批判性法律研究、人工智能和系统性种族主义:与吉姆·克劳文本挖掘教学

Q4 Social Sciences

Legal Reference Services Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1080/0270319x.2023.2264687

Ellie Campbell

{"title":"批判性法律研究、人工智能和系统性种族主义:与吉姆·克劳文本挖掘教学","authors":"Ellie Campbell","doi":"10.1080/0270319x.2023.2264687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractOn the Books: Jim Crow and Algorithms of Existence is a text-mining project undertaken by University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill libraries to identify racially based laws passed in the state between 1865 and 1967. In the fall 2022, I used the On the Books project to teach a module in my Advanced Legal Research class on critical legal research and artificial intelligence and legal analytics. This article examines the benefits of those modules for teaching critical thinking about legal research structures and legacies of racism in the American legal system.Keywords: DEIcritical legal researchAIalgorithmspedagogyJim Crowracial discrimination Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Libraries, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/.2 Pauli Murray, States’ Laws on Race and Color (1951).3 William Sturkey, The Laws in Context, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/laws/the-laws-in-context/.4 UNC BLSA, BLSA’s Expectations of Administration & Faculty at UNC Law, Daily Tar Heel (June 28, 2020, 8:23 P.M. EDT), www.dailytarheel.com/gallery/blsa-gallery.5 For context, my ALR course is a 3-credit, full semester, experiential graded course. I cover secondary sources and primary law in the first two-thirds of the semester, and then shift to special topics in the last third. I taught the OTB modules on CLR and AI in the special topics section in early November 2022.6 Nicholas Mignanelli, Critical Legal Research: Who Needs It, 112 Law Lib. J. 327 (2020).7 Nicholas Mignanelli, Legal Research and Its Discontents: A Bibliographic Essay on Critical Approaches to Legal Research, 113 Law Lib. J. 101, 102 (2021); Nicholas F. Stump, Following New Lights: Critical Legal Research Strategies as a Spark for Law Reform in Appalachia, 23 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 573 (2014–2015).8 Id. generally.9 Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, Why Do We Tell the Same Stories: Law Reform, Critical Librarianship, and the Triple Helix Dilemma, 42 Stan. L. Rev. 207 (1989).10 Id. citing Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Policies, 139 University of Chicago Legal Forum 198911 Id.12 See, e.g., Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, Why Do We Ask the Same Questions—The Triple Helix Dilemma Revisited, 99 Law Lib. J. 307 (2007).13 Id.14 Christopher Stone, Should Trees Have Standing − Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, 45 southern california law review 450 (1972).15 Yasmin Sokkar Harker, Invisible Hands and the Triple (Quadruple?) Helix Dilemma: Helping Students Free Their Minds, in Online Symposium: Critical Legal Research: The Next Wave (A Panel in Honor of Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic), 101 Boston University Law Review Online 17–25 (2021).16 William Sturkey, The Laws in Context, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/laws/the-laws-in-context/17 Leandro v. State, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997) (known as “Leandro I”); Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004) (known as “Leandro II”); and Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 879 S.E.2d 193 (2022) (as far as I know, this one doesn’t have a nickname yet).18 See, e.g., Leandro v. State of NC: Background & Resources, Public School Forum of North Carolina, www.ncforum.org/leandro/ and Tori Newby, The Leandro Case: A Summary of the Ongoing Debate about Educational Funding, The Daily Tar Heel (November 30, 2022, 12:40 AM EDT) www.dailytarheel.com/article/2022/11/city-leandro-case-supreme-court-ruling.19 I always include a joke about this being difficult to bill in six-minutes increments, because I want to remind students that we need to think practically about our