management of surgical interventions. The adequacy of spinal anesthesia implies a pronounced motor block, which allows achieving complete relaxation of the muscles of the lower extremities and, if necessary, the muscles of the anterior abdominal wall, as well as the loss of pain, temperature and, as the most optimal level, this is the loss of tactile sensitivity. Considered methods for assessing motor, sensory and sympathetic blockade are P.R. Bromage scale to assess motor block, assessment of temperature and pain sensitivity (test with an ice tube, so-called Cold-test, test for pain sensitivity of the skin pin-prick). Until recently, in anesthesia practice, insufficient attention was paid to assessing the level of sympathetic blockade. The research describes an alternative method for assessing this type of blockade: laser doppler flowmetry. The quality and adequacy of spinal anesthesia will depend on the level and severity of these types of blockades.","PeriodicalId":199692,"journal":{"name":"Tambov Medical Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of spinal block adequacy\",\"authors\":\"Anastasiya I. Levina\",\"doi\":\"10.20310/2782-5019-2023-5-3-59-66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research presents a literature analysis of methods for evaluating the effec-tiveness of spinal anesthesia. The purpose of this analysis is to draw the attention of anesthesiologists to the issue of assessing the adequacy of neuraxial blockade and, in particular, spinal anesthesia, as the most commonly performed anesthetic management of surgical interventions. The adequacy of spinal anesthesia implies a pronounced motor block, which allows achieving complete relaxation of the muscles of the lower extremities and, if necessary, the muscles of the anterior abdominal wall, as well as the loss of pain, temperature and, as the most optimal level, this is the loss of tactile sensitivity. Considered methods for assessing motor, sensory and sympathetic blockade are P.R. Bromage scale to assess motor block, assessment of temperature and pain sensitivity (test with an ice tube, so-called Cold-test, test for pain sensitivity of the skin pin-prick). Until recently, in anesthesia practice, insufficient attention was paid to assessing the level of sympathetic blockade. The research describes an alternative method for assessing this type of blockade: laser doppler flowmetry. The quality and adequacy of spinal anesthesia will depend on the level and severity of these types of blockades.\",\"PeriodicalId\":199692,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tambov Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tambov Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20310/2782-5019-2023-5-3-59-66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tambov Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20310/2782-5019-2023-5-3-59-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究对评估脊髓麻醉有效性的方法进行文献分析。本分析的目的是提请麻醉医师注意评估神经轴阻滞的充分性问题,特别是脊髓麻醉,作为手术干预中最常用的麻醉管理。充分的脊髓麻醉意味着明显的运动阻滞,这允许实现下肢肌肉的完全放松,必要时,腹前壁肌肉的放松,以及疼痛和温度的丧失,作为最理想的水平,这是触觉敏感性的丧失。评估运动、感觉和交感阻滞的常用方法有P.R. Bromage量表,用于评估运动阻滞,评估温度和疼痛敏感性(用冰管测试,所谓的cold测试,皮肤针刺疼痛敏感性测试)。直到最近,在麻醉实践中,对交感阻滞水平的评估还不够重视。该研究描述了一种评估这种阻塞的替代方法:激光多普勒血流法。脊髓麻醉的质量和充分性取决于这些阻塞的程度和严重程度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessment of spinal block adequacy
This research presents a literature analysis of methods for evaluating the effec-tiveness of spinal anesthesia. The purpose of this analysis is to draw the attention of anesthesiologists to the issue of assessing the adequacy of neuraxial blockade and, in particular, spinal anesthesia, as the most commonly performed anesthetic management of surgical interventions. The adequacy of spinal anesthesia implies a pronounced motor block, which allows achieving complete relaxation of the muscles of the lower extremities and, if necessary, the muscles of the anterior abdominal wall, as well as the loss of pain, temperature and, as the most optimal level, this is the loss of tactile sensitivity. Considered methods for assessing motor, sensory and sympathetic blockade are P.R. Bromage scale to assess motor block, assessment of temperature and pain sensitivity (test with an ice tube, so-called Cold-test, test for pain sensitivity of the skin pin-prick). Until recently, in anesthesia practice, insufficient attention was paid to assessing the level of sympathetic blockade. The research describes an alternative method for assessing this type of blockade: laser doppler flowmetry. The quality and adequacy of spinal anesthesia will depend on the level and severity of these types of blockades.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信