{"title":"发展对伊朗农村和城市治理影响的历史概述","authors":"Mostafa Azkia, Hossein Imani Jajarmi","doi":"10.1080/19436149.2023.2268881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The constitutional revolution in 1906 was the beginning of a new era for Iran. A national parliament was established for making laws that established modern institutions such as city and village councils and mayors over the decades. Urban governance was renewed and the land reforms in the 1960s transformed rural governance, changed landlord– peasant relations and reduced the traditional authority of village headman (kadkhodas) in village administration. The 1979 revolution introduced a new kind of local governance, Islamic councils for governing cities and villages. This article discusses the main changes and challenges of local governance in Iran by using theoretical concepts of dependent development. The changing pattern of authority and penetration of state bureaucracy through the creation of several rural and urban organizations before and after the Revolution of 1979 is discussed. The article also explains how the establishments of these rural and urban institutions have helped to increase the domination of the state officials within both cities and villages.Key Words: BureaucracycentralismdevelopmentgovernanceIran Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Fernando Henrique Cardoso & Enzo Faletto (Citation1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press).2 John Foran (Citation1999) Fragile Resistance: A History of Social Transformations in Iran, From the Safavid Era to the Years Following the Islamic Revolution [Persian translation by A. Tadayon] (Tehran: RASA Institute for Cultural Services), p. 288.3 Hossein Mahdavi (Citation1970) The Pattern and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran, in: M.A. Cook (ed.), Studies in Economic History of the Middle East from the Rise of Islam to the Present Day, p. 258 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).4 Mohsen Modir Shanehchi (Citation2000) Centralism and Underdevelopment in Contemporary Iran, p. 361 (Tehran : RASA Institute for Cultural Services).5 Ibid, p. 31.6 Homa Katouzian (Citation1993 (Political Economy of Iran, vol. 2. [Persian translation by M. R. Nafisi and K. Azizi], pp. 4–53 (Tehran: Papirus Publications).7 Ali Asghar Shamim (Citation1992) Iran in Ghajarid Era: 13th Century to the First Half of the 14th Lunar Century, p. 223 (Tehran: Elmi Publications).8 A. S. Malikof (Citation1979) The Establishment of Reza Khan Dictatorship in Iran [Persian translation by S. Irani], p. 66 (Tehran: the Pocket books Company).9 Fred Halliday (Citation1979) Iran, Dictatorship and Development [Persian translation by M. Yalghani and A. Tolou], p. 24 (Tehran: Elm Publications).10 Foran, op. cit., p. 339.11 Ervand Abrahamian (Citation1998) Iran Between Two Revolutions [Persian translation by A. Golmohammadi and M. A. Fatahi], p. 541 (Tehran: Nashr-e Ney Publications).12 Katouzian, “Political Economy,” p. 225.13 Jahangir Amouzgar (Citation1996) The Rise and Fall of Pahlavi Dynasty [Persian translation by A. Lotfian], p. 321 (Tehran: The Center of Book Translation and Publications).14 Fereydoun Kamran (Citation1995) Rural Development and Planning, p. 20 (Tehran: Avay-e Nour Publications).15 Abdol Ali Lahsaeizadeh (Citation1998) Sociological Study of Rural Management in Iran, in: Papers’ Collection for the First Conference on Sociology and Management, p. 403 (Tehran: Industrial Management Organization).16 Foran, ibid, p. 339.17 Ibid, p. 193.18 Fatemeh E. Moghadam (Citation1996) From Land Reform to Revolution, the Politics of Agricultural Development in Iran, 1962–1979, p. 193 (London: Tanris).19 Preamble of the Constitution: The Constitution guarantees the negation of any form of intellectual and social oppression and economic monopoly and tries to break away from the dictatorial system so as to place the destiny of people in their own hands.