多级验收不确定条件下可靠性论证的优化试验设计

IF 1.3 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Bingjie Wang, Lu Lu, Suiyao Chen, Mingyang Li
{"title":"多级验收不确定条件下可靠性论证的优化试验设计","authors":"Bingjie Wang, Lu Lu, Suiyao Chen, Mingyang Li","doi":"10.1080/08982112.2023.2249188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractA reliability demonstration test (RDT) plays a critical role in safeguarding product reliability and making sure it meets the target requirement. When planning an RDT, the test planning parameters are determined before executing the RDT. There is uncertainty associated with the test result and whether the product will be acceptable and released into the market with additional costs resulting from the warranty service or whether a reliability growth process is needed to further improve the product’s reliability. Potentially, such a process could be repeated multiple times depending on how quickly the reliability growth process can improve product reliability. Existing RDT designs primarily consider the cost of RDT itself or over a single demonstration stage before the next possible RDT, and hence fail to fully address the uncertainty of all possible future RDTs and various pathways a product may go through in a multi-stage demonstration process. By focusing on binomial RDT (BRDT) plans based on failure count data, this paper proposes an optimal Bayesian BRDT design framework by explicitly quantifying the multi-stage acceptance uncertainties resulting from current and subsequent BRDTs. It allows the BRDT planning decision to be determined more holistically by anticipating the costs of warranty service and reliability growth along different pathways over multiple stages. A recursive information propagation algorithm is proposed to incorporate the prior belief of product reliability and allow it to evolve and update over multiple stages of BRDT. A case study is presented to illustrate the proposed multi-stage Bayesian BRDT design framework and demonstrate its cost-efficiency compared to existing strategies. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis is also provided to demonstrate the impact of the relative size of different cost components, reliability growth rate, and prior setting on the performance of the proposed method.Keywords: bayesian reliabilityinformation propagationmulti-stage uncertaintiesoptimal test designreliability demonstration test Additional informationNotes on contributorsBingjie WangBingjie Wang is a PhD student in the Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. She received her MS in Industrial Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Her research interests include decision science, data science and AI techniques.Lu LuLu Lu is an Associate Professor of Statistics in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at the University of South Florida. She was a postdoctoral research associated in the Statistics Sciences Group at Los Alamos National Laboratory. She earned a doctorate in Statistics from Iowa State University. Her research interests include reliability analysis, design of experiments, response surface methodology, survey sampling, multiple objective/response optimization. She is a member of the American Statistical Association and the American Society for Quality.Suiyao ChenSuiyao Chen is Data Scientist at Amazon. He received his PhD in the Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. He also received his MA degree in Statistics from Columbia University. His research interests include reliability demonstration tests, Bayesian data analytics and warranty analysis.Mingyang LiMingyang Li is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. He received his PhD in Systems & Industrial Engineering and MS in Statistics from the University of Arizona. He also received a MS in Mechanical & Industrial Engineering from the University of Iowa. His research interests include reliability and quality assurance, Bayesian data analytics and system informatics. Dr. Li is a member of INFORMS, IISE and ASQ.","PeriodicalId":20846,"journal":{"name":"Quality Engineering","volume":"54 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal test design for reliability demonstration under multi-stage acceptance uncertainties\",\"authors\":\"Bingjie Wang, Lu Lu, Suiyao Chen, Mingyang Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08982112.2023.2249188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractA reliability demonstration test (RDT) plays a critical role in safeguarding product reliability and making sure it meets the target requirement. When planning an RDT, the test planning parameters are determined before executing the RDT. There is uncertainty associated with the test result and whether the product will be acceptable and released into the market with additional