主动学习与公平包容教学关系的集合论分析

IF 0.7 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Amy Been Bennett, Karina Uhing, Molly Williams, Nancy Kress
{"title":"主动学习与公平包容教学关系的集合论分析","authors":"Amy Been Bennett, Karina Uhing, Molly Williams, Nancy Kress","doi":"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAlthough research on active learning suggests strong connections to equitable and inclusive teaching, few studies have explored the relationship between the two concepts. In this qualitative study, we examined how 13 participants in an equity-focused workshop described the relationship between active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching. We used set theory as an analytic tool to categorise their descriptions. We found that all participants saw active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching as related. The two relationships that were most strongly supported by participants’ statements were that active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching are related yet independent sets, or that equitable and inclusive teaching is a subset of active learning. We discuss implications of these findings and pose questions for further exploration.KEYWORDS: Active learningequitable and inclusive teachingset theoryundergraduate mathematics AcknowledgmentsData were collected through an NSF-funded project (#1624639, #1624643 - SEMINAL). We would like to thank SEMINAL for designing the larger project from which these data were collected. All conclusions and opinions in this paper are from the authors and do not represent the opinions of the National Science Foundation.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Science Foundation [grant number 1624639, 1624643].","PeriodicalId":14026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A set theory analysis of the relationship between active learning and equitable and inclusive teaching\",\"authors\":\"Amy Been Bennett, Karina Uhing, Molly Williams, Nancy Kress\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractAlthough research on active learning suggests strong connections to equitable and inclusive teaching, few studies have explored the relationship between the two concepts. In this qualitative study, we examined how 13 participants in an equity-focused workshop described the relationship between active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching. We used set theory as an analytic tool to categorise their descriptions. We found that all participants saw active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching as related. The two relationships that were most strongly supported by participants’ statements were that active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching are related yet independent sets, or that equitable and inclusive teaching is a subset of active learning. We discuss implications of these findings and pose questions for further exploration.KEYWORDS: Active learningequitable and inclusive teachingset theoryundergraduate mathematics AcknowledgmentsData were collected through an NSF-funded project (#1624639, #1624643 - SEMINAL). We would like to thank SEMINAL for designing the larger project from which these data were collected. All conclusions and opinions in this paper are from the authors and do not represent the opinions of the National Science Foundation.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Science Foundation [grant number 1624639, 1624643].\",\"PeriodicalId\":14026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然研究表明主动学习与公平和包容性教学有很强的联系,但很少有研究探讨这两个概念之间的关系。在这项定性研究中,我们调查了13名参与者在一个以公平为重点的研讨会上如何描述主动学习与公平和包容教学之间的关系。我们使用集合论作为分析工具对它们的描述进行分类。我们发现所有的参与者都认为主动学习和公平包容的教学是相关的。参与者的陈述最强烈支持的两种关系是:主动学习和公平包容的教学是相互关联但又独立的集合,或者公平包容的教学是主动学习的一个子集。我们讨论了这些发现的含义,并提出了进一步探索的问题。关键词:主动学习,公平和包容的教学,集合理论,本科数学致谢数据是通过nsf资助的项目(#1624639,#1624643 -开创性)收集的。我们要感谢开创性设计的更大的项目,从这些数据收集。本文中的所有结论和观点均来自作者,不代表美国国家科学基金会的观点。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。本研究由美国国家科学基金资助[批准号:1624639,1624643]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A set theory analysis of the relationship between active learning and equitable and inclusive teaching
AbstractAlthough research on active learning suggests strong connections to equitable and inclusive teaching, few studies have explored the relationship between the two concepts. In this qualitative study, we examined how 13 participants in an equity-focused workshop described the relationship between active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching. We used set theory as an analytic tool to categorise their descriptions. We found that all participants saw active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching as related. The two relationships that were most strongly supported by participants’ statements were that active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching are related yet independent sets, or that equitable and inclusive teaching is a subset of active learning. We discuss implications of these findings and pose questions for further exploration.KEYWORDS: Active learningequitable and inclusive teachingset theoryundergraduate mathematics AcknowledgmentsData were collected through an NSF-funded project (#1624639, #1624643 - SEMINAL). We would like to thank SEMINAL for designing the larger project from which these data were collected. All conclusions and opinions in this paper are from the authors and do not represent the opinions of the National Science Foundation.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Science Foundation [grant number 1624639, 1624643].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
11.10%
发文量
123
期刊介绍: Mathematics is pervading every study and technique in our modern world, bringing ever more sharply into focus the responsibilities laid upon those whose task it is to teach it. Most prominent among these is the difficulty of presenting an interdisciplinary approach so that one professional group may benefit from the experience of others. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology provides a medium by which a wide range of experience in mathematical education can be presented, assimilated and eventually adapted to everyday needs in schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, industry and commerce. Contributions will be welcomed from lecturers, teachers and users of mathematics at all levels on the contents of syllabuses and methods of presentation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信