- Article 44 divides the economy into three sections of government, cooperatives, and the private sector:-Article 7 related with the councils.-Article 100: With a view to expending the speedy implementation of social, economic, development, health, cultural and educational plans and other welfare affairs, the management of the affairs of each village, district, city, town or province shall be carried out with the cooperation of the people, and with due consideration to the local needs, under the supervision of a Council known as Village, District, City, Town or Provincial Council whose members shall be elected by the people of the same locality.-Article 102: The High Council of the Provinces shall be allowed, within the scope of its functions, to draw up bills and propose them to the National Parliament (5) either directly or through the Government.20 Institute for Social Studies and Research of University of Tehran (Citation1974) Socio- Economic Studies of Farm Corporation in Six Regions of Iran (Tehran: Institute for Social Studies and Research Publications).21 Mostafa Azkia (Citation2016) Sociology of Development and Under Development of Rural Iran, p. 435 (Tehran: Etla′at Publications).22 Ali Shakoori (Citation2019) Rural Development in Iran: A Survey of Policies and Outcomes, Journal of Developing Societies, 35 (3), p. 347.23 Abrahamian, “Iran Between Two Revolutions,” p. 29.24 Hesbat has a historical past and was an important institution for daily life order in Islamic cities. A text from the thirteenth century, Ayeen-i Hesbat [Municipal Regulations] lists the Mohtaseb’s duties: Responsibility for urban businesses supervision and inspection. He must prevent cheating and fraud in business and guide merchants to act according to Islamic orders (for more information see Ibn-e- Ekhvah (Citation1988) Municipal Regulations in the 7th Century (Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publications).25 Saadodin Rooshdiye (Citation1964) Urban Development and Urban Planning in Iran (Tehran: Iran Municipalities Association Press).26 Seyed Mohsen Habibi (Citation1997) From Old City to City: A Historical Analysis of the Concept of City (Tehran: University of Tehran Press).27 Mosstafa Keeyani (Citation2007) The First Pahlavi’s Architecture (Tehran: Institute for Contemporary Historical Studies).28 Bernard Hourcade (Citation2009) Tehran of Alborz [Persian translation by S. Sahami] (Mashhad: Mohaghegh and Tarane Publications).29 Institute for Social Studies and Research of University of Tehran (Citation1964) Lectures and Reports from the First Seminar on Tehran’ Social Problems (Tehran: Institute for Social Studies and Research Publications).30 Ahmad Ashraf & Ali Banuazizi (Citation2008) Social Classes, State and Revolution in Iran [Persian translation by S. Torabi Farsani] (Tehran: Niloofar Publications).31 Seyed Mohammad Hossein Mirabolghasemi (Citation2003) Taleghani, A Roar in Silence: A Short Research in Life and Thoughts of Ayatollah Taleghani (Tehran: Enteshar Publications).32 Hossein Imani Jajarmi & Mostafa Azkia (Citation2009) Challenges for Local Democracy in Iran: A Study of Islamic City Councils, Middle East Critique, 18(2), pp. 