research as well.20 Susan Nevelow Mart, Every Algorithm Has a Point of View, 22 AALL Spectrum 40 (2017).21 Hannah Jacobs, Algorithms of Resistance, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/about/algorithms-of-resistance/22 Id.23 Id.","PeriodicalId":39856,"journal":{"name":"Legal Reference Services Quarterly","volume":"161 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Legal Research, Artificial Intelligence, and Systemic Racism: Teaching with Jim Crow Text-Mining\",\"authors\":\"Ellie Campbell\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0270319x.2023.2264687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractOn the Books: Jim Crow and Algorithms of Existence is a text-mining project undertaken by University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill libraries to identify racially based laws passed in the state between 1865 and 1967. In the fall 2022, I used the On the Books project to teach a module in my Advanced Legal Research class on critical legal research and artificial intelligence and legal analytics. This article examines the benefits of those modules for teaching critical thinking about legal research structures and legacies of racism in the American legal system.Keywords: DEIcritical legal researchAIalgorithmspedagogyJim Crowracial discrimination Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Libraries, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/.2 Pauli Murray, States’ Laws on Race and Color (1951).3 William Sturkey, The Laws in Context, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/laws/the-laws-in-context/.4 UNC BLSA, BLSA’s Expectations of Administration & Faculty at UNC Law, Daily Tar Heel (June 28, 2020, 8:23 P.M. EDT), www.dailytarheel.com/gallery/blsa-gallery.5 For context, my ALR course is a 3-credit, full semester, experiential graded course. I cover secondary sources and primary law in the first two-thirds of the semester, and then shift to special topics in the last third. I taught the OTB modules on CLR and AI in the special topics section in early November 2022.6 Nicholas Mignanelli, Critical Legal Research: Who Needs It, 112 Law Lib. J. 327 (2020).7 Nicholas Mignanelli, Legal Research and Its Discontents: A Bibliographic Essay on Critical Approaches to Legal Research, 113 Law Lib. J. 101, 102 (2021); Nicholas F. Stump, Following New Lights: Critical Legal Research Strategies as a Spark for Law Reform in Appalachia, 23 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 573 (2014–2015).8 Id. generally.9 Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, Why Do We Tell the Same Stories: Law Reform, Critical Librarianship, and the Triple Helix Dilemma, 42 Stan. L. Rev. 207 (1989).10 Id. citing Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Policies, 139 University of Chicago Legal Forum 198911 Id.12 See, e.g., Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, Why Do We Ask the Same Questions—The Triple Helix Dilemma Revisited, 99 Law Lib. J. 307 (2007).13 Id.14 Christopher Stone, Should Trees Have Standing − Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, 45 southern california law review 450 (1972).15 Yasmin Sokkar Harker, Invisible Hands and the Triple (Quadruple?) Helix Dilemma: Helping Students Free Their Minds, in Online Symposium: Critical Legal Research: The Next Wave (A Panel in Honor of Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic), 101 Boston University Law Review Online 17–25 (2021).16 William Sturkey, The Laws in Context, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/laws/the-laws-in-context/17 Leandro v. State, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997) (known as “Leandro I”); Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004) (known as “Leandro II”); and Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 879 S.E.2d 193 (2022) (as far as I know, this one doesn’t have a nickname yet).18 See, e.g., Leandro v. State of NC: Background & Resources, Public School Forum of North Carolina, www.ncforum.org/leandro/ and Tori Newby, The Leandro Case: A Summary of the Ongoing Debate about Educational Funding, The Daily Tar Heel (November 30, 2022, 12:40 AM EDT) www.dailytarheel.com/article/2022/11/city-leandro-case-supreme-court-ruling.19 I always include a joke about this being difficult to bill in six-minutes increments, because I want to remind students that we need to think practically about our research as well.20 Susan Nevelow Mart, Every Algorithm Has a Point of View, 22 AALL Spectrum 40 (2017).21 Hannah Jacobs, Algorithms of Resistance, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/about/algorithms-of-resistance/22 Id.23 Id.