Fabio D'Ambrosio, Lavinia Heisenberg, Stefan Zentarra
{"title":"f(Q)$ f(\\mathbb {Q})$引力的哈密顿分析和Dirac-Bergmann算法在遥平行引力理论中的失效","authors":"Fabio D'Ambrosio, Lavinia Heisenberg, Stefan Zentarra","doi":"10.1002/prop.202300185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In recent years, <math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mi>f</mi>\n <mo>(</mo>\n <mi>Q</mi>\n <mo>)</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$f(\\mathbb {Q})$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> gravity has enjoyed considerable attention in the literature and important results have been obtained. However, the question of how many physical degrees of freedom the theory propagates—and how this number may depend on the form of the function <i>f</i>—has not been answered satisfactorily. In this article it is shown that a Hamiltonian analysis based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm—one of the standard methods to address this type of question—fails. The source of the failure is isolated and it is shown that other commonly considered teleparallel theories of gravity are affected by the same problem. Furthermore, it is pointed out that the number of degrees of freedom obtained in <i>Phys. Rev</i>. <b>D</b> 106 no. 4, (2022) by K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa, and T. Qui (namely eight), based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm, is wrong. Using a different approach, it is shown that the upper bound on the degrees of freedom is seven. Finally, a more promising strategy for settling this important question is proposed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55150,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Physik-Progress of Physics","volume":"71 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prop.202300185","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hamiltonian Analysis of \\n \\n \\n f\\n (\\n Q\\n )\\n \\n $f(\\\\mathbb {Q})$\\n Gravity and the Failure of the Dirac–Bergmann Algorithm for Teleparallel Theories of Gravity\",\"authors\":\"Fabio D'Ambrosio, Lavinia Heisenberg, Stefan Zentarra\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/prop.202300185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In recent years, <math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>f</mi>\\n <mo>(</mo>\\n <mi>Q</mi>\\n <mo>)</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$f(\\\\mathbb {Q})$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> gravity has enjoyed considerable attention in the literature and important results have been obtained. However, the question of how many physical degrees of freedom the theory propagates—and how this number may depend on the form of the function <i>f</i>—has not been answered satisfactorily. In this article it is shown that a Hamiltonian analysis based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm—one of the standard methods to address this type of question—fails. The source of the failure is isolated and it is shown that other commonly considered teleparallel theories of gravity are affected by the same problem. Furthermore, it is pointed out that the number of degrees of freedom obtained in <i>Phys. Rev</i>. <b>D</b> 106 no. 4, (2022) by K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa, and T. Qui (namely eight), based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm, is wrong. Using a different approach, it is shown that the upper bound on the degrees of freedom is seven. Finally, a more promising strategy for settling this important question is proposed.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55150,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fortschritte Der Physik-Progress of Physics\",\"volume\":\"71 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/prop.202300185\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fortschritte Der Physik-Progress of Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prop.202300185\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Physik-Progress of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/prop.202300185","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
近年来,f(Q)$ f(\mathbb {Q})$ gravity在文献中受到了相当大的关注,并取得了重要的成果。然而,这个理论传播了多少个物理自由度的问题——以及这个数字如何取决于函数f的形式——还没有得到令人满意的回答。本文表明,基于Dirac-Bergmann算法(解决这类问题的标准方法之一)的哈密顿分析是失败的。故障的来源是孤立的,并表明其他通常认为的遥平行引力理论也受到同样问题的影响。此外,还指出了物理中所得到的自由度的数目。D第106号修订K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa和T. Qui(即8)基于Dirac-Bergmann算法的4,(2022)是错误的。采用另一种方法,证明了自由度的上界为7。最后,提出了解决这一重要问题的更有希望的策略。
Hamiltonian Analysis of
f
(
Q
)
$f(\mathbb {Q})$
Gravity and the Failure of the Dirac–Bergmann Algorithm for Teleparallel Theories of Gravity
In recent years, gravity has enjoyed considerable attention in the literature and important results have been obtained. However, the question of how many physical degrees of freedom the theory propagates—and how this number may depend on the form of the function f—has not been answered satisfactorily. In this article it is shown that a Hamiltonian analysis based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm—one of the standard methods to address this type of question—fails. The source of the failure is isolated and it is shown that other commonly considered teleparallel theories of gravity are affected by the same problem. Furthermore, it is pointed out that the number of degrees of freedom obtained in Phys. Rev. D 106 no. 4, (2022) by K. Hu, T. Katsuragawa, and T. Qui (namely eight), based on the Dirac-Bergmann algorithm, is wrong. Using a different approach, it is shown that the upper bound on the degrees of freedom is seven. Finally, a more promising strategy for settling this important question is proposed.
期刊介绍:
The journal Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics is a pure online Journal (since 2013).
Fortschritte der Physik - Progress of Physics is devoted to the theoretical and experimental studies of fundamental constituents of matter and their interactions e. g. elementary particle physics, classical and quantum field theory, the theory of gravitation and cosmology, quantum information, thermodynamics and statistics, laser physics and nonlinear dynamics, including chaos and quantum chaos. Generally the papers are review articles with a detailed survey on relevant publications, but original papers of general interest are also published.