145–159.33 Azkia, “Sociology of Development,” p. 426.34 Ali Shakoori (Citation2006) People’s Participation in Post-revolution Rural Reforms in Iran, Journal of Rural Development, 25 (3), pp. 420–421.35 Shakoori, “People Participation,” p. 420.36 Simin Fadaeei (Citation2018) The Long Twentieth Century in Iran: Dynamics of Change, Continuity and Mobilizing Master Frames, Journal of Developing Societies, 34(2), pp. 1–21.37 Kaveh Ehsani (Citation2006) Rural Society and Agricultural Development in Post-Revolution Iran: The First Two Decades, Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 15(1), p. 78.38 For more detail, see Ahamd Ashraf (Citation1985) The State, Classes and Mode of Mobilization in the Iranian Revolution, State, Culture, and Society,1(3), pp. 277–311; Ehsani, “Rural Society,” pp. 79–96; Ali Asghar Saeidi (Citation2004) The Accountability of Para-Governmental Organization (Bonyads): The Case of Iranian Foundations, Iranian Studies,37(3), pp. 479–498; and Ali Farazmand (Citation1989) The State, Bureaucracy and Revolution in Modern Iran: Agrarian Reform and Regime Politics (New York: Praeger).","PeriodicalId":44822,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Critique","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Historical Overview of Development’s Impact on Rural and Urban Governance in Iran\",\"authors\":\"Mostafa Azkia, Hossein Imani Jajarmi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19436149.2023.2268881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:The constitutional revolution in 1906 was the beginning of a new era for Iran. A national parliament was established for making laws that established modern institutions such as city and village councils and mayors over the decades. Urban governance was renewed and the land reforms in the 1960s transformed rural governance, changed landlord– peasant relations and reduced the traditional authority of village headman (kadkhodas) in village administration. The 1979 revolution introduced a new kind of local governance, Islamic councils for governing cities and villages. This article discusses the main changes and challenges of local governance in Iran by using theoretical concepts of dependent development. The changing pattern of authority and penetration of state bureaucracy through the creation of several rural and urban organizations before and after the Revolution of 1979 is discussed. The article also explains how the establishments of these rural and urban institutions have helped to increase the domination of the state officials within both cities and villages.Key Words: BureaucracycentralismdevelopmentgovernanceIran Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Fernando Henrique Cardoso & Enzo Faletto (Citation1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press).2 John Foran (Citation1999) Fragile Resistance: A History of Social Transformations in Iran, From the Safavid Era to the Years Following the Islamic Revolution [Persian translation by A. Tadayon] (Tehran: RASA Institute for Cultural Services), p. 288.3 Hossein Mahdavi (Citation1970) The Pattern and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran, in: M.A. Cook (ed.), Studies in Economic History of the Middle East from the Rise of Islam to the Present Day, p. 258 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).4 Mohsen Modir Shanehchi (Citation2000) Centralism and Underdevelopment in Contemporary Iran, p. 361 (Tehran : RASA Institute for Cultural Services).5 Ibid, p. 31.6 Homa Katouzian (Citation1993 (Political Economy of Iran, vol. 