罗马尼亚语的不对称协调:DOM位置的诊断?

IF 1.6 1区文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Linguistic Inquiry Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1162/ling_a_00522

Monica Alexandrina Irimia

{"title":"罗马尼亚语的不对称协调:DOM位置的诊断?","authors":"Monica Alexandrina Irimia","doi":"10.1162/ling_a_00522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The question of whether differentially marked objects require raising is not a simple one for languages like Romanian. Kalin and Weisser (2019) use asymmetric coordination involving marked and unmarked objects to support the hypothesis that both classes (can) share the same position. Here we point out numerous complications in the data; crucially, it cannot be confirmed that asymmetric coordination applies at the DP level in Romanian. This raises doubts about the reliability of asymmetric coordination as a test for DOM position in the language.","PeriodicalId":48044,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Inquiry","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Asymmetric Coordination in Romanian: A Diagnostic for DOM Position?\",\"authors\":\"Monica Alexandrina Irimia\",\"doi\":\"10.1162/ling_a_00522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The question of whether differentially marked objects require raising is not a simple one for languages like Romanian. Kalin and Weisser (2019) use asymmetric coordination involving marked and unmarked objects to support the hypothesis that both classes (can) share the same position. Here we point out numerous complications in the data; crucially, it cannot be confirmed that asymmetric coordination applies at the DP level in Romanian. This raises doubts about the reliability of asymmetric coordination as a test for DOM position in the language.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistic Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00522\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1162/ling_a_00522","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

对于像罗马尼亚语这样的语言来说，区别标记的物体是否需要提升的问题并不简单。Kalin和Weisser(2019)使用涉及标记和未标记物体的不对称协调来支持两个类别(可以)共享相同位置的假设。在这里，我们指出了数据中的许多复杂性;至关重要的是，不能证实不对称协调在罗马尼亚的DP一级适用。这引起了对不对称协调作为语言中DOM位置测试的可靠性的怀疑。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Asymmetric Coordination in Romanian: A Diagnostic for DOM Position?

Abstract The question of whether differentially marked objects require raising is not a simple one for languages like Romanian. Kalin and Weisser (2019) use asymmetric coordination involving marked and unmarked objects to support the hypothesis that both classes (can) share the same position. Here we point out numerous complications in the data; crucially, it cannot be confirmed that asymmetric coordination applies at the DP level in Romanian. This raises doubts about the reliability of asymmetric coordination as a test for DOM position in the language.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Linguistic Inquiry Multiple-

CiteScore

2.50

自引率

12.50%

发文量

期刊介绍： Linguistic Inquiry leads the field in research on current topics in linguistics. This key resource explores new theoretical developments based on the latest international scholarship, capturing the excitement of contemporary debate in full-scale articles as well as shorter contributions (Squibs and Discussion) and more extensive commentary (Remarks and Replies).