costs resulting from the warranty service or whether a reliability growth process is needed to further improve the product’s reliability. Potentially, such a process could be repeated multiple times depending on how quickly the reliability growth process can improve product reliability. Existing RDT designs primarily consider the cost of RDT itself or over a single demonstration stage before the next possible RDT, and hence fail to fully address the uncertainty of all possible future RDTs and various pathways a product may go through in a multi-stage demonstration process. By focusing on binomial RDT (BRDT) plans based on failure count data, this paper proposes an optimal Bayesian BRDT design framework by explicitly quantifying the multi-stage acceptance uncertainties resulting from current and subsequent BRDTs. It allows the BRDT planning decision to be determined more holistically by anticipating the costs of warranty service and reliability growth along different pathways over multiple stages. A recursive information propagation algorithm is proposed to incorporate the prior belief of product reliability and allow it to evolve and update over multiple stages of BRDT. A case study is presented to illustrate the proposed multi-stage Bayesian BRDT design framework and demonstrate its cost-efficiency compared to existing strategies. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis is also provided to demonstrate the impact of the relative size of different cost components, reliability growth rate, and prior setting on the performance of the proposed method.Keywords: bayesian reliabilityinformation propagationmulti-stage uncertaintiesoptimal test designreliability demonstration test Additional informationNotes on contributorsBingjie WangBingjie Wang is a PhD student in the Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. She received her MS in Industrial Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Her research interests include decision science, data science and AI techniques.Lu LuLu Lu is an Associate Professor of Statistics in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at the University of South Florida. She was a postdoctoral research associated in the Statistics Sciences Group at Los Alamos National Laboratory. She earned a doctorate in Statistics from Iowa State University. Her research interests include reliability analysis, design of experiments, response surface methodology, survey sampling, multiple objective/response optimization. She is a member of the American Statistical Association and the American Society for Quality.Suiyao ChenSuiyao Chen is Data Scientist at Amazon. He received his PhD in the Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. He also received his MA degree in Statistics from Columbia University. His research interests include reliability demonstration tests, Bayesian data analytics and warranty analysis.Mingyang LiMingyang Li is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. He received his PhD in Systems & Industrial Engineering and MS in Statistics from the University of Arizona. He also received a MS in Mechanical & Industrial Engineering from the University of Iowa. His research interests include reliability and quality assurance, Bayesian data analytics and system informatics. Dr. Li is a member of INFORMS, IISE and ASQ.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality Engineering\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2023.2249188\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08982112.2023.2249188","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要可靠性验证试验(RDT)在保障产品可靠性、确保产品达到目标要求方面起着至关重要的作用。当计划RDT时,在执行RDT之前确定测试计划参数。测试结果的不确定性,以及产品是否可以被接受并投放市场,以及是否需要一个可靠性增长过程来进一步提高产品的可靠性。根据可靠性增长过程提高产品可靠性的速度,这样的过程可能会重复多次。现有的RDT设计主要考虑RDT本身的成本或在下一个可能的RDT之前的单个演示阶段的成本,因此无法完全解决所有可能的未来RDT的不确定性以及产品在多阶段演示过程中可能经历的各种途径。本文以基于失效计数数据的二项RDT (BRDT)方案为研究对象,通过明确量化当前和后续BRDT产生的多阶段可接受不确定性,提出了最优贝叶斯BRDT设计框架。它允许BRDT规划决策更全面地确定,通过预测保修服务的成本和可靠性增长沿着不同的路径在多个阶段。提出了一种包含产品可靠性先验信念的递归信息传播算法,并允许其在BRDT的多个阶段中进化和更新。通过一个案例研究来说明所提出的多阶段贝叶斯BRDT设计框架,并与现有策略相比证明其成本效率。综合灵敏度分析表明,不同成本成分的相对大小、可靠性增长率和先验设置对所提方法性能的影响。关键词:贝叶斯信度信息传播多阶段不确定性最优测试设计可靠性论证测试附加信息投稿人说明王炳杰王炳杰是南佛罗里达大学工业与管理系统工程系博士生。她获得了纽约州立大学布法罗分校工业工程硕士学位。她的研究兴趣包括决策科学、数据科学和人工智能技术。Lu LuLu Lu是南佛罗里达大学数学与统计系统计学副教授。她是洛斯阿拉莫斯国家实验室统计科学小组的博士后研究员。她在爱荷华州立大学获得统计学博士学位。主要研究方向为信度分析、实验设计、响应面方法、调查抽样、多目标/响应优化。她是美国统计协会和美国质量协会的成员。本文作者是亚马逊的数据科学家。他在南佛罗里达大学工业与管理系统工程系获得博士学位。他还获得了哥伦比亚大学统计学硕士学位。主要研究方向为可靠性验证试验、贝叶斯数据分析和质保分析。李明阳,南佛罗里达大学工业与管理系统工程系副教授。他在亚利桑那大学获得系统与工业工程博士学位和统计学硕士学位。他还获得了爱荷华大学机械与工业工程硕士学位。他的研究兴趣包括可靠性和质量保证、贝叶斯数据分析和系统信息学。李博士是INFORMS, IISE和ASQ的成员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimal test design for reliability demonstration under multi-stage acceptance uncertainties