2. [Persian translation by M. R. Nafisi and K. Azizi], pp. 4–53 (Tehran: Papirus Publications).7 Ali Asghar Shamim (Citation1992) Iran in Ghajarid Era: 13th Century to the First Half of the 14th Lunar Century, p. 223 (Tehran: Elmi Publications).8 A. S. Malikof (Citation1979) The Establishment of Reza Khan Dictatorship in Iran [Persian translation by S. Irani], p. 66 (Tehran: the Pocket books Company).9 Fred Halliday (Citation1979) Iran, Dictatorship and Development [Persian translation by M. Yalghani and A. Tolou], p. 24 (Tehran: Elm Publications).10 Foran, op. cit., p. 339.11 Ervand Abrahamian (Citation1998) Iran Between Two Revolutions [Persian translation by A. Golmohammadi and M. A. Fatahi], p. 541 (Tehran: Nashr-e Ney Publications).12 Katouzian, “Political Economy,” p. 225.13 Jahangir Amouzgar (Citation1996) The Rise and Fall of Pahlavi Dynasty [Persian translation by A. Lotfian], p. 321 (Tehran: The Center of Book Translation and Publications).14 Fereydoun Kamran (Citation1995) Rural Development and Planning, p. 20 (Tehran: Avay-e Nour Publications).15 Abdol Ali Lahsaeizadeh (Citation1998) Sociological Study of Rural Management in Iran, in: Papers’ Collection for the First Conference on Sociology and Management, p. 403 (Tehran: Industrial Management Organization).16 Foran, ibid, p. 339.17 Ibid, p. 193.18 Fatemeh E. Moghadam (Citation1996) From Land Reform to Revolution, the Politics of Agricultural Development in Iran, 1962–1979, p. 193 (London: Tanris).19 Preamble of the Constitution: The Constitution guarantees the negation of any form of intellectual and social oppression and economic monopoly and tries to break away from the dictatorial system so as to place the destiny of people in their own hands.- Article 44 divides the economy into three sections of government, cooperatives, and the private sector:-Article 7 related with the councils.-Article 100: With a view to expending the speedy implementation of social, economic, development, health, cultural and educational plans and other welfare affairs, the management of the affairs of each village, district, city, town or province shall be carried out with the cooperation of the people, and with due consideration to the local needs, under the supervision of a Council known as Village, District, City, Town or Provincial Council whose members shall be elected by the people of the same locality.-Article 102: The High Council of the Provinces shall be allowed, within the scope of its functions, to draw up bills and propose them to the National Parliament (5) either directly or through the Government.20 Institute for Social Studies and Research of University of Tehran (Citation1974) Socio- Economic Studies of Farm Corporation in Six Regions of Iran (Tehran: Institute for Social Studies and Research Publications).21 Mostafa Azkia (Citation2016) Sociology of Development and Under Development of Rural Iran, p. 435 (Tehran: Etla′at Publications).22 Ali Shakoori (Citation2019) Rural Development in Iran: A Survey of Policies and Outcomes, Journal of Developing Societies, 35 (3), p. 347.23 Abrahamian, “Iran Between Two Revolutions,” p. 29.24 Hesbat has a historical past and was an important institution for daily life order in Islamic cities. A text from the thirteenth century, Ayeen-i Hesbat [Municipal Regulations] lists the Mohtaseb’s duties: Responsibility for urban businesses supervision and inspection. He must prevent cheating and fraud in business and guide merchants to act according to Islamic orders (for more information see Ibn-e- Ekhvah (Citation1988) Municipal