书评:评估临床能力的工具箱

IF 0.8 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
K. Ramnarayan
{"title":"书评:评估临床能力的工具箱","authors":"K. Ramnarayan","doi":"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_400_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Editors: Tejinder Singh and Rajiv Mahajan Publisher: Unistar Books Pvt Ltd., Chandigarh Year of publication: 2023 Price: Rs. 250 Number of pages: 124 Tagging objectives to assessment has become the hallmark of a robust curriculum; yet, it has been a daunting task to accomplish this pragmatically. In 1996, van der Vleuten so trenchantly said “assessment drives learning in at least four ways: its content, format, timing, and any subsequent feedback given to the examinee.” Over a quarter century later we, in medical education, are grappling with the knotty task of meaningfully aligning the assessment to the objectives. Scriven’s definition of assessment in 1991 envisaged a systematic, objective determination of merit, worth, or value to distinguish between the worthy and the unworthy. However, this definition had ignored formative assessment altogether. Moreover, the emphasis of today’s assessment has shifted toward integration to assess the ability of a student to integrate knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values into a clinical situation. It is in the background of this scenario that the manual “Toolbox for Assessment of Clinical Competence” edited by Tejinder Singh and Rajiv Mahajan becomes contextually relevant and timely. The authors have, in this repertoire, not only captured formative and summative assessments with all its nuances but have also linked the assessment tools to the various levels of Miller’s pyramid. The thoroughness with which the editors have organized the content is testimony to their expertise and ingenuity. Classifying assessment tools under the categories of “knows and knows how,” “shows,” and “does” is a refreshing approach to understanding and implementing the various assessment strategies. This manual is a primer in the assessment of clinical competence while serving as a ready reckoner with the choicest compendium of invaluable references for more in-depth exploration. A medical educator who is serious and sincere about using the power of assessment to decide the learning of competencies will derive a wealth of ideas from this treasury of assessment. Every medical education unit in a medical college as well as every practitioner of health professions education will be enriched and empowered by this sourcebook, which could serve as a guidepost to conceive and practice various approaches to measurement of competence while conceding that not everything that matters can or need to be measured! “Students can, with difficulty, escape from the effects of poor teaching, but they cannot (if they want to graduate) escape the effects of poor assessment” said David Boud. Therefore, it is incumbent on all of us, as educators, to strive to make assessment in health sciences meet its laudable goals, which this book has so masterfully accomplished.","PeriodicalId":13727,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Toolbox for Assessment of Clinical Competence\",\"authors\":\"K. Ramnarayan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_400_23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Editors: Tejinder Singh and Rajiv Mahajan Publisher: Unistar Books Pvt Ltd., Chandigarh Year of publication: 2023 Price: Rs. 250 Number of pages: 124 Tagging objectives to assessment has become the hallmark of a robust curriculum; yet, it has been a daunting task to accomplish this pragmatically. In 1996, van der Vleuten so trenchantly said “assessment drives learning in at least four ways: its content, format, timing, and any subsequent feedback given to the examinee.” Over a quarter century later we, in medical education, are grappling with the knotty task of meaningfully aligning the assessment to the objectives. Scriven’s definition of assessment in 1991 envisaged a systematic, objective determination of merit, worth, or value to distinguish between the worthy and the unworthy. However, this definition had ignored formative assessment altogether. Moreover, the emphasis of today’s assessment has shifted toward integration to assess the ability of a student to integrate knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values into a clinical situation. It is in the background of this scenario that the manual “Toolbox for Assessment of Clinical Competence” edited by Tejinder Singh and Rajiv Mahajan becomes contextually relevant and timely. The authors have, in this repertoire, not only captured formative and summative assessments with all its nuances but have also linked the assessment tools to the various levels of Miller’s pyramid. The thoroughness with which the editors have organized the content is testimony to their expertise and ingenuity. Classifying assessment tools under the categories of “knows and knows how,” “shows,” and “does” is a refreshing approach to understanding and implementing the various assessment strategies. This manual is a