{"title":"考虑最高法院关于招生平权行动的决定的影响","authors":"Eric Lyerly","doi":"10.1002/tsr.31173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a decision that reverberated throughout the halls of higher education, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down race‐conscious admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina ( See Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, Slip Op. No. 20‐1199 (2023) ). The decision overturns decades of precedent and effectively invalidates affirmative action policies in college admissions.","PeriodicalId":202136,"journal":{"name":"The Successful Registrar","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consider implications of Supreme Court decision regarding affirmative action in admissions\",\"authors\":\"Eric Lyerly\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/tsr.31173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In a decision that reverberated throughout the halls of higher education, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down race‐conscious admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina ( See Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, Slip Op. No. 20‐1199 (2023) ). The decision overturns decades of precedent and effectively invalidates affirmative action policies in college admissions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202136,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Successful Registrar\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Successful Registrar\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsr.31173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Successful Registrar","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tsr.31173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consider implications of Supreme Court decision regarding affirmative action in admissions
In a decision that reverberated throughout the halls of higher education, the U.S. Supreme Court struck down race‐conscious admissions programs at Harvard University and the University of North Carolina ( See Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, Slip Op. No. 20‐1199 (2023) ). The decision overturns decades of precedent and effectively invalidates affirmative action policies in college admissions.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
