传统和另类资产类别的比较分析

Tejal Doshi
{"title":"传统和另类资产类别的比较分析","authors":"Tejal Doshi","doi":"10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research undertaken is a descriptive study with an emphasis on comparing various asset classes: traditional (equity shares, corporate bonds, government securities) and alternative (private equity, commodities). Based on historical data and prospects, various aspects such as past performance, rates of return, volatility, liquidity, and regulatory framework were analysed and concluded. It was found that alternative assets depict a higher performance potential than traditional assets, but are not as consistent as the latter. Within the traditional category, shareholding generated superior returns than debt instruments. Alternative assets also have higher volatility and associated risk, along with lower liquidity than traditional assets. Regulation is tighter for publicly traded assets than for privately traded. Both categories do not appear to show much correlation with each other.","PeriodicalId":500023,"journal":{"name":"International journal of social science and economic research","volume":"115 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE ASSET CLASSES\",\"authors\":\"Tejal Doshi\",\"doi\":\"10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The research undertaken is a descriptive study with an emphasis on comparing various asset classes: traditional (equity shares, corporate bonds, government securities) and alternative (private equity, commodities). Based on historical data and prospects, various aspects such as past performance, rates of return, volatility, liquidity, and regulatory framework were analysed and concluded. It was found that alternative assets depict a higher performance potential than traditional assets, but are not as consistent as the latter. Within the traditional category, shareholding generated superior returns than debt instruments. Alternative assets also have higher volatility and associated risk, along with lower liquidity than traditional assets. Regulation is tighter for publicly traded assets than for privately traded. Both categories do not appear to show much correlation with each other.\",\"PeriodicalId\":500023,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of social science and economic research\",\"volume\":\"115 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of social science and economic research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i07.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of social science and economic research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser.2023.v08i07.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF TRADITIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE ASSET CLASSES
The research undertaken is a descriptive study with an emphasis on comparing various asset classes: traditional (equity shares, corporate bonds, government securities) and alternative (private equity, commodities). Based on historical data and prospects, various aspects such as past performance, rates of return, volatility, liquidity, and regulatory framework were analysed and concluded. It was found that alternative assets depict a higher performance potential than traditional assets, but are not as consistent as the latter. Within the traditional category, shareholding generated superior returns than debt instruments. Alternative assets also have higher volatility and associated risk, along with lower liquidity than traditional assets. Regulation is tighter for publicly traded assets than for privately traded. Both categories do not appear to show much correlation with each other.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信