Regulations in the 7th Century (Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publications).25 Saadodin Rooshdiye (Citation1964) Urban Development and Urban Planning in Iran (Tehran: Iran Municipalities Association Press).26 Seyed Mohsen Habibi (Citation1997) From Old City to City: A Historical Analysis of the Concept of City (Tehran: University of Tehran Press).27 Mosstafa Keeyani (Citation2007) The First Pahlavi’s Architecture (Tehran: Institute for Contemporary Historical Studies).28 Bernard Hourcade (Citation2009) Tehran of Alborz [Persian translation by S. Sahami] (Mashhad: Mohaghegh and Tarane Publications).29 Institute for Social Studies and Research of University of Tehran (Citation1964) Lectures and Reports from the First Seminar on Tehran’ Social Problems (Tehran: Institute for Social Studies and Research Publications).30 Ahmad Ashraf & Ali Banuazizi (Citation2008) Social Classes, State and Revolution in Iran [Persian translation by S. Torabi Farsani] (Tehran: Niloofar Publications).31 Seyed Mohammad Hossein Mirabolghasemi (Citation2003) Taleghani, A Roar in Silence: A Short Research in Life and Thoughts of Ayatollah Taleghani (Tehran: Enteshar Publications).32 Hossein Imani Jajarmi & Mostafa Azkia (Citation2009) Challenges for Local Democracy in Iran: A Study of Islamic City Councils, Middle East Critique, 18(2), pp. 145–159.33 Azkia, “Sociology of Development,” p. 426.34 Ali Shakoori (Citation2006) People’s Participation in Post-revolution Rural Reforms in Iran, Journal of Rural Development, 25 (3), pp. 420–421.35 Shakoori, “People Participation,” p. 420.36 Simin Fadaeei (Citation2018) The Long Twentieth Century in Iran: Dynamics of Change, Continuity and Mobilizing Master Frames, Journal of Developing Societies, 34(2), pp. 1–21.37 Kaveh Ehsani (Citation2006) Rural Society and Agricultural Development in Post-Revolution Iran: The First Two Decades, Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 15(1), p. 78.38 For more detail, see Ahamd Ashraf (Citation1985) The State, Classes and Mode of Mobilization in the Iranian Revolution, State, Culture, and Society,1(3), pp. 277–311; Ehsani, “Rural Society,” pp. 79–96; Ali Asghar Saeidi (Citation2004) The Accountability of Para-Governmental Organization (Bonyads): The Case of Iranian Foundations, Iranian Studies,37(3), pp. 479–498; and Ali Farazmand (Citation1989) The State, Bureaucracy and Revolution in Modern Iran: Agrarian Reform and Regime Politics (New York: Praeger).\",\"PeriodicalId\":44822,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Critique\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Critique\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2023.2268881\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AREA STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Critique","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19436149.2023.2268881","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:1906年的宪法革命开启了伊朗的新时代。几十年来,为了制定法律,建立了一个国家议会,建立了城市、村庄委员会和市长等现代机构。城市治理得到更新,20世纪60年代的土地改革改造了农村治理,改变了地主-农民关系,削弱了村长在村庄管理中的传统权威。1979年的革命引入了一种新的地方治理方式——伊斯兰委员会来管理城市和村庄。本文运用依存性发展的理论概念,讨论了伊朗地方治理的主要变化和挑战。在1979年革命前后,通过创建几个农村和城市组织,讨论了权力的变化模式和国家官僚机构的渗透。文章还解释了这些农村和城市机构的建立如何有助于增加国家官员在城市和农村的统治。关键词:官僚主义中央集权主义发展治理伊朗披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1 Fernando Henrique Cardoso & Enzo Faletto(引文1979)拉丁美洲的依赖与发展(伯克利:加州大学出版社)约翰份(Citation1999)脆弱的阻力:在伊朗社会转变的历史,从沙法维王朝时代到伊斯兰革命之后(由A . Tadayon波斯语翻译)(德黑兰:拉莎文化服务研究所),p。288.3 Hossein Mahdavi (Citation1970)食利者州的经济发展模式和问题:伊朗的情况下,:硕士库克(主编),研究经济史的中东伊斯兰教的崛起至今,p。