是什么让一个城市“聪明”?谁来决定?美国交通部智慧城市挑战赛从愿景到现实

IF 4.6 3区 经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES
Jae Teuk Chin, Andrew Guthrie
{"title":"是什么让一个城市“聪明”?谁来决定?美国交通部智慧城市挑战赛从愿景到现实","authors":"Jae Teuk Chin, Andrew Guthrie","doi":"10.1080/10630732.2023.2253708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThe concept of a “smart city” has gained currency in urban policy as a recognition of the potentially transformative role advanced information technology will play in city operations as the twenty-first century progresses. Who decides what makes a city smart and who is that smart city for are crucial questions for the urbanist literature to systematically address. Despite the concept’s recent popularity, “smart city” is a contested term and remains a chaotic dimension of urban theory. Theorizing the smart city in a US context must address a particular mix of built forms, public policies, and social conditions—all of which shape how transportation and other systems help constitute the city. To deepen understanding of the smart city concept in both theory and practice, this research explores the framing, construction, and contestation of the smart city concept through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) Smart City Challenge (SCC), launched in 2015 as a competitive grant program with the intent to provide a spark for incentivizing the development of smart infrastructure in mid-sized US cities. We compare the action plans of the seven finalist cities selected to create plans to implement their visions, including Columbus, Ohio, the eventual winner. We employ interpretivist content and discourse analysis of the applications and award decision, as well as of early implementation in Columbus, to explore shared meanings of recurring themes and key concepts, building a grounded theory of the smart city in the US context. The findings of the comparative analysis reveal further insights into prevailing challenges in smart city deployment, particularly for areas lacking inherent technology platforms.KEYWORDS: smart cityvision elements (VEs)U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)Smart City Challenge (SCC)Columbus Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJae Teuk ChinJae Teuk Chin is an associate professor in the International School of Urban Sciences at the University of Seoul.Andrew GuthrieAndrew Guthrie is an assistant professor in the Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of Memphis.","PeriodicalId":47593,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urban Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What Makes a City “Smart” and Who Decides? From Vision to Reality in the USDOT Smart City Challenge\",\"authors\":\"Jae Teuk Chin, Andrew Guthrie\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10630732.2023.2253708\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACTThe concept of a “smart city” has gained currency in urban policy as a recognition of the potentially transformative role advanced information technology will play in city operations as the twenty-first century progresses. Who decides what makes a city smart and who is that smart city for are crucial questions for the urbanist literature to systematically address. Despite the concept’s recent popularity, “smart city” is a contested term and remains a chaotic dimension of urban theory. Theorizing the smart city in a US context must address a particular mix of built forms, public policies, and social conditions—all of which shape how transportation and other systems help constitute the city. To deepen understanding of the smart city concept in both theory and practice, this research explores the framing, construction, and contestation of the smart city concept through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) Smart City Challenge (SCC), launched in 2015 as a competitive grant program with the intent to provide a spark for incentivizing the development of smart infrastructure in mid-sized US cities. We compare the action plans of the seven finalist cities selected to create plans to implement their visions, including Columbus, Ohio, the eventual winner. We employ interpretivist content and discourse analysis of the applications and award decision, as well as of early implementation in Columbus, to explore shared meanings of recurring themes and key concepts, building a grounded theory of the smart city in the US context. The findings of the comparative analysis reveal further insights into prevailing challenges in smart city deployment, particularly for areas lacking inherent technology platforms.KEYWORDS: smart cityvision elements (VEs)U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)Smart City Challenge (SCC)Columbus Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJae Teuk ChinJae Teuk Chin is an associate professor in the International School of Urban Sciences at the University of Seoul.Andrew GuthrieAndrew Guthrie is an assistant professor in the Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of Memphis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47593,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Urban Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Urban Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2253708\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"URBAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urban Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2023.2253708","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"URBAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要随着二十一世纪的发展,先进的信息技术将在城市运营中发挥潜在的变革性作用,“智慧城市”的概念已经在城市政策中得到了广泛的认可。谁来决定什么是智慧城市,智慧城市是为谁服务,这些都是城市学家需要系统解决的关键问题。尽管这个概念最近很流行,但“智慧城市”是一个有争议的术语,仍然是城市理论的一个混乱维度。在美国的背景下,对智慧城市进行理论化必须解决建筑形式、公共政策和社会条件的特殊组合,所有这些都决定了交通和其他系统如何帮助构成城市。为了在理论和实践上加深对智慧城市概念的理解,本研究通过美国交通部(USDOT)的智慧城市挑战(SCC)探索了智慧城市概念的框架、建设和争论,该挑战于2015年启动,是一项竞争性拨款计划,旨在为激励美国中型城市智能基础设施的发展提供动力。我们比较了七个入围城市的行动计划,这些城市被选中制定计划来实现他们的愿景,其中包括最终的获胜者俄亥俄州的哥伦布市。我们采用解释主义的内容和话语分析的申请和奖励决定,以及在哥伦布市的早期实施,探索反复出现的主题和关键概念的共同意义,在美国背景下建立智慧城市的基础理论。对比分析的结果进一步揭示了智慧城市部署面临的挑战,特别是在缺乏固有技术平台的地区。关键词:智慧城市视觉元素(VEs)美国交通部(USDOT)智慧城市挑战(SCC)哥伦布披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本文作者jae Teuk Chin是首尔大学国际城市科学学院的副教授。Andrew Guthrie是孟菲斯大学城市和区域规划系的助理教授。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
What Makes a City “Smart” and Who Decides? From Vision to Reality in the USDOT Smart City Challenge
ABSTRACTThe concept of a “smart city” has gained currency in urban policy as a recognition of the potentially transformative role advanced information technology will play in city operations as the twenty-first century progresses. Who decides what makes a city smart and who is that smart city for are crucial questions for the urbanist literature to systematically address. Despite the concept’s recent popularity, “smart city” is a contested term and remains a chaotic dimension of urban theory. Theorizing the smart city in a US context must address a particular mix of built forms, public policies, and social conditions—all of which shape how transportation and other systems help constitute the city. To deepen understanding of the smart city concept in both theory and practice, this research explores the framing, construction, and contestation of the smart city concept through the U.S. Department of Transportation’s (USDOT’s) Smart City Challenge (SCC), launched in 2015 as a competitive grant program with the intent to provide a spark for incentivizing the development of smart infrastructure in mid-sized US cities. We compare the action plans of the seven finalist cities selected to create plans to implement their visions, including Columbus, Ohio, the eventual winner. We employ interpretivist content and discourse analysis of the applications and award decision, as well as of early implementation in Columbus, to explore shared meanings of recurring themes and key concepts, building a grounded theory of the smart city in the US context. The findings of the comparative analysis reveal further insights into prevailing challenges in smart city deployment, particularly for areas lacking inherent technology platforms.KEYWORDS: smart cityvision elements (VEs)U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT)Smart City Challenge (SCC)Columbus Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJae Teuk ChinJae Teuk Chin is an associate professor in the International School of Urban Sciences at the University of Seoul.Andrew GuthrieAndrew Guthrie is an assistant professor in the Department of City and Regional Planning at the University of Memphis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Urban Technology publishes articles that review and analyze developments in urban technologies as well as articles that study the history and the political, economic, environmental, social, esthetic, and ethical effects of those technologies. The goal of the journal is, through education and discussion, to maximize the positive and minimize the adverse effects of technology on cities. The journal"s mission is to open a conversation between specialists and non-specialists (or among practitioners of different specialities) and is designed for both scholars and a general audience whose businesses, occupations, professions, or studies require that they become aware of the effects of new technologies on urban environments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信