运用认知情绪支持加拿大职前教师学习课堂评估

Lia M. Daniels, Kendra Wells
{"title":"运用认知情绪支持加拿大职前教师学习课堂评估","authors":"Lia M. Daniels, Kendra Wells","doi":"10.1080/08878730.2023.2270278","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractStudents feel epistemic emotions like surprise or frustration when they encounter content that conflicts with their beliefs or previous knowledge in a way that can facilitate or hinder learning. Pre-service teachers may find that professional perspectives on assessment conflict with their previous knowledge of assessment, creating epistemic emotions. The purpose of this research was to evaluate how frustration, curiosity, and surprise felt during two learning experiences related to self-reported learning of assessment and application to practice. N = 205 pre-service teachers consented for their responses to questions associated with two learning activities to be analyzed. Participants reported experiencing moderate levels of curiosity in both activities, but one garnered more frustration and the other more surprise. Frustration was negatively associated with self-reported learning and application. Whereas, curiosity and surprise had statistically significant positive associations with the outcomes. We discuss the role of epistemic emotions in learning about assessment and offer recommendations for instructors. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada Insight Grant #435-2022-1075 to the first author.","PeriodicalId":349931,"journal":{"name":"The Teacher Educator","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Epistemic Emotions to Support Canadian Pre-Service Teachers Learning about Classroom Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Lia M. Daniels, Kendra Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08878730.2023.2270278\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractStudents feel epistemic emotions like surprise or frustration when they encounter content that conflicts with their beliefs or previous knowledge in a way that can facilitate or hinder learning. Pre-service teachers may find that professional perspectives on assessment conflict with their previous knowledge of assessment, creating epistemic emotions. The purpose of this research was to evaluate how frustration, curiosity, and surprise felt during two learning experiences related to self-reported learning of assessment and application to practice. N = 205 pre-service teachers consented for their responses to questions associated with two learning activities to be analyzed. Participants reported experiencing moderate levels of curiosity in both activities, but one garnered more frustration and the other more surprise. Frustration was negatively associated with self-reported learning and application. Whereas, curiosity and surprise had statistically significant positive associations with the outcomes. We discuss the role of epistemic emotions in learning about assessment and offer recommendations for instructors. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada Insight Grant #435-2022-1075 to the first author.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349931,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Teacher Educator\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Teacher Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2023.2270278\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Teacher Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2023.2270278","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要当学生遇到与他们的信念或以前的知识相冲突的内容时,他们会感到惊讶或沮丧,从而促进或阻碍他们的学习。职前教师可能会发现评估的专业观点与他们之前对评估的认识相冲突,从而产生认知情绪。本研究的目的是评估在两种与自我报告学习评估和应用于实践相关的学习经历中,挫折、好奇和惊讶的感受。N = 205名职前教师同意对两项学习活动相关问题的回答进行分析。参与者报告说,在这两种活动中都有适度的好奇心,但其中一种活动更令人沮丧,另一种活动更令人惊讶。挫折与自我报告的学习和应用呈负相关。然而,好奇和惊讶与结果有统计学上显著的正相关。我们讨论了认知情绪在学习评估中的作用,并为教师提供了建议。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由加拿大社会科学与人文理事会Insight Grant #435-2022-1075资助给第一作者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using Epistemic Emotions to Support Canadian Pre-Service Teachers Learning about Classroom Assessment
AbstractStudents feel epistemic emotions like surprise or frustration when they encounter content that conflicts with their beliefs or previous knowledge in a way that can facilitate or hinder learning. Pre-service teachers may find that professional perspectives on assessment conflict with their previous knowledge of assessment, creating epistemic emotions. The purpose of this research was to evaluate how frustration, curiosity, and surprise felt during two learning experiences related to self-reported learning of assessment and application to practice. N = 205 pre-service teachers consented for their responses to questions associated with two learning activities to be analyzed. Participants reported experiencing moderate levels of curiosity in both activities, but one garnered more frustration and the other more surprise. Frustration was negatively associated with self-reported learning and application. Whereas, curiosity and surprise had statistically significant positive associations with the outcomes. We discuss the role of epistemic emotions in learning about assessment and offer recommendations for instructors. Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by a Social Sciences and Humanities Council of Canada Insight Grant #435-2022-1075 to the first author.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信