258(牛津大学:牛津大学出版社)4 . Mohsen Modir Shanehchi (citation):当代伊朗的中央集权与欠发达,第361页(德黑兰:RASA文化服务研究所)同上,第31.6页。Homa Katouzian(引文1993)《伊朗政治经济学》第2卷。[M. R. Nafisi和K. Azizi的波斯语翻译],第4-53页(德黑兰:Papirus出版社)8 . Ali Asghar Shamim (Citation1992)《Ghajarid时代的伊朗:13世纪到14世纪上半叶》,第223页(德黑兰:Elmi出版社)一个。9 . S. Malikof (citation) 1979:伊朗礼萨汗独裁政权的建立[S. Irani波斯语翻译],第66页(德黑兰:口袋图书公司)弗雷德·哈利迪(引文1979),伊朗,独裁和发展[M. Yalghani和A. Tolou的波斯语翻译],第24页(德黑兰:Elm出版社)Ervand Abrahamian (Citation1998)两次革命之间的伊朗[A. Golmohammadi和M. A. Fatahi的波斯语翻译],第541页(德黑兰:Nashr-e Ney Publications)Jahangir Amouzgar (Citation1996)《巴列维王朝的兴衰》[A. Lotfian波斯语翻译],第321页(德黑兰:图书翻译和出版中心)fereydown Kamran(引文1995)农村发展和规划,第20页(德黑兰:Avay-e Nour出版社)Abdol Ali Lahsaeizadeh (Citation1998),《伊朗农村管理的社会学研究》,载于:第一届社会学与管理会议论文集,第403页(德黑兰:工业管理组织)19 . Fatemeh E. Moghadam (Citation1996)《从土地改革到革命,伊朗农业发展的政治,1962-1979》,第193页(伦敦:Tanris)宪法序言:宪法保证否定任何形式的知识和社会压迫以及经济垄断,并试图摆脱独裁制度,将人民的命运掌握在自己手中。——第44条将经济划分为政府、合作社、民间等3个部门:——第7条与理事会有关。100年的文章:为了迅速执行社会、经济、发展、卫生、文化和教育计划及其他福利事务,每一村、区、市、镇或省的事务应在称为村、区、市、镇或省议会的监督下,在人民的合作下进行管理,并适当考虑到当地的需要,该委员会的成员应由同一地方的人民选举产生。-第102条:允许省最高委员会在其职能范围内直接或通过政府起草法案并向国民议会提出。20德黑兰大学社会研究和研究所(Citation1974)伊朗六个地区农业公司社会经济研究(德黑兰:社会研究和研究出版物研究所)。 21 Mostafa Azkia (citation):伊朗农村发展与欠发展的社会学,p. 435(德黑兰:Etla 'at Publications).22Ali Shakoori (Citation2019)伊朗农村发展:政策和结果调查,发展中社会杂志,35 (3),p. 347.23 Abrahamian,“两次革命之间的伊朗”,p. 29.24 Hesbat有一个历史过去,是伊斯兰城市日常生活秩序的重要机构。13世纪的一篇文章《Ayeen-i Hesbat(市政条例)》列出了Mohtaseb的职责:负责城市商业监督和检查。他必须防止商业上的欺骗和欺诈,并指导商人按照伊斯兰教的命令行事(更多信息见Ibn-e- Ekhvah (Citation1988) 7世纪的市政条例(德黑兰:Elmi va Farhangi Publications)Saadodin Rooshdiye(引文1964)伊朗的城市发展和城市规划(德黑兰:伊朗市政协会出版社).26赛义德·莫森·哈比比:《从旧城到城市:对城市概念的历史分析》(德黑兰:德黑兰大学出版社,1997).27Mosstafa Keeyani (Citation2007)第一个巴列维的建筑(德黑兰:当代历史研究所).28Bernard Hourcade (citation) 2009) Alborz的德黑兰[S. Sahami的波斯语翻译](Mashhad: mohaghgh and Tarane Publications).2930 .德黑兰大学社会研究和研究所(引文1964)第一届德黑兰社会问题研讨会的讲稿和报告(德黑兰:社会研究和研究出版物研究所)Ahmad Ashraf & Ali Banuazizi (Citation2008)伊朗的社会阶级、国家和革命[S. Torabi Farsani波斯语翻译](德黑兰:Niloofar出版社).31赛义德·穆罕默德·侯赛因·米拉博尔加塞米(引文2003):《寂静中的咆哮:阿亚图拉·塔莱哈尼生平与思想简史》(德黑兰:Enteshar出版社),第32页伊朗地方民主的挑战:伊斯兰城市议会的研究,中东批判,18(2),页145-159.33 Azkia,“发展社会学”,页426.34 Ali Shakoori (Citation2006),“伊朗革命后农村改革中的人民参与”,页420-421.35 Shakoori,“人民参与”,页420.36 Simin Fadaeei (Citation2018)。Kaveh Ehsani (Citation2006)革命后伊朗的农村社会和农业发展:前二十年,批判:关键的中东研究15(1),78.38页。欲了解更多细节,请参见ahmad Ashraf (Citation1985)伊朗革命中的国家、阶级和动员模式,国家、文化和社会,1(3),277-311页;Ehsani,“乡村社会”,第79-96页;Ali Asghar Saeidi (Citation2004):《para - government Organization的问责制(Bonyads):以伊朗基金会为例》,《伊朗研究》37(3),第479-498页;Ali Farazmand,《现代伊朗的国家、官僚和革命:土地改革和政权政治》(纽约:Praeger出版社,1989)。
Historical Overview of Development’s Impact on Rural and Urban Governance in Iran
Abstract:The constitutional revolution in 1906 was the beginning of a new era for Iran. A national parliament was established for making laws that established modern institutions such as city and village councils and mayors over the decades. Urban governance was renewed and the land reforms in the 1960s transformed rural governance, changed landlord– peasant relations and reduced the traditional authority of village headman (kadkhodas) in village administration. The 1979 revolution introduced a new kind of local governance, Islamic councils for governing cities and villages. This article discusses the main changes and challenges of local governance in Iran by using theoretical concepts of dependent development. The changing pattern of authority and penetration of state bureaucracy through the creation of several rural and urban organizations before and after the Revolution of 1979 is discussed. The article also explains how the establishments of