远程教育条件下高等教育学生知识评价的特点(以历史学科为例)

O. Honcharova
{"title":"远程教育条件下高等教育学生知识评价的特点(以历史学科为例)","authors":"O. Honcharova","doi":"10.30837/nc.2023.3.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is devoted to the analysis of the main forms of assessment of knowledge and skills acquired by higher education students in the study of historical disciplines in the context of distance learning, which can provide a quick correction of the educational process towards its improvement. Attention is drawn to the fact that assessment should be considered not only as a means of recording the results of students' learning activities, but also as a critical analysis of the educational process in order to improve it. It is shown that it is important to introduce an assessment system that would provide an adequate assessment of the student's work, knowledge and skills acquired during the course of study and provide the teacher with timely information to adjust the educational process. The author concludes that the transition to distance learning has given rise to a rethinking of the forms and methods of teaching, motivation of students' cognitive activity, and verification of their achievement of the expected learning outcomes. In order to make the most of the online environment, teachers need, on the one hand, to neutralize the main problems of this format, and on the other hand, to use the result to adjust, improve and update the educational process. To achieve this, control should be systematic, provided with theoretical support for students' learning activities in terms of mastering knowledge and skills and constant feedback between the teacher and the student. If we expect higher education students to become creative people who think critically and solve real problems, then all forms of control should be aimed at developing and assessing these skills. This will not only increase confidence in the higher education system, but will also have a positive impact on the quality of the educational process and the professional development of students.","PeriodicalId":496618,"journal":{"name":"Novìj kolegìum","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Peculiarities of Assessment of Knowledge of Higher Education Students in the Conditions of Distance Learning (on the Example of Historical Disciplines)\",\"authors\":\"O. Honcharova\",\"doi\":\"10.30837/nc.2023.3.101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is devoted to the analysis of the main forms of assessment of knowledge and skills acquired by higher education students in the study of historical disciplines in the context of distance learning, which can provide a quick correction of the educational process towards its improvement. Attention is drawn to the fact that assessment should be considered not only as a means of recording the results of students' learning activities, but also as a critical analysis of the educational process in order to improve it. It is shown that it is important to introduce an assessment system that would provide an adequate assessment of the student's work, knowledge and skills acquired during the course of study and provide the teacher with timely information to adjust the educational process. The author concludes that the transition to distance learning has given rise to a rethinking of the forms and methods of teaching, motivation of students' cognitive activity, and verification of their achievement of the expected learning outcomes. In order to make the most of the online environment, teachers need, on the one hand, to neutralize the main problems of this format, and on the other hand, to use the result to adjust, improve and update the educational process. To achieve this, control should be systematic, provided with theoretical support for students' learning activities in terms of mastering knowledge and skills and constant feedback between the teacher and the student. If we expect higher education students to become creative people who think critically and solve real problems, then all forms of control should be aimed at developing and assessing these skills. This will not only increase confidence in the higher education system, but will also have a positive impact on the quality of the educational process and the professional development of students.\",\"PeriodicalId\":496618,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Novìj kolegìum\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Novìj kolegìum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30837/nc.2023.3.101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Novìj kolegìum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30837/nc.2023.3.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析远程教育背景下高等教育学生在历史学科学习中获得的知识和技能评估的主要形式,从而为教育过程的改进提供快速的纠正。值得注意的是,评估不仅应被视为记录学生学习活动结果的一种手段,而且应被视为对教育过程的批判性分析,以改进教育过程。研究表明,引入一种评估系统,对学生在学习过程中获得的工作、知识和技能进行充分的评估,并为教师提供及时的信息来调整教育过程是很重要的。作者的结论是,向远程学习的过渡引起了对教学形式和方法的重新思考,对学生认知活动的动机的重新思考,以及对他们达到预期学习成果的验证。为了最大限度地利用网络环境,教师一方面需要消除这种形式的主要问题,另一方面需要利用结果来调整、改进和更新教育过程。要做到这一点,控制应该是系统化的,为学生掌握知识和技能的学习活动提供理论支持,并在师生之间不断反馈。如果我们期望高等教育的学生成为具有创造性的人,能够批判性地思考并解决实际问题,那么所有形式的控制都应该以发展和评估这些技能为目标。这不仅会增加对高等教育系统的信心,而且会对教育过程的质量和学生的专业发展产生积极的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Peculiarities of Assessment of Knowledge of Higher Education Students in the Conditions of Distance Learning (on the Example of Historical Disciplines)
The article is devoted to the analysis of the main forms of assessment of knowledge and skills acquired by higher education students in the study of historical disciplines in the context of distance learning, which can provide a quick correction of the educational process towards its improvement. Attention is drawn to the fact that assessment should be considered not only as a means of recording the results of students' learning activities, but also as a critical analysis of the educational process in order to improve it. It is shown that it is important to introduce an assessment system that would provide an adequate assessment of the student's work, knowledge and skills acquired during the course of study and provide the teacher with timely information to adjust the educational process. The author concludes that the transition to distance learning has given rise to a rethinking of the forms and methods of teaching, motivation of students' cognitive activity, and verification of their achievement of the expected learning outcomes. In order to make the most of the online environment, teachers need, on the one hand, to neutralize the main problems of this format, and on the other hand, to use the result to adjust, improve and update the educational process. To achieve this, control should be systematic, provided with theoretical support for students' learning activities in terms of mastering knowledge and skills and constant feedback between the teacher and the student. If we expect higher education students to become creative people who think critically and solve real problems, then all forms of control should be aimed at developing and assessing these skills. This will not only increase confidence in the higher education system, but will also have a positive impact on the quality of the educational process and the professional development of students.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信