从社会比较理论看同事相对资历过高对员工反应的影响

Yanghao Zhu, Yunpeng Xu, Yannan Zhang
{"title":"从社会比较理论看同事相对资历过高对员工反应的影响","authors":"Yanghao Zhu, Yunpeng Xu, Yannan Zhang","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.18250abstract","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Perceived relative overqualification (PRQ) is a big step forward on the overqualification theme. The only two papers available on PRQ focus on downward comparison (Jahantab et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022), yet this may only consider one side of the coin. Drawing on social comparison theory and upward comparison perspective, this paper examines perceived coworker relative overqualification on their subsequent knowledge behavior and to examine the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. Through the 315 employee-coworker dyadic data collected at the three time points in East China, we found that when the cooperative goal interdependence between employee and coworker is high, the perception of coworker’s relative overqualification will cause benign envy of employees, which in turn promote employees to engage in knowledge seeking from coworker. However, when the competitive goal interdependence between employee and coworker is high, the perception of coworker’s relative overqualification will cause malicious envy of employees, which in turn promote employees to engage in knowledge sabotage towards coworker. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":471028,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Academy of Management","volume":"86 2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Coworker Relative Overqualification on Employee Reaction from Social Comparison Theory\",\"authors\":\"Yanghao Zhu, Yunpeng Xu, Yannan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.5465/amproc.2023.18250abstract\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Perceived relative overqualification (PRQ) is a big step forward on the overqualification theme. The only two papers available on PRQ focus on downward comparison (Jahantab et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022), yet this may only consider one side of the coin. Drawing on social comparison theory and upward comparison perspective, this paper examines perceived coworker relative overqualification on their subsequent knowledge behavior and to examine the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. Through the 315 employee-coworker dyadic data collected at the three time points in East China, we found that when the cooperative goal interdependence between employee and coworker is high, the perception of coworker’s relative overqualification will cause benign envy of employees, which in turn promote employees to engage in knowledge seeking from coworker. However, when the competitive goal interdependence between employee and coworker is high, the perception of coworker’s relative overqualification will cause malicious envy of employees, which in turn promote employees to engage in knowledge sabotage towards coworker. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":471028,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings - Academy of Management\",\"volume\":\"86 2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings - Academy of Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2023.18250abstract\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Academy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2023.18250abstract","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

感知相对资历过高(PRQ)是资历过高主题的一大进步。目前仅有的两篇关于PRQ的论文侧重于向下比较(Jahantab et al., 2021;Li et al., 2022),但这可能只考虑硬币的一面。本文利用社会比较理论和向上比较的视角,考察了感知到的同事相对资历过高对其后续知识行为的影响,并探讨了潜在的机制和边界条件。通过在华东地区三个时间点采集的315份员工-同事二元数据,我们发现当员工与同事之间的合作目标相互依赖程度较高时,员工对同事相对资质过高的感知会引起员工的良性嫉妒,进而促进员工向同事寻求知识。然而,当员工与同事之间的竞争目标相互依赖程度较高时,对同事相对资历过高的认知会引起员工的恶意嫉妒,进而促使员工对同事进行知识破坏。讨论了研究结果的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Effect of Coworker Relative Overqualification on Employee Reaction from Social Comparison Theory
Perceived relative overqualification (PRQ) is a big step forward on the overqualification theme. The only two papers available on PRQ focus on downward comparison (Jahantab et al., 2021; Li et al., 2022), yet this may only consider one side of the coin. Drawing on social comparison theory and upward comparison perspective, this paper examines perceived coworker relative overqualification on their subsequent knowledge behavior and to examine the underlying mechanisms and boundary conditions. Through the 315 employee-coworker dyadic data collected at the three time points in East China, we found that when the cooperative goal interdependence between employee and coworker is high, the perception of coworker’s relative overqualification will cause benign envy of employees, which in turn promote employees to engage in knowledge seeking from coworker. However, when the competitive goal interdependence between employee and coworker is high, the perception of coworker’s relative overqualification will cause malicious envy of employees, which in turn promote employees to engage in knowledge sabotage towards coworker. The theoretical and practical implications of the findings are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信