these rural and urban institutions have helped to increase the domination of the state officials within both cities and villages.Key Words: BureaucracycentralismdevelopmentgovernanceIran Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 Fernando Henrique Cardoso & Enzo Faletto (Citation1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America (Berkeley: University of California Press).2 John Foran (Citation1999) Fragile Resistance: A History of Social Transformations in Iran, From the Safavid Era to the Years Following the Islamic Revolution [Persian translation by A. Tadayon] (Tehran: RASA Institute for Cultural Services), p. 288.3 Hossein Mahdavi (Citation1970) The Pattern and Problems of Economic Development in Rentier States: The Case of Iran, in: M.A. Cook (ed.), Studies in Economic History of the Middle East from the Rise of Islam to the Present Day, p. 258 (Oxford: Oxford University Press).4 Mohsen Modir Shanehchi (Citation2000) Centralism and Underdevelopment in Contemporary Iran, p. 361 (Tehran : RASA Institute for Cultural Services).5 Ibid, p. 31.6 Homa Katouzian (Citation1993 (Political Economy of Iran, vol. 2. [Persian translation by M. R. Nafisi and K. Azizi], pp. 4–53 (Tehran: Papirus Publications).7 Ali Asghar Shamim (Citation1992) Iran in Ghajarid Era: 13th Century to the First Half of the 14th Lunar Century, p. 223 (Tehran: Elmi Publications).8 A. S. Malikof (Citation1979) The Establishment of Reza Khan Dictatorship in Iran [Persian translation by S. Irani], p. 66 (Tehran: the Pocket books Company).9 Fred Halliday (Citation1979) Iran, Dictatorship and Development [Persian translation by M. Yalghani and A. Tolou], p. 24 (Tehran: Elm Publications).10 Foran, op. cit., p. 339.11 Ervand Abrahamian (Citation1998) Iran Between Two Revolutions [Persian translation by A. Golmohammadi and M. A. Fatahi], p. 541 (Tehran: Nashr-e Ney Publications).12 Katouzian, “Political Economy,” p. 225.13 Jahangir Amouzgar (Citation1996) The Rise and Fall of Pahlavi Dynasty [Persian translation by A. Lotfian], p. 321 (Tehran: The Center of Book Translation and Publications).14 Fereydoun Kamran (Citation1995) Rural Development and Planning, p. 20 (Tehran: Avay-e Nour Publications).15 Abdol Ali Lahsaeizadeh (Citation1998) Sociological Study of Rural Management in Iran, in: Papers’ Collection for the First Conference on Sociology and Management, p. 403 (Tehran: Industrial Management Organization).16 Foran, ibid, p. 339.17 Ibid, p. 193.18 Fatemeh E. Moghadam (Citation1996) From Land Reform to Revolution, the Politics of Agricultural Development in Iran, 1962–1979, p. 193 (London: Tanris).19 Preamble of the Constitution: The Constitution guarantees the negation of any form of intellectual and social oppression and economic monopoly and tries to break away from the dictatorial system so as to place the destiny of people in their own hands.- Article 44 divides the economy into three sections of government, cooperatives, and the private sector:-Article 7 related with the councils.-Article 100: With a view to expending the speedy implementation of social, economic, development, health, cultural and educational plans and other welfare affairs, the management of the affairs of each village, district, city, town or province shall be carried out with the cooperation of the people, and with due consideration to the local needs, under the supervision of a Council known as Village, District, City, Town or Provincial Council whose members shall be elected by the people of the same locality.