AbstractA reliability demonstration test (RDT) plays a critical role in safeguarding product reliability and making sure it meets the target requirement. When planning an RDT, the test planning parameters are determined before executing the RDT. There is uncertainty associated with the test result and whether the product will be acceptable and released into the market with additional costs resulting from the warranty service or whether a reliability growth process is needed to further improve the product’s reliability. Potentially, such a process could be repeated multiple times depending on how quickly the reliability growth process can improve product reliability. Existing RDT designs primarily consider the cost of RDT itself or over a single demonstration stage before the next possible RDT, and hence fail to fully address the uncertainty of all possible future RDTs and various pathways a product may go through in a multi-stage demonstration process. By focusing on binomial RDT (BRDT) plans based on failure count data, this paper proposes an optimal Bayesian BRDT design framework by explicitly quantifying the multi-stage acceptance uncertainties resulting from current and subsequent BRDTs. It allows the BRDT planning decision to be determined more holistically by anticipating the costs of warranty service and reliability growth along different pathways over multiple stages. A recursive information propagation algorithm is proposed to incorporate the prior belief of product reliability and allow it to evolve and update over multiple stages of BRDT. A case study is presented to illustrate the proposed multi-stage Bayesian BRDT design framework and demonstrate its cost-efficiency compared to existing strategies. A comprehensive sensitivity analysis is also provided to demonstrate the impact of the relative size of different cost components, reliability growth rate, and prior setting on the performance of the proposed method.Keywords: bayesian reliabilityinformation propagationmulti-stage uncertaintiesoptimal test designreliability demonstration test Additional informationNotes on contributorsBingjie WangBingjie Wang is a PhD student in the Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. She received her MS in Industrial Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Her research interests include decision science, data science and AI techniques.Lu LuLu Lu is an Associate Professor of Statistics in the Department of Mathematics and Statistics at the University of South Florida. She was a postdoctoral research associated in the Statistics Sciences Group at Los Alamos National Laboratory. She earned a doctorate in Statistics from Iowa State University. Her research interests include reliability analysis, design of experiments, response surface methodology, survey sampling, multiple objective/response optimization. She is a member of the American Statistical Association and the American Society for Quality.Suiyao ChenSuiyao Chen is Data Scientist at Amazon. He received his PhD in the Department of Industrial and Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. He also received his MA degree in Statistics from Columbia University. His research interests include reliability demonstration tests, Bayesian data analytics and warranty analysis.Mingyang LiMingyang Li is an Associate Professor in the Department of Industrial & Management Systems Engineering at the University of South Florida. He received his PhD in Systems & Industrial Engineering and MS in Statistics from the University of Arizona. He also received a MS in Mechanical & Industrial Engineering from the University of Iowa. His research interests include reliability and quality assurance, Bayesian data analytics and system informatics. Dr. Li is a member of INFORMS, IISE and ASQ.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality Engineering
Quality Engineering ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-STATISTICS & PROBABILITY
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
52
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality Engineering aims to promote a rich exchange among the quality engineering community by publishing papers that describe new engineering methods ready for immediate industrial application or examples of techniques uniquely employed. You are invited to submit manuscripts and application experiences that explore: Experimental engineering design and analysis Measurement system analysis in engineering Engineering process modelling Product and process optimization in engineering Quality control and process monitoring in engineering Engineering regression Reliability in engineering Response surface methodology in engineering Robust engineering parameter design Six Sigma method enhancement in engineering Statistical engineering Engineering test and evaluation techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信