Amy Been Bennett, Karina Uhing, Molly Williams, Nancy Kress
{"title":"主动学习与公平包容教学关系的集合论分析","authors":"Amy Been Bennett, Karina Uhing, Molly Williams, Nancy Kress","doi":"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAlthough research on active learning suggests strong connections to equitable and inclusive teaching, few studies have explored the relationship between the two concepts. In this qualitative study, we examined how 13 participants in an equity-focused workshop described the relationship between active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching. We used set theory as an analytic tool to categorise their descriptions. We found that all participants saw active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching as related. The two relationships that were most strongly supported by participants’ statements were that active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching are related yet independent sets, or that equitable and inclusive teaching is a subset of active learning. We discuss implications of these findings and pose questions for further exploration.KEYWORDS: Active learningequitable and inclusive teachingset theoryundergraduate mathematics AcknowledgmentsData were collected through an NSF-funded project (#1624639, #1624643 - SEMINAL). We would like to thank SEMINAL for designing the