-Article 102: The High Council of the Provinces shall be allowed, within the scope of its functions, to draw up bills and propose them to the National Parliament (5) either directly or through the Government.20 Institute for Social Studies and Research of University of Tehran (Citation1974) Socio- Economic Studies of Farm Corporation in Six Regions of Iran (Tehran: Institute for Social Studies and Research Publications).21 Mostafa Azkia (Citation2016) Sociology of Development and Under Development of Rural Iran, p. 435 (Tehran: Etla′at Publications).22 Ali Shakoori (Citation2019) Rural Development in Iran: A Survey of Policies and Outcomes, Journal of Developing Societies, 35 (3), p. 347.23 Abrahamian, “Iran Between Two Revolutions,” p. 29.24 Hesbat has a historical past and was an important institution for daily life order in Islamic cities. A text from the thirteenth century, Ayeen-i Hesbat [Municipal Regulations] lists the Mohtaseb’s duties: Responsibility for urban businesses supervision and inspection. He must prevent cheating and fraud in business and guide merchants to act according to Islamic orders (for more information see Ibn-e- Ekhvah (Citation1988) Municipal Regulations in the 7th Century (Tehran: Elmi va Farhangi Publications).25 Saadodin Rooshdiye (Citation1964) Urban Development and Urban Planning in Iran (Tehran: Iran Municipalities Association Press).26 Seyed Mohsen Habibi (Citation1997) From Old City to City: A Historical Analysis of the Concept of City (Tehran: University of Tehran Press).27 Mosstafa Keeyani (Citation2007) The First Pahlavi’s Architecture (Tehran: Institute for Contemporary Historical Studies).28 Bernard Hourcade (Citation2009) Tehran of Alborz [Persian translation by S. Sahami] (Mashhad: Mohaghegh and Tarane Publications).29 Institute for Social Studies and Research of University of Tehran (Citation1964) Lectures and Reports from the First Seminar on Tehran’ Social Problems (Tehran: Institute for Social Studies and Research Publications).30 Ahmad Ashraf & Ali Banuazizi (Citation2008) Social Classes, State and Revolution in Iran [Persian translation by S. Torabi Farsani] (Tehran: Niloofar Publications).31 Seyed Mohammad Hossein Mirabolghasemi (Citation2003) Taleghani, A Roar in Silence: A Short Research in Life and Thoughts of Ayatollah Taleghani (Tehran: Enteshar Publications).32 Hossein Imani Jajarmi & Mostafa Azkia (Citation2009) Challenges for Local Democracy in Iran: A Study of Islamic City Councils, Middle East Critique, 18(2), pp. 145–159.33 Azkia, “Sociology of Development,” p. 426.34 Ali Shakoori (Citation2006) People’s Participation in Post-revolution Rural Reforms in Iran, Journal of Rural Development, 25 (3), pp. 420–421.35 Shakoori, “People Participation,” p. 420.36 Simin Fadaeei (Citation2018) The Long Twentieth Century in Iran: Dynamics of Change, Continuity and Mobilizing Master Frames, Journal of Developing Societies, 34(2), pp. 1–21.37 Kaveh Ehsani (Citation2006) Rural Society and Agricultural Development in Post-Revolution Iran: The First Two Decades, Critique: Critical Middle Eastern Studies 15(1), p. 78.38 For more detail, see Ahamd Ashraf (Citation1985) The State, Classes and Mode of Mobilization in the Iranian Revolution, State, Culture, and Society,1(3), pp. 277–311; Ehsani, “Rural Society,” pp. 79–96; Ali Asghar Saeidi (Citation2004) The Accountability of Para-Governmental Organization (Bonyads): The Case of Iranian Foundations, Iranian Studies,37(3), pp. 479–498; and Ali Farazmand (Citation1989) The State, Bureaucracy and Revolution in Modern Iran: Agrarian Reform and Regime Politics (New York: Praeger).