衡量社会营销实践成功的两阶段分类法

IF 3.1 4区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS
M. Bilal Akbar, Nihar Amoncar, Erik Cateriano-Arévalo, Alison Lawson
{"title":"衡量社会营销实践成功的两阶段分类法","authors":"M. Bilal Akbar, Nihar Amoncar, Erik Cateriano-Arévalo, Alison Lawson","doi":"10.1108/jsocm-11-2022-0226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Given the lack of understanding of social marketing success in theory and practice, this study aims to investigate how social marketing experts conceptualize success. Design/methodology/approach In this qualitative study, the authors conducted an open-ended online questionnaire with 48 worldwide social marketing experts, most with more than 20 years of experience in the field. The authors analyzed data using topic modeling, a machine-learning method that groups responses/terms into cluster topics based on similarities. Keywords in each topic served to generate themes for discussion. Findings While behavior change is mentioned as paramount to conceptualizing success, participants prefer to use more tangible and less complex forms to define/measure success, such as campaign recall uptick. In addition, lack of funding was considered an important factor in measuring success. This study provides a two-stage taxonomy to better understand success in social marketing. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to conceptualize success in social marketing practice.","PeriodicalId":51732,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Marketing","volume":"110 5","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-stage taxonomy for measuring success in social marketing practice\",\"authors\":\"M. Bilal Akbar, Nihar Amoncar, Erik Cateriano-Arévalo, Alison Lawson\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jsocm-11-2022-0226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose Given the lack of understanding of social marketing success in theory and practice, this study aims to investigate how social marketing experts conceptualize success. Design/methodology/approach In this qualitative study, the authors conducted an open-ended online questionnaire with 48 worldwide social marketing experts, most with more than 20 years of experience in the field. The authors analyzed data using topic modeling, a machine-learning method that groups responses/terms into cluster topics based on similarities. Keywords in each topic served to generate themes for discussion. Findings While behavior change is mentioned as paramount to conceptualizing success, participants prefer to use more tangible and less complex forms to define/measure success, such as campaign recall uptick. In addition, lack of funding was considered an important factor in measuring success. This study provides a two-stage taxonomy to better understand success in social marketing. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to conceptualize success in social marketing practice.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Social Marketing\",\"volume\":\"110 5\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Social Marketing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-11-2022-0226\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jsocm-11-2022-0226","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于社会营销成功在理论和实践中缺乏理解,本研究旨在探讨社会营销专家如何概念化成功。在这项定性研究中,作者对48位全球社会营销专家进行了开放式在线问卷调查,其中大多数人在该领域拥有超过20年的经验。作者使用主题建模来分析数据,主题建模是一种机器学习方法,可以根据相似性将响应/术语分组到聚类主题中。每个题目中的关键词都是用来产生讨论主题的。虽然行为改变被认为是成功概念化的最重要因素,但参与者更喜欢使用更有形、更简单的形式来定义/衡量成功,比如活动回忆上升。此外,缺乏资金被认为是衡量成功的一个重要因素。这项研究提供了一个两阶段的分类,以更好地理解社会营销的成功。据作者所知,这项研究是最早将社会营销实践中的成功概念化的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two-stage taxonomy for measuring success in social marketing practice
Purpose Given the lack of understanding of social marketing success in theory and practice, this study aims to investigate how social marketing experts conceptualize success. Design/methodology/approach In this qualitative study, the authors conducted an open-ended online questionnaire with 48 worldwide social marketing experts, most with more than 20 years of experience in the field. The authors analyzed data using topic modeling, a machine-learning method that groups responses/terms into cluster topics based on similarities. Keywords in each topic served to generate themes for discussion. Findings While behavior change is mentioned as paramount to conceptualizing success, participants prefer to use more tangible and less complex forms to define/measure success, such as campaign recall uptick. In addition, lack of funding was considered an important factor in measuring success. This study provides a two-stage taxonomy to better understand success in social marketing. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this study is one of the first to conceptualize success in social marketing practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
29.20%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信