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39856,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Legal Reference Services Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"161 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Legal Reference Services Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319x.2023.2264687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Reference Services Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0270319x.2023.2264687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

图书:吉姆·克劳和存在的算法是由北卡罗来纳大学教堂山图书馆开展的一个文本挖掘项目，旨在识别1865年至1967年间在该州通过的基于种族的法律。在2022年秋天，我用On the Books项目在我的高级法律研究课上教授一个关于批判性法律研究、人工智能和法律分析的模块。这篇文章探讨了这些模块的好处，为教学批判性思维的法律研究结构和遗产的种族主义在美国的法律制度。关键词:批判性法律研究算法教学方法种族歧视披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突注1:《在书中:吉姆·克劳和抵抗的算法》，北卡罗来纳大学教堂山图书馆，https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/.2保利·默里，《各州关于种族和肤色的法律》(1951)威廉·斯特基，语境中的法律，在书中:吉姆·克劳和抵抗的算法，https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/laws/the-laws-in-context/.4 UNC BLSA, BLSA对UNC法律的行政和教师的期望，每日Tar Heel(2020年6月28日，美国东部时间晚上8:23)，www.dailytarheel.com/gallery/blsa-gallery.5作为上下文，我的ALR课程是一个3学分，整个学期，体验式评分课程。我在本学期的前三分之二的时间里讲授第二手文献和主要法律，然后在最后三分之一的时间里转向专题。2022.6 Nicholas Mignanelli，批判性法律研究:谁需要它，112 Law Lib。J. 327 (2020)尼古拉斯·米格纳内利，《法律研究及其不满:法律研究批判方法参考文献》，113法律图书馆。J. 101, 102 (2021);Nicholas F. Stump，追随新光:关键的法律研究策略作为阿巴拉契亚法律改革的火花，23 Am。J.性别社会。[8] [j]Id。generally.9理查德·德尔加多和吉恩·斯蒂芬西，《为什么我们讲同样的故事:法律改革、批判性图书馆和三重螺旋困境》，42 Stan。L. Rev. 207 (1989).10Id。引用克伦肖著:《去边缘化种族与性别的交叉点:黑人女性主义对反歧视主义、女性主义理论和反种族主义政策的批判》，139《芝加哥大学法律论坛》(University of Chicago Legal Forum)， 198911，第12期。参见，例如，理查德·德加多、琼·斯蒂范奇:《为什么我们问同样的问题——重新审视三重螺旋困境》，99 Law Lib。[j] (2007)克里斯多夫·斯通，《树木是否应该站立——对自然物的合法权利》，45《南加州法律评论》450(1972)，第15页Yasmin Sokkar Harker《看不见的手和三重(四重?)》螺旋困境:帮助学生解放他们的思想，在网上研讨会:关键的法律研究:下一波(在理查德·德尔加多和吉恩·斯蒂芬奇的荣誉面板)，101波士顿大学法律评论在线17-25 (2021).16威廉·斯特基，背景中的法律，在册:吉姆·克劳和抵抗的算法，https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/laws/the-laws-in-context/17 Leandro v. State, 488 S.E.2d 249(1997)(被称为“Leandro I”);Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 599 S.E.2d 365(2004)(被称为“Leandro II”);和Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 879 S.E.2d 193(2022)(据我所知，这个案子还没有绰号)参见Leandro v. State of NC: Background & Resources, North Carolina公立学校论坛，www.ncforum.org/leandro/和Tori Newby, The Leandro Case:关于正在进行的关于教育经费的辩论的总结，the Daily Tar Heel(2022年11月30日，美国东部时间上午12:40)www.dailytarheel.com/article/2022/11/city-leandro-case-supreme-court-ruling.19我总是讲一个笑话，说这很难在6分钟的增量中结算，因为我想提醒学生，我们也需要实际地思考我们的研究Susan Nevelow Mart，每个算法都有一个观点，22 AALL光谱40 (2017).21汉娜·雅各布斯，《抵抗算法》，在书中:吉姆·克劳和抵抗算法，https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/about/algorithms-of-resistance/22 Id.23 Id。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Critical Legal Research, Artificial Intelligence, and Systemic Racism: Teaching with Jim Crow Text-Mining

AbstractOn the Books: Jim Crow and Algorithms of Existence is a text-mining project undertaken by University of North Carolina–Chapel Hill libraries to identify racially based laws passed in the state between 1865 and 1967. In the fall 2022, I used the On the Books project to teach a module in my Advanced Legal Research class on critical legal research and artificial intelligence and legal analytics. This article examines the benefits of those modules for teaching critical thinking about legal research structures and legacies of racism in the American legal system.Keywords: DEIcritical legal researchAIalgorithmspedagogyJim Crowracial discrimination Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill