{"title":"随着时间的推移,多元化和教授“女性参与经济”课程","authors":"Janice Peterson","doi":"10.1504/ijpee.2023.133639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the USA, courses on 'women in the economy' (WIE) have provided an avenue for exploring the economic status of women and bringing a gender lens to the analysis and discussion of economic trends, outcomes, and public policies in the undergraduate economics curriculum. WIE courses are taught at universities and colleges with programs strongly rooted in neoclassical economics, as well as those that are more pluralistic, and consequently may reflect different approaches to both the study of economics and the economic status of women. While WIE courses are often viewed as 'filling the gender gaps' in traditional economics curricula, a pluralistic WIE course may also introduce new, alternative perspectives on traditional economic topics and analyses that are otherwise not discussed. This essay reflects on the experiences and lessons of teaching a WIE course over a long time span, encompassing significant policy debates and economic crises, in very different institutional settings, and filling different roles in the curriculum. The key lesson addressed in this paper is the value of taking a pluralistic approach, acknowledging the different ways in which pluralism can manifest to best address different circumstances.","PeriodicalId":52200,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pluralism and teaching a 'women in the economy' course over time\",\"authors\":\"Janice Peterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1504/ijpee.2023.133639\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the USA, courses on 'women in the economy' (WIE) have provided an avenue for exploring the economic status of women and bringing a gender lens to the analysis and discussion of economic trends, outcomes, and public policies in the undergraduate economics curriculum. WIE courses are taught at universities and colleges with programs strongly rooted in neoclassical economics, as well as those that are more pluralistic, and consequently may reflect different approaches to both the study of economics and the economic status of women. While WIE courses are often viewed as 'filling the gender gaps' in traditional economics curricula, a pluralistic WIE course may also introduce new, alternative perspectives on traditional economic topics and analyses that are otherwise not discussed. This essay reflects on the experiences and lessons of teaching a WIE course over a long time span, encompassing significant policy debates and economic crises, in very different institutional settings, and filling different roles in the curriculum. The key lesson addressed in this paper is the value of taking a pluralistic approach, acknowledging the different ways in which pluralism can manifest to best address different circumstances.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpee.2023.133639\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Pluralism and Economics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1504/ijpee.2023.133639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在美国,“经济中的女性”(women In the economy, WIE)课程为探索女性的经济地位提供了途径,并在本科经济学课程中引入了性别视角来分析和讨论经济趋势、结果和公共政策。WIE课程在大学和学院教授,这些课程强烈植根于新古典经济学,以及那些更加多元化的课程,因此可能反映出经济学研究和女性经济地位的不同方法。虽然工业大学课程通常被视为“填补传统经济学课程中的性别差距”,但多元化的工业大学课程也可能对传统经济主题和分析引入新的、替代的视角,否则这些主题和分析就不会被讨论。这篇文章反映了在很长一段时间内教授世界经济大学课程的经验和教训,包括在非常不同的制度背景下进行的重大政策辩论和经济危机,并在课程中扮演不同的角色。本文讨论的关键教训是采取多元化方法的价值,承认多元化可以以不同的方式表现出来,以最好地应对不同的情况。
Pluralism and teaching a 'women in the economy' course over time
In the USA, courses on 'women in the economy' (WIE) have provided an avenue for exploring the economic status of women and bringing a gender lens to the analysis and discussion of economic trends, outcomes, and public policies in the undergraduate economics curriculum. WIE courses are taught at universities and colleges with programs strongly rooted in neoclassical economics, as well as those that are more pluralistic, and consequently may reflect different approaches to both the study of economics and the economic status of women. While WIE courses are often viewed as 'filling the gender gaps' in traditional economics curricula, a pluralistic WIE course may also introduce new, alternative perspectives on traditional economic topics and analyses that are otherwise not discussed. This essay reflects on the experiences and lessons of teaching a WIE course over a long time span, encompassing significant policy debates and economic crises, in very different institutional settings, and filling different roles in the curriculum. The key lesson addressed in this paper is the value of taking a pluralistic approach, acknowledging the different ways in which pluralism can manifest to best address different circumstances.