Anthony Levy, Gautier Defossez, Vincent Delwail, Stéphanie Guidez, Sammara Chaubard, Christopher Nunes Gomes, Laura Cailly, Valentin Letailleur, Antoine Machet, Xavier Leleu, Pierre Ingrand, Thomas Systchenko
{"title":"一线治疗前的前期治疗对DLBCL预后的影响:一项基于人群的注册研究","authors":"Anthony Levy, Gautier Defossez, Vincent Delwail, Stéphanie Guidez, Sammara Chaubard, Christopher Nunes Gomes, Laura Cailly, Valentin Letailleur, Antoine Machet, Xavier Leleu, Pierre Ingrand, Thomas Systchenko","doi":"10.1155/2023/1826112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Prephase treatment (PP) is recommended in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) to decrease therapy-related toxicities and to avoid tumour lysis syndrome. Data in the real world are limited, and no study has evaluated the impact on overall survival. We aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade III-IV toxicities during the first cycle according to PP. Methods and Materials. All DLBCL diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 and aged between 18 and 80 years were identified by the Poitou-Charentes General Cancer Registry (France). PP was defined as any treatment prior to first-line, excluding anthracycline and/or Rituximab. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to control characteristics at diagnosis, reduce bias, and approximate a randomized trial. Results. Three hundred and forty patients received first-line treatment in 17 hospital centers: 126 (37%) with prephase and 214 (63%) without prephase (NPP). After PSM, 97 patients remained in each group without significant difference in characteristics at diagnosis; matched PP patients had a 2-year OS of 71% (vs. 77%, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M1\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.32), a 2-year PFS of 61% (vs. 74%, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M2\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.12), and 26% grade III-IV toxicities (vs. 27%, <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M3\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.75). No tumour lysis syndrome was reported. PP nonsignificantly decreases grade III-IV toxicities for patients with high tumour load ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M4\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.82) or elderly patients ( <math xmlns=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\" id=\"M5\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.81). Conclusion. PP treatment does not affect survival nor does it reduce therapy-related toxicities even for patients with high tumour load or elderly patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PP.","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"53 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prognostic Impact of Prephase Treatment Prior to First-Line Treatment in DLBCL: A Population-Based Registry Study\",\"authors\":\"Anthony Levy, Gautier Defossez, Vincent Delwail, Stéphanie Guidez, Sammara Chaubard, Christopher Nunes Gomes, Laura Cailly, Valentin Letailleur, Antoine Machet, Xavier Leleu, Pierre Ingrand, Thomas Systchenko\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/1826112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Prephase treatment (PP) is recommended in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) to decrease therapy-related toxicities and to avoid tumour lysis syndrome. Data in the real world are limited, and no study has evaluated the impact on overall survival. We aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade III-IV toxicities during the first cycle according to PP. Methods and Materials. All DLBCL diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 and aged between 18 and 80 years were identified by the Poitou-Charentes General Cancer Registry (France). PP was defined as any treatment prior to first-line, excluding anthracycline and/or Rituximab. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to control characteristics at diagnosis, reduce bias, and approximate a randomized trial. Results. Three hundred and forty patients received first-line treatment in 17 hospital centers: 126 (37%) with prephase and 214 (63%) without prephase (NPP). After PSM, 97 patients remained in each group without significant difference in characteristics at diagnosis; matched PP patients had a 2-year OS of 71% (vs. 77%, <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M1\\\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.32), a 2-year PFS of 61% (vs. 74%, <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M2\\\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.12), and 26% grade III-IV toxicities (vs. 27%, <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M3\\\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.75). No tumour lysis syndrome was reported. PP nonsignificantly decreases grade III-IV toxicities for patients with high tumour load ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M4\\\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.82) or elderly patients ( <math xmlns=\\\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\\\" id=\\\"M5\\\"> <mi>P</mi> </math> = 0.81). Conclusion. PP treatment does not affect survival nor does it reduce therapy-related toxicities even for patients with high tumour load or elderly patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"53 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1826112\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/1826112","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。弥漫性大b细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)建议进行前期治疗(PP),以减少治疗相关的毒性并避免肿瘤溶解综合征。现实世界的数据是有限的,没有研究评估过对总体生存的影响。我们的目的是根据PP评估第一周期的总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)和III-IV级毒性。2014年至2017年间诊断的所有DLBCL,年龄在18岁至80岁之间,均由普瓦图-夏朗德癌症登记处(法国)确定。PP定义为一线治疗之前的任何治疗,不包括蒽环类药物和/或利妥昔单抗。我们采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来控制诊断时的特征,减少偏倚,并近似随机试验。结果。340名患者在17个医院中心接受了一线治疗:126名(37%)患者接受了前期治疗,214名(63%)患者没有接受前期治疗。经PSM治疗后,两组各有97例患者,诊断时特征无显著差异;匹配的PP患者的2年OS为71% (vs. 77%, P = 0.32), 2年PFS为61% (vs. 74%, P = 0.12), III-IV级毒性为26% (vs. 27%, P = 0.75)。未见肿瘤溶解综合征的报道。对于高肿瘤负荷患者(P = 0.82)或老年患者(P = 0.81), PP未显著降低III-IV级毒性。结论。即使对于高肿瘤负荷患者或老年患者,PP治疗也不会影响生存,也不会降低治疗相关的毒性。PP的有效性和安全性有待进一步的研究评价。
Prognostic Impact of Prephase Treatment Prior to First-Line Treatment in DLBCL: A Population-Based Registry Study
Introduction. Prephase treatment (PP) is recommended in diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) to decrease therapy-related toxicities and to avoid tumour lysis syndrome. Data in the real world are limited, and no study has evaluated the impact on overall survival. We aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and grade III-IV toxicities during the first cycle according to PP. Methods and Materials. All DLBCL diagnosed between 2014 and 2017 and aged between 18 and 80 years were identified by the Poitou-Charentes General Cancer Registry (France). PP was defined as any treatment prior to first-line, excluding anthracycline and/or Rituximab. We performed propensity score matching (PSM) to control characteristics at diagnosis, reduce bias, and approximate a randomized trial. Results. Three hundred and forty patients received first-line treatment in 17 hospital centers: 126 (37%) with prephase and 214 (63%) without prephase (NPP). After PSM, 97 patients remained in each group without significant difference in characteristics at diagnosis; matched PP patients had a 2-year OS of 71% (vs. 77%, = 0.32), a 2-year PFS of 61% (vs. 74%, = 0.12), and 26% grade III-IV toxicities (vs. 27%, = 0.75). No tumour lysis syndrome was reported. PP nonsignificantly decreases grade III-IV toxicities for patients with high tumour load ( = 0.82) or elderly patients ( = 0.81). Conclusion. PP treatment does not affect survival nor does it reduce therapy-related toxicities even for patients with high tumour load or elderly patients. Further studies are needed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PP.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of:
- Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients
- Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care
- Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients
- Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care
- Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members
- International perspectives on cancer care