基于贝叶斯优化算法的超音速流中 SST 湍流模型参数的不确定性量化与识别

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Maotao Yang, Mingming Guo, Yi Zhang, Ye Tian, Miaorong Yi, Jialing Le, Hua Zhang
{"title":"基于贝叶斯优化算法的超音速流中 SST 湍流模型参数的不确定性量化与识别","authors":"Maotao Yang,&nbsp;Mingming Guo,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Ye Tian,&nbsp;Miaorong Yi,&nbsp;Jialing Le,&nbsp;Hua Zhang","doi":"10.1002/fld.5245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model is the main model in engineering applications today. However, the normal value of the closure coefficient of the RANS turbulence model is determined based on some simple basic flows and may no longer be applicable for complex flows. In this paper, the closure coefficient of shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model is recalibrated by combining Bayesian method and particle swarm optimization algorithm, so as to improve the numerical simulation accuracy of wall pressure in supersonic flow. First, the obtained prior samples were numerically calculated, and the Sobol index of the closure coefficient was calculated by sensitivity analysis method to characterize the sensitivity of the wall pressure to the model parameters. Second, combined with the uncertainty of propagation parameters by non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC). Finally, Bayesian optimization is used to quantify the uncertainty and obtain the maximum likelihood function estimation and optimal parameters. The results show that the maximum relative error of wall pressure predicted by the SST turbulence model decreases from 29.71% to 9.00%, and the average relative error decreases from 9.86% to 3.67% through the parameter calibration of Bayesian optimization method. In addition, the system evaluated the calibration effect of three criteria, and the calibration results parameters under the three criteria were all better than the calculated results of the nominal values. Meanwhile, the velocity profile and density profile of the flow field were also analyzed. Finally, the same calibration method was applied to the supersonic hollow cylinder and BSL (Baseline) turbulence model, and the same calibration results were obtained, which verified the universality of the calibration method.</p>","PeriodicalId":50348,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Uncertainty quantification and identification of SST turbulence model parameters based on Bayesian optimization algorithm in supersonic flow\",\"authors\":\"Maotao Yang,&nbsp;Mingming Guo,&nbsp;Yi Zhang,&nbsp;Ye Tian,&nbsp;Miaorong Yi,&nbsp;Jialing Le,&nbsp;Hua Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/fld.5245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model is the main model in engineering applications today. However, the normal value of the closure coefficient of the RANS turbulence model is determined based on some simple basic flows and may no longer be applicable for complex flows. In this paper, the closure coefficient of shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model is recalibrated by combining Bayesian method and particle swarm optimization algorithm, so as to improve the numerical simulation accuracy of wall pressure in supersonic flow. First, the obtained prior samples were numerically calculated, and the Sobol index of the closure coefficient was calculated by sensitivity analysis method to characterize the sensitivity of the wall pressure to the model parameters. Second, combined with the uncertainty of propagation parameters by non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC). Finally, Bayesian optimization is used to quantify the uncertainty and obtain the maximum likelihood function estimation and optimal parameters. The results show that the maximum relative error of wall pressure predicted by the SST turbulence model decreases from 29.71% to 9.00%, and the average relative error decreases from 9.86% to 3.67% through the parameter calibration of Bayesian optimization method. In addition, the system evaluated the calibration effect of three criteria, and the calibration results parameters under the three criteria were all better than the calculated results of the nominal values. Meanwhile, the velocity profile and density profile of the flow field were also analyzed. Finally, the same calibration method was applied to the supersonic hollow cylinder and BSL (Baseline) turbulence model, and the same calibration results were obtained, which verified the universality of the calibration method.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50348,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5245\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fld.5245","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

雷诺平均纳维-斯托克斯(RANS)模型是当今工程应用中的主要模型。然而,RANS 湍流模型闭合系数的正常值是根据一些简单的基本流动确定的,可能不再适用于复杂流动。本文结合贝叶斯方法和粒子群优化算法,对剪应力输运(SST)湍流模型的闭合系数进行了重新标定,以提高超音速流动壁面压力的数值模拟精度。首先,对得到的先验样本进行数值计算,通过敏感性分析方法计算闭合系数的 Sobol 指数,表征壁面压力对模型参数的敏感性。其次,通过非侵入式多项式混沌(NIPC)结合传播参数的不确定性。最后,采用贝叶斯优化法对不确定性进行量化,得到最大似然函数估计值和最优参数。结果表明,通过贝叶斯优化法的参数校准,SST 湍流模型预测的壁压最大相对误差从 29.71% 减小到 9.00%,平均相对误差从 9.86% 减小到 3.67%。此外,系统还评估了三个准则的标定效果,三个准则下的标定结果参数均优于标称值的计算结果。同时,还分析了流场的速度剖面和密度剖面。最后,将相同的标定方法应用于超音速空心圆柱体和 BSL(基线)湍流模型,得到了相同的标定结果,验证了该标定方法的通用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Uncertainty quantification and identification of SST turbulence model parameters based on Bayesian optimization algorithm in supersonic flow

Uncertainty quantification and identification of SST turbulence model parameters based on Bayesian optimization algorithm in supersonic flow

Uncertainty quantification and identification of SST turbulence model parameters based on Bayesian optimization algorithm in supersonic flow

The Reynolds-Averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) model is the main model in engineering applications today. However, the normal value of the closure coefficient of the RANS turbulence model is determined based on some simple basic flows and may no longer be applicable for complex flows. In this paper, the closure coefficient of shear stress transport (SST) turbulence model is recalibrated by combining Bayesian method and particle swarm optimization algorithm, so as to improve the numerical simulation accuracy of wall pressure in supersonic flow. First, the obtained prior samples were numerically calculated, and the Sobol index of the closure coefficient was calculated by sensitivity analysis method to characterize the sensitivity of the wall pressure to the model parameters. Second, combined with the uncertainty of propagation parameters by non-intrusive polynomial chaos (NIPC). Finally, Bayesian optimization is used to quantify the uncertainty and obtain the maximum likelihood function estimation and optimal parameters. The results show that the maximum relative error of wall pressure predicted by the SST turbulence model decreases from 29.71% to 9.00%, and the average relative error decreases from 9.86% to 3.67% through the parameter calibration of Bayesian optimization method. In addition, the system evaluated the calibration effect of three criteria, and the calibration results parameters under the three criteria were all better than the calculated results of the nominal values. Meanwhile, the velocity profile and density profile of the flow field were also analyzed. Finally, the same calibration method was applied to the supersonic hollow cylinder and BSL (Baseline) turbulence model, and the same calibration results were obtained, which verified the universality of the calibration method.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids
International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
111
审稿时长
8 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids publishes refereed papers describing significant developments in computational methods that are applicable to scientific and engineering problems in fluid mechanics, fluid dynamics, micro and bio fluidics, and fluid-structure interaction. Numerical methods for solving ancillary equations, such as transport and advection and diffusion, are also relevant. The Editors encourage contributions in the areas of multi-physics, multi-disciplinary and multi-scale problems involving fluid subsystems, verification and validation, uncertainty quantification, and model reduction. Numerical examples that illustrate the described methods or their accuracy are in general expected. Discussions of papers already in print are also considered. However, papers dealing strictly with applications of existing methods or dealing with areas of research that are not deemed to be cutting edge by the Editors will not be considered for review. The journal publishes full-length papers, which should normally be less than 25 journal pages in length. Two-part papers are discouraged unless considered necessary by the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信