Libraries, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/.2 Pauli Murray, States’ Laws on Race and Color (1951).3 William Sturkey, The Laws in Context, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/laws/the-laws-in-context/.4 UNC BLSA, BLSA’s Expectations of Administration & Faculty at UNC Law, Daily Tar Heel (June 28, 2020, 8:23 P.M. EDT), www.dailytarheel.com/gallery/blsa-gallery.5 For context, my ALR course is a 3-credit, full semester, experiential graded course. I cover secondary sources and primary law in the first two-thirds of the semester, and then shift to special topics in the last third. I taught the OTB modules on CLR and AI in the special topics section in early November 2022.6 Nicholas Mignanelli, Critical Legal Research: Who Needs It, 112 Law Lib. J. 327 (2020).7 Nicholas Mignanelli, Legal Research and Its Discontents: A Bibliographic Essay on Critical Approaches to Legal Research, 113 Law Lib. J. 101, 102 (2021); Nicholas F. Stump, Following New Lights: Critical Legal Research Strategies as a Spark for Law Reform in Appalachia, 23 Am. U. J. Gender Soc. Pol’y & L. 573 (2014–2015).8 Id. generally.9 Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, Why Do We Tell the Same Stories: Law Reform, Critical Librarianship, and the Triple Helix Dilemma, 42 Stan. L. Rev. 207 (1989).10 Id. citing Crenshaw, Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory and Antiracist Policies, 139 University of Chicago Legal Forum 198911 Id.12 See, e.g., Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic, Why Do We Ask the Same Questions—The Triple Helix Dilemma Revisited, 99 Law Lib. J. 307 (2007).13 Id.14 Christopher Stone, Should Trees Have Standing − Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects, 45 southern california law review 450 (1972).15 Yasmin Sokkar Harker, Invisible Hands and the Triple (Quadruple?) Helix Dilemma: Helping Students Free Their Minds, in Online Symposium: Critical Legal Research: The Next Wave (A Panel in Honor of Richard Delgado and Jean Stefancic), 101 Boston University Law Review Online 17–25 (2021).16 William Sturkey, The Laws in Context, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/laws/the-laws-in-context/17 Leandro v. State, 488 S.E.2d 249 (1997) (known as “Leandro I”); Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 599 S.E.2d 365 (2004) (known as “Leandro II”); and Hoke County Board of Education v. State, 879 S.E.2d 193 (2022) (as far as I know, this one doesn’t have a nickname yet).18 See, e.g., Leandro v. State of NC: Background & Resources, Public School Forum of North Carolina, www.ncforum.org/leandro/ and Tori Newby, The Leandro Case: A Summary of the Ongoing Debate about Educational Funding, The Daily Tar Heel (November 30, 2022, 12:40 AM EDT) www.dailytarheel.com/article/2022/11/city-leandro-case-supreme-court-ruling.19 I always include a joke about this being difficult to bill in six-minutes increments, because I want to remind students that we need to think practically about our research as well.20 Susan Nevelow Mart, Every Algorithm Has a Point of View, 22 AALL Spectrum 40 (2017).21 Hannah Jacobs, Algorithms of Resistance, On the Books: Jim Crow and the Algorithms of Resistance, https://onthebooks.lib.unc.edu/about/algorithms-of-resistance/22 Id.23 Id.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Legal Reference Services Quarterly Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： An important forum for daily problems and issues, Legal Reference Services Quarterly will assist you in your day-to-day work as it has been helping other law librarians and members of the legal profession for over a decade. You will find articles that are serious, humorous, critical, or simply helpful to the working librarian. Annotated subject bibliographies, overviews of legal literature, reviews of commonly used tools, and the inclusion of reference problems unique to corporate law libraries, judicial libraries, and academic collections will keep you up-to-date on the continuously expanding volume of legal materials and their use in legal research.