在拒绝OGTT的患者中,空腹或餐后血糖监测是否可以作为诊断妊娠糖尿病和预测其并发症的方法?

Gulchin Babayeva
{"title":"在拒绝OGTT的患者中,空腹或餐后血糖监测是否可以作为诊断妊娠糖尿病和预测其并发症的方法?","authors":"Gulchin Babayeva","doi":"10.14744/scie.2023.95777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common metabolic diseases in pregnancy. Negative news in the media has made the GDM test controversial among patients. We aimed to investigate the usability of fasting blood glucose (FG), HgA1c, and post-prandial 2nd-h blood glucose (PG) instead of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the diagnosis of GDM and predict its possible complications. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients admitted to a private hospital in Istanbul between December 2020 and July 2022. In our clinic, patients who refuse OGTT are routinely asked for FG and PG after a normal meal. We also evaluate the HgA1c value. Data of 374 patients were obtained and 150 patients were included in the study after exclusion criteria. Women aged 24–28 weeks who refused OGTT were considered the study group. Patients who accepted OGTT were diagnosed with diabetes before, and FG and PG results could not be reached and were excluded from the study. In addition, patients with a body mass index above 35 were not included in the study. Polyhydramnios and macrosomia, which are common diabetes complications, were evaluated during the follow-up of patients, and these conditions were associated with FG and PG. Results: Due to our results, it was determined that FG was weak and PG was moderately successful in estimating the emergence of abnormal fetal characteristics in pregnant women. When the threshold value of FG was taken as 94 mg/dL, the sensitivity was 43%, and the specificity was 8.8%. When the threshold value of post-prandial blood glucose was taken as 143.5 mg/dL, the sensitivity was 64%, and the specificity was 14% (p<0.05). The HgA1c values of the patients did not show a significant difference between the patients who were diagnosed with polyhydramnios and macrosomia and those who did not. Conclusion: The OGTT is still the most valuable test for the diagnosis of GDM. Women who refuse to do OGTT, especially PG, may be valuable in terms of GDM and its complications. For these patients, more study is needed. ABSTRACT","PeriodicalId":33982,"journal":{"name":"Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Fasting or Post-prandial Blood Glucose Monitoring be used as a Method in the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes and Predicting its Complications in Patients who Refuse OGTT?\",\"authors\":\"Gulchin Babayeva\",\"doi\":\"10.14744/scie.2023.95777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common metabolic diseases in pregnancy. Negative news in the media has made the GDM test controversial among patients. We aimed to investigate the usability of fasting blood glucose (FG), HgA1c, and post-prandial 2nd-h blood glucose (PG) instead of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the diagnosis of GDM and predict its possible complications. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients admitted to a private hospital in Istanbul between December 2020 and July 2022. In our clinic, patients who refuse OGTT are routinely asked for FG and PG after a normal meal. We also evaluate the HgA1c value. Data of 374 patients were obtained and 150 patients were included in the study after exclusion criteria. Women aged 24–28 weeks who refused OGTT were considered the study group. Patients who accepted OGTT were diagnosed with diabetes before, and FG and PG results could not be reached and were excluded from the study. In addition, patients with a body mass index above 35 were not included in the study. Polyhydramnios and macrosomia, which are common diabetes complications, were evaluated during the follow-up of patients, and these conditions were associated with FG and PG. Results: Due to our results, it was determined that FG was weak and PG was moderately successful in estimating the emergence of abnormal fetal characteristics in pregnant women. When the threshold value of FG was taken as 94 mg/dL, the sensitivity was 43%, and the specificity was 8.8%. When the threshold value of post-prandial blood glucose was taken as 143.5 mg/dL, the sensitivity was 64%, and the specificity was 14% (p<0.05). The HgA1c values of the patients did not show a significant difference between the patients who were diagnosed with polyhydramnios and macrosomia and those who did not. Conclusion: The OGTT is still the most valuable test for the diagnosis of GDM. Women who refuse to do OGTT, especially PG, may be valuable in terms of GDM and its complications. For these patients, more study is needed. ABSTRACT\",\"PeriodicalId\":33982,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14744/scie.2023.95777\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Clinics of Istanbul Eurasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/scie.2023.95777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Can Fasting or Post-prandial Blood Glucose Monitoring be used as a Method in the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes and Predicting its Complications in Patients who Refuse OGTT?
Objective: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is one of the most common metabolic diseases in pregnancy. Negative news in the media has made the GDM test controversial among patients. We aimed to investigate the usability of fasting blood glucose (FG), HgA1c, and post-prandial 2nd-h blood glucose (PG) instead of an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) in the diagnosis of GDM and predict its possible complications. Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted among patients admitted to a private hospital in Istanbul between December 2020 and July 2022. In our clinic, patients who refuse OGTT are routinely asked for FG and PG after a normal meal. We also evaluate the HgA1c value. Data of 374 patients were obtained and 150 patients were included in the study after exclusion criteria. Women aged 24–28 weeks who refused OGTT were considered the study group. Patients who accepted OGTT were diagnosed with diabetes before, and FG and PG results could not be reached and were excluded from the study. In addition, patients with a body mass index above 35 were not included in the study. Polyhydramnios and macrosomia, which are common diabetes complications, were evaluated during the follow-up of patients, and these conditions were associated with FG and PG. Results: Due to our results, it was determined that FG was weak and PG was moderately successful in estimating the emergence of abnormal fetal characteristics in pregnant women. When the threshold value of FG was taken as 94 mg/dL, the sensitivity was 43%, and the specificity was 8.8%. When the threshold value of post-prandial blood glucose was taken as 143.5 mg/dL, the sensitivity was 64%, and the specificity was 14% (p<0.05). The HgA1c values of the patients did not show a significant difference between the patients who were diagnosed with polyhydramnios and macrosomia and those who did not. Conclusion: The OGTT is still the most valuable test for the diagnosis of GDM. Women who refuse to do OGTT, especially PG, may be valuable in terms of GDM and its complications. For these patients, more study is needed. ABSTRACT
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信