{"title":"评论:在新加坡接受骨盆环骨折手术后重返工作岗位","authors":"Anne HY Goei, Alvin KW Tan, David Koh","doi":"10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2023-226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Sir, We read with interest the article ‘Return to work after surgically treated pelvic ring fractures in Singapore’ by Ng et al.[1] The authors have commendably explored perioperative factors affecting return to work (RTW) and underscored the importance of early rehabilitation and work reintegration. However, only one job-related factor — a dichotomous classification of job sedentariness — was analysed. Given the heterogeneity of work, we propose several suggestions to generate meaningful insights on RTW evaluations. First, RTW involves a comprehensive evaluation of patents’ functional capabilities relating to the nature and demands of their current work. This can only be achieved through a detailed occupational history. Often forgotten,[2,3] an occupational history allows the clinician to ascertain what the patient actually does at work (e.g., the need to lift loads, use of machinery, working hours, presence of shift work) to better quantify the risk of reinjury, delayed recovery and to what extent the patient can function at work. Second, the ability to RTW is multifactorial, comprising psychosocial and workplace factors like self-efficacy, workplace support, work satisfaction, RTW coordination programmes and availability of job accommodations.[4] These were not evaluated or adjusted for, and may be potential confounders affecting the ability to detect significant associations. Return to work is a multidisciplinary and multisectoral collaboration, and involvement of the employer is critical. Ideally, patients should not be on medical leave till complete recovery. Instead, early reintegration using stepwise assimilation, with appropriate job restrictions and accommodations provided by the employer are crucial in early RTW and creating a healthier workforce.[5] Editor’s note: The authors, Ng et al., did not respond to the above letter. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.","PeriodicalId":21752,"journal":{"name":"Singapore medical journal","volume":"29 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comments on: Return to work after surgically treated pelvic ring fractures in Singapore\",\"authors\":\"Anne HY Goei, Alvin KW Tan, David Koh\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2023-226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dear Sir, We read with interest the article ‘Return to work after surgically treated pelvic ring fractures in Singapore’ by Ng et al.[1] The authors have commendably explored perioperative factors affecting return to work (RTW) and underscored the importance of early rehabilitation and work reintegration. However, only one job-related factor — a dichotomous classification of job sedentariness — was analysed. Given the heterogeneity of work, we propose several suggestions to generate meaningful insights on RTW evaluations. First, RTW involves a comprehensive evaluation of patents’ functional capabilities relating to the nature and demands of their current work. This can only be achieved through a detailed occupational history. Often forgotten,[2,3] an occupational history allows the clinician to ascertain what the patient actually does at work (e.g., the need to lift loads, use of machinery, working hours, presence of shift work) to better quantify the risk of reinjury, delayed recovery and to what extent the patient can function at work. Second, the ability to RTW is multifactorial, comprising psychosocial and workplace factors like self-efficacy, workplace support, work satisfaction, RTW coordination programmes and availability of job accommodations.[4] These were not evaluated or adjusted for, and may be potential confounders affecting the ability to detect significant associations. Return to work is a multidisciplinary and multisectoral collaboration, and involvement of the employer is critical. Ideally, patients should not be on medical leave till complete recovery. Instead, early reintegration using stepwise assimilation, with appropriate job restrictions and accommodations provided by the employer are crucial in early RTW and creating a healthier workforce.[5] Editor’s note: The authors, Ng et al., did not respond to the above letter. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"volume\":\"29 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Singapore medical journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2023-226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Singapore medical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/singaporemedj.smj-2023-226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comments on: Return to work after surgically treated pelvic ring fractures in Singapore
Dear Sir, We read with interest the article ‘Return to work after surgically treated pelvic ring fractures in Singapore’ by Ng et al.[1] The authors have commendably explored perioperative factors affecting return to work (RTW) and underscored the importance of early rehabilitation and work reintegration. However, only one job-related factor — a dichotomous classification of job sedentariness — was analysed. Given the heterogeneity of work, we propose several suggestions to generate meaningful insights on RTW evaluations. First, RTW involves a comprehensive evaluation of patents’ functional capabilities relating to the nature and demands of their current work. This can only be achieved through a detailed occupational history. Often forgotten,[2,3] an occupational history allows the clinician to ascertain what the patient actually does at work (e.g., the need to lift loads, use of machinery, working hours, presence of shift work) to better quantify the risk of reinjury, delayed recovery and to what extent the patient can function at work. Second, the ability to RTW is multifactorial, comprising psychosocial and workplace factors like self-efficacy, workplace support, work satisfaction, RTW coordination programmes and availability of job accommodations.[4] These were not evaluated or adjusted for, and may be potential confounders affecting the ability to detect significant associations. Return to work is a multidisciplinary and multisectoral collaboration, and involvement of the employer is critical. Ideally, patients should not be on medical leave till complete recovery. Instead, early reintegration using stepwise assimilation, with appropriate job restrictions and accommodations provided by the employer are crucial in early RTW and creating a healthier workforce.[5] Editor’s note: The authors, Ng et al., did not respond to the above letter. Financial support and sponsorship Nil. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest.
期刊介绍:
The Singapore Medical Journal (SMJ) is the monthly publication of Singapore Medical Association (SMA). The Journal aims to advance medical practice and clinical research by publishing high-quality articles that add to the clinical knowledge of physicians in Singapore and worldwide.
SMJ is a general medical journal that focuses on all aspects of human health. The Journal publishes commissioned reviews, commentaries and editorials, original research, a small number of outstanding case reports, continuing medical education articles (ECG Series, Clinics in Diagnostic Imaging, Pictorial Essays, Practice Integration & Life-long Learning [PILL] Series), and short communications in the form of letters to the editor.