作为方法的批判唯心主义恩斯特-卡西勒与符号形式哲学

IF 0.7 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Esther Oluffa Pedersen
{"title":"作为方法的批判唯心主义恩斯特-卡西勒与符号形式哲学","authors":"Esther Oluffa Pedersen","doi":"10.1111/ejop.12903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>To commemorate the centenary of Ernst Cassirer's <i>Philosophy of Symbolic Forms</i> this essay focuses on how Cassirer in the development of a distinctive philosophical method analyzed the newest development within philosophy and science. Discussing Einstein's theory of relativity and Russell's formal logic Cassirer found tools to expand the critique of reason into a critique of culture. The course of argumentation is as follows. At the outset Cassirer's outline of the idea of <i>The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms</i> in the 1920 book <i>Einstein's Theory of Relativity</i> is presented as a reaction to the increasing distance between theoretical physics and ordinary experience. <i>The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms</i> can be read as an answer to an inner methodological demand within critical idealism. I encircle this motif in Cassirer's comment that Plato's idealism, understood as the <i>dianoia</i> of thought, is reiterated in Kant's transcendental philosophy and Herman Cohen's reception of Kant. This leads to a discussion of how Cassirer breaks away from Cohen by the positive reception of Russell's symbolic logic. Finally, I present the theory of functional concepts developed by Cassirer (1910) in the book <i>Substance and Function</i> as a prerequisite for the conception of a plural but systematic philosophy of symbolic forms.</p>","PeriodicalId":46958,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":"31 4","pages":"1105-1114"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejop.12903","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Critical Idealism as Method: Ernst Cassirer and the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms\",\"authors\":\"Esther Oluffa Pedersen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejop.12903\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>To commemorate the centenary of Ernst Cassirer's <i>Philosophy of Symbolic Forms</i> this essay focuses on how Cassirer in the development of a distinctive philosophical method analyzed the newest development within philosophy and science. Discussing Einstein's theory of relativity and Russell's formal logic Cassirer found tools to expand the critique of reason into a critique of culture. The course of argumentation is as follows. At the outset Cassirer's outline of the idea of <i>The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms</i> in the 1920 book <i>Einstein's Theory of Relativity</i> is presented as a reaction to the increasing distance between theoretical physics and ordinary experience. <i>The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms</i> can be read as an answer to an inner methodological demand within critical idealism. I encircle this motif in Cassirer's comment that Plato's idealism, understood as the <i>dianoia</i> of thought, is reiterated in Kant's transcendental philosophy and Herman Cohen's reception of Kant. This leads to a discussion of how Cassirer breaks away from Cohen by the positive reception of Russell's symbolic logic. Finally, I present the theory of functional concepts developed by Cassirer (1910) in the book <i>Substance and Function</i> as a prerequisite for the conception of a plural but systematic philosophy of symbolic forms.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"31 4\",\"pages\":\"1105-1114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ejop.12903\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.12903\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.12903","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了纪念恩斯特·卡西尔的《符号形式哲学》诞生一百周年,本文着重探讨卡西尔如何以独特的哲学方法来分析哲学和科学的最新发展。通过讨论爱因斯坦的相对论和罗素的形式逻辑,卡西尔找到了将对理性的批判扩展到对文化的批判的工具。论证的过程如下。一开始,卡西尔在1920年出版的《爱因斯坦的相对论》一书中概述了符号形式哲学的思想,这是对理论物理学与日常经验之间日益增长的距离的一种反应。《象征形式哲学》可以被解读为对批判唯心主义内部方法论需求的回答。我在卡西尔的评论中围绕着这个主题,柏拉图的唯心主义,被理解为思想的癫狂,在康德的先验哲学和赫尔曼·科恩对康德的接受中得到了重申。这导致了卡西尔如何通过积极接受罗素的符号逻辑而脱离科恩的讨论。最后,我提出了卡西尔(1910)在《物质与功能》一书中提出的功能概念理论,作为多元但系统的符号形式哲学概念的先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Critical Idealism as Method: Ernst Cassirer and the Philosophy of Symbolic Forms

To commemorate the centenary of Ernst Cassirer's Philosophy of Symbolic Forms this essay focuses on how Cassirer in the development of a distinctive philosophical method analyzed the newest development within philosophy and science. Discussing Einstein's theory of relativity and Russell's formal logic Cassirer found tools to expand the critique of reason into a critique of culture. The course of argumentation is as follows. At the outset Cassirer's outline of the idea of The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms in the 1920 book Einstein's Theory of Relativity is presented as a reaction to the increasing distance between theoretical physics and ordinary experience. The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms can be read as an answer to an inner methodological demand within critical idealism. I encircle this motif in Cassirer's comment that Plato's idealism, understood as the dianoia of thought, is reiterated in Kant's transcendental philosophy and Herman Cohen's reception of Kant. This leads to a discussion of how Cassirer breaks away from Cohen by the positive reception of Russell's symbolic logic. Finally, I present the theory of functional concepts developed by Cassirer (1910) in the book Substance and Function as a prerequisite for the conception of a plural but systematic philosophy of symbolic forms.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: ''Founded by Mark Sacks in 1993, the European Journal of Philosophy has come to occupy a distinctive and highly valued place amongst the philosophical journals. The aim of EJP has been to bring together the best work from those working within the "analytic" and "continental" traditions, and to encourage connections between them, without diluting their respective priorities and concerns. This has enabled EJP to publish a wide range of material of the highest standard from philosophers across the world, reflecting the best thinking from a variety of philosophical perspectives, in a way that is accessible to all of them.''
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信