CIA SOLANKE , MIKE T JOHN , MARKUS EBEL , SARRA ALTNER , KATRIN BEKES
{"title":"学龄儿童的 ohip-5","authors":"CIA SOLANKE , MIKE T JOHN , MARKUS EBEL , SARRA ALTNER , KATRIN BEKES","doi":"10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Different dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) exist for children and adults, leading to an incompatibility in outcome assessment in these 2 age groups. However, the dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact are the same in the 2 groups, providing an opportunity for compatible dPRO assessment if dPROMs were identical. Therefore, we adapted the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5), a recommended dPROM for adults, to school-aged children to allow a standardized dPRO assessment in individuals aged 7 years and above.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>It was the aim of this study to develop a 5-item OHIP for school-aged children (OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>) and to investigate the instrument's score reliability and validity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>German-speaking children (N = 95, mean age: 8.6 years +/- 1.3 years, 55% girls) from the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria and a private dental practice in Bergisch Gladbach, Germany participated. The original OHIP-5 was modified and adapted for school going children aged 7-13 years and this modified version was termed OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>. It's score reliability was studied by determining scores’ internal consistency and temporal stability by calculating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients, respectively. Construct validity was assessed comparing OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> scores with OHIP-5 as well as Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G<sub>8-10</sub>) scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Score reliability for the OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> was “good” (Cronbach's alpha: 0.81) or “excellent” (Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.92). High correlations between OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>, OHIP-5, and CPQ-G<sub>8-10</sub> scores were observed and hypotheses about a pattern of these correlations were confirmed, providing evidence for score validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> and the original OHIP-5 are short and psychometrically sound instruments to measure the oral health related quality of life in school-aged children, providing an opportunity for a standardized oral health impact assessment with the same metric in school-aged children, adolescents, and adults.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48736,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"Article 101947"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223001434/pdfft?md5=c13106aa039e5f20702aae0eb08937d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1532338223001434-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"OHIP-5 FOR SCHOOL-AGED CHILDREN\",\"authors\":\"CIA SOLANKE , MIKE T JOHN , MARKUS EBEL , SARRA ALTNER , KATRIN BEKES\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jebdp.2023.101947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Different dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) exist for children and adults, leading to an incompatibility in outcome assessment in these 2 age groups. However, the dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact are the same in the 2 groups, providing an opportunity for compatible dPRO assessment if dPROMs were identical. Therefore, we adapted the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5), a recommended dPROM for adults, to school-aged children to allow a standardized dPRO assessment in individuals aged 7 years and above.</p></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><p>It was the aim of this study to develop a 5-item OHIP for school-aged children (OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>) and to investigate the instrument's score reliability and validity.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>German-speaking children (N = 95, mean age: 8.6 years +/- 1.3 years, 55% girls) from the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria and a private dental practice in Bergisch Gladbach, Germany participated. The original OHIP-5 was modified and adapted for school going children aged 7-13 years and this modified version was termed OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>. It's score reliability was studied by determining scores’ internal consistency and temporal stability by calculating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients, respectively. Construct validity was assessed comparing OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> scores with OHIP-5 as well as Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G<sub>8-10</sub>) scores.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Score reliability for the OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> was “good” (Cronbach's alpha: 0.81) or “excellent” (Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.92). High correlations between OHIP-5<sub>School</sub>, OHIP-5, and CPQ-G<sub>8-10</sub> scores were observed and hypotheses about a pattern of these correlations were confirmed, providing evidence for score validity.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The OHIP-5<sub>School</sub> and the original OHIP-5 are short and psychometrically sound instruments to measure the oral health related quality of life in school-aged children, providing an opportunity for a standardized oral health impact assessment with the same metric in school-aged children, adolescents, and adults.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48736,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 101947\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223001434/pdfft?md5=c13106aa039e5f20702aae0eb08937d4&pid=1-s2.0-S1532338223001434-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223001434\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1532338223001434","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Different dental patient-reported outcome measures (dPROMs) exist for children and adults, leading to an incompatibility in outcome assessment in these 2 age groups. However, the dental patient-reported outcomes (dPROs) Oral Function, Orofacial Pain, Orofacial Appearance, and Psychosocial Impact are the same in the 2 groups, providing an opportunity for compatible dPRO assessment if dPROMs were identical. Therefore, we adapted the 5-item Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-5), a recommended dPROM for adults, to school-aged children to allow a standardized dPRO assessment in individuals aged 7 years and above.
Aim
It was the aim of this study to develop a 5-item OHIP for school-aged children (OHIP-5School) and to investigate the instrument's score reliability and validity.
Methods
German-speaking children (N = 95, mean age: 8.6 years +/- 1.3 years, 55% girls) from the Department of Pediatric Dentistry at the Medical University of Vienna, Austria and a private dental practice in Bergisch Gladbach, Germany participated. The original OHIP-5 was modified and adapted for school going children aged 7-13 years and this modified version was termed OHIP-5School. It's score reliability was studied by determining scores’ internal consistency and temporal stability by calculating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients, respectively. Construct validity was assessed comparing OHIP-5School scores with OHIP-5 as well as Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ-G8-10) scores.
Results
Score reliability for the OHIP-5School was “good” (Cronbach's alpha: 0.81) or “excellent” (Intraclass correlation coefficient: 0.92). High correlations between OHIP-5School, OHIP-5, and CPQ-G8-10 scores were observed and hypotheses about a pattern of these correlations were confirmed, providing evidence for score validity.
Conclusion
The OHIP-5School and the original OHIP-5 are short and psychometrically sound instruments to measure the oral health related quality of life in school-aged children, providing an opportunity for a standardized oral health impact assessment with the same metric in school-aged children, adolescents, and adults.
期刊介绍：
The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice presents timely original articles, as well as reviews of articles on the results and outcomes of clinical procedures and treatment. The Journal advocates the use or rejection of a procedure based on solid, clinical evidence found in literature. The Journal''s dynamic operating principles are explicitness in process and objectives, publication of the highest-quality reviews and original articles, and an emphasis on objectivity.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