primer in the assessment of clinical competence while serving as a ready reckoner with the choicest compendium of invaluable references for more in-depth exploration. A medical educator who is serious and sincere about using the power of assessment to decide the learning of competencies will derive a wealth of ideas from this treasury of assessment. Every medical education unit in a medical college as well as every practitioner of health professions education will be enriched and empowered by this sourcebook, which could serve as a guidepost to conceive and practice various approaches to measurement of competence while conceding that not everything that matters can or need to be measured! “Students can, with difficulty, escape from the effects of poor teaching, but they cannot (if they want to graduate) escape the effects of poor assessment” said David Boud. Therefore, it is incumbent on all of us, as educators, to strive to make assessment in health sciences meet its laudable goals, which this book has so masterfully accomplished.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_400_23\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Applied and Basic Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijabmr.ijabmr_400_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

编辑:Tejinder Singh和Rajiv Mahajan出版社:Unistar Books Pvt Ltd.,昌迪加尔出版年份:2023价格:250卢比页数:124标记目标的评估已成为一个强大的课程的标志;然而,务实地实现这一目标是一项艰巨的任务。1996年,van der Vleuten非常尖锐地说:“评估至少在四个方面推动学习:它的内容、形式、时间以及随后给考生的任何反馈。”四分之一个世纪过去了,在医学教育中,我们正在努力解决使评估与目标有意义地保持一致的棘手任务。Scriven在1991年对评估的定义设想了一个系统的、客观的优点、价值或价值的确定,以区分值得和不值得。然而,这个定义完全忽略了形成性评价。此外,今天评估的重点已经转向整合,以评估学生将知识、技能、态度和价值观整合到临床情境中的能力。正是在这种情况的背景下,由Tejinder Singh和Rajiv Mahajan编辑的手册“临床能力评估工具箱”变得具有上下文相关性和时代性。作者们,在这个节目中,不仅抓住了形成性和总结性评估的所有细微差别,而且还将评估工具与米勒金字塔的各个层次联系起来。编辑组织内容的彻底性证明了他们的专业知识和独创性。将评估工具分类为“知道和知道如何”、“显示”和“做”是理解和实现各种评估策略的一种令人耳目一新的方法。本手册是在临床能力的评估入门,同时作为一个现成的计算与选择的宝贵的参考汇编更深入的探索。一位认真而真诚地利用评估的力量来决定能力学习的医学教育者将从评估宝库中获得丰富的思想。每一个医学院校的医学教育单位以及每一个卫生专业教育的从业者都将通过这本资料手册得到丰富和授权,它可以作为一个指南,在承认并非所有重要的事情都可以或需要被衡量的同时,构思和实践各种衡量能力的方法!David Boud说:“学生们可以很困难地摆脱糟糕教学的影响,但他们无法(如果他们想毕业的话)摆脱糟糕评估的影响。”因此,作为教育工作者,我们所有人都有责任努力使健康科学评估达到其值得称赞的目标,这本书已经如此巧妙地完成了这一目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Book Review: Toolbox for Assessment of Clinical Competence
Editors: Tejinder Singh and Rajiv Mahajan Publisher: Unistar Books Pvt Ltd., Chandigarh Year of publication: 2023 Price: Rs. 250 Number of pages: 124 Tagging objectives to assessment has become the hallmark of a robust curriculum; yet, it has been a daunting task to accomplish this pragmatically. In 1996, van der Vleuten so trenchantly said “assessment drives learning in at least four ways: its content, format, timing, and any subsequent feedback given to the examinee.” Over a quarter century later we, in medical education, are grappling with the knotty task of meaningfully aligning the assessment to the objectives. Scriven’s definition of assessment in 1991 envisaged a systematic, objective determination of merit, worth, or value to distinguish between the worthy and the unworthy. However, this definition had ignored formative assessment altogether. Moreover, the emphasis of today’s assessment has shifted toward integration to assess the ability of a student to integrate knowledge, skills, attitudes, and values into a clinical situation. It is in the background of this scenario that the manual “Toolbox for Assessment of Clinical Competence” edited by Tejinder Singh and Rajiv Mahajan becomes contextually relevant and timely. The authors have, in this repertoire, not only captured formative and summative assessments with all its nuances but have also linked the assessment tools to the various levels of Miller’s pyramid. The thoroughness with which the editors have organized the content is testimony to their expertise and ingenuity. Classifying assessment tools under the categories of “knows and knows how,” “shows,” and “does” is a refreshing approach to understanding and implementing the various assessment strategies. This manual is a primer in the assessment of clinical competence while serving as a ready reckoner with the choicest compendium of invaluable references for more in-depth exploration. A medical educator who is serious and sincere about using the power of assessment to decide the learning of competencies will derive a wealth of ideas from this treasury of assessment. Every medical education unit in a medical college as well as every practitioner of health professions education will be enriched and empowered by this sourcebook, which could serve as a guidepost to conceive and practice various approaches to measurement of competence while conceding that not everything that matters can or need to be measured! “Students can, with difficulty, escape from the effects of poor teaching, but they cannot (if they want to graduate) escape the effects of poor assessment” said David Boud. Therefore, it is incumbent on all of us, as educators, to strive to make assessment in health sciences meet its laudable goals, which this book has so masterfully accomplished.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信