牙种植体口腔康复中骨密度灰度值测定的可靠性

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Shalu Rai, Deepankar Misra, Akansha Misra, Himanshi Tomar, Ayush Dhawan, Rohit Gupta
{"title":"牙种植体口腔康复中骨密度灰度值测定的可靠性","authors":"Shalu Rai, Deepankar Misra, Akansha Misra, Himanshi Tomar, Ayush Dhawan, Rohit Gupta","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_3_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Quality and quantity of jaw bones have been previously classified in literature using different methods. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), successfully determine bone density of jaws. This study aims to establish the role of cone-beam CT (CBCT) in determining the density of cortical and cancellous bones at different jaw sites. Materials and Methods: Eighty-three possible implant sites in healthy patients were evaluated using NewTomGiano CBCT machine. Cross-sections were obtained and cortical and cancellous bone densities on different aspects of the virtual implant in terms of Hounsfield unit (HU) were determined using New Net Technologies software version 6.1 and were classified according to software from D1 to D4. Data were entered into SPSS software (version 19.0) and were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean HU showed the highest value for cortical and cancellous in the anterior mandible (mean HU 1874.01 and 1131.73, respectively) followed by the posterior mandible (mean HU 1789.20 and 872.95, respectively) and least in posterior maxilla (mean HU 1068.26 and 830.04, respectively). Maximum D1 bone type was found in cortical bone and D2 bone type was noted in cancellous bone area. Males showed very highly significant cortical bone thickness ( P < 0.001) whereas females showed more cancellous bone thickness but the results were nonsignificant. Conclusion: A high degree of concordance between different regions of jaw bones with a strong correlation between the four bone types was obtained. Bone density plays a pivotal role in determining the prognosis of the implant. CBCT has proven to be beneficial in bone density analysis.","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"167 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reliability of Grayscale Value for Bone Density Determination in Oral Rehabilitation using Dental Implants\",\"authors\":\"Shalu Rai, Deepankar Misra, Akansha Misra, Himanshi Tomar, Ayush Dhawan, Rohit Gupta\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_3_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Quality and quantity of jaw bones have been previously classified in literature using different methods. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), successfully determine bone density of jaws. This study aims to establish the role of cone-beam CT (CBCT) in determining the density of cortical and cancellous bones at different jaw sites. Materials and Methods: Eighty-three possible implant sites in healthy patients were evaluated using NewTomGiano CBCT machine. Cross-sections were obtained and cortical and cancellous bone densities on different aspects of the virtual implant in terms of Hounsfield unit (HU) were determined using New Net Technologies software version 6.1 and were classified according to software from D1 to D4. Data were entered into SPSS software (version 19.0) and were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean HU showed the highest value for cortical and cancellous in the anterior mandible (mean HU 1874.01 and 1131.73, respectively) followed by the posterior mandible (mean HU 1789.20 and 872.95, respectively) and least in posterior maxilla (mean HU 1068.26 and 830.04, respectively). Maximum D1 bone type was found in cortical bone and D2 bone type was noted in cancellous bone area. Males showed very highly significant cortical bone thickness ( P < 0.001) whereas females showed more cancellous bone thickness but the results were nonsignificant. Conclusion: A high degree of concordance between different regions of jaw bones with a strong correlation between the four bone types was obtained. Bone density plays a pivotal role in determining the prognosis of the implant. CBCT has proven to be beneficial in bone density analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"167 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_3_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_3_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文献中已经用不同的方法对颌骨的质量和数量进行了分类。成像方式,如计算机断层扫描(CT),成功地确定颌骨的骨密度。本研究旨在建立锥形束CT (CBCT)在确定不同颌骨部位皮质骨和松质骨密度中的作用。材料与方法:使用NewTomGiano CBCT机对健康患者的83个可能的种植部位进行评估。采用New Net Technologies软件版本6.1获取虚拟种植体的横截面,以Hounsfield单位(HU)计算虚拟种植体不同方面的皮质骨密度和松质骨密度,并根据软件从D1到D4进行分类。数据输入SPSS软件(19.0版)进行统计分析。结果:前颌骨皮质和松质层平均HU最高,分别为1874.01和1131.73,后颌骨次之,分别为1789.20和872.95,后颌骨最低,分别为1068.26和830.04。皮质骨区D1骨型最多,松质骨区D2骨型最多。男性的皮质骨厚度非常显著(P <0.001),而女性表现出更多的松质骨厚度,但结果不显著。结论:颌骨的不同区域之间具有高度的一致性,四种骨类型之间具有很强的相关性。骨密度在决定种植体预后方面起着关键作用。CBCT已被证明在骨密度分析中是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reliability of Grayscale Value for Bone Density Determination in Oral Rehabilitation using Dental Implants
Introduction: Quality and quantity of jaw bones have been previously classified in literature using different methods. Imaging modalities such as computed tomography (CT), successfully determine bone density of jaws. This study aims to establish the role of cone-beam CT (CBCT) in determining the density of cortical and cancellous bones at different jaw sites. Materials and Methods: Eighty-three possible implant sites in healthy patients were evaluated using NewTomGiano CBCT machine. Cross-sections were obtained and cortical and cancellous bone densities on different aspects of the virtual implant in terms of Hounsfield unit (HU) were determined using New Net Technologies software version 6.1 and were classified according to software from D1 to D4. Data were entered into SPSS software (version 19.0) and were statistically analyzed. Results: The mean HU showed the highest value for cortical and cancellous in the anterior mandible (mean HU 1874.01 and 1131.73, respectively) followed by the posterior mandible (mean HU 1789.20 and 872.95, respectively) and least in posterior maxilla (mean HU 1068.26 and 830.04, respectively). Maximum D1 bone type was found in cortical bone and D2 bone type was noted in cancellous bone area. Males showed very highly significant cortical bone thickness ( P < 0.001) whereas females showed more cancellous bone thickness but the results were nonsignificant. Conclusion: A high degree of concordance between different regions of jaw bones with a strong correlation between the four bone types was obtained. Bone density plays a pivotal role in determining the prognosis of the implant. CBCT has proven to be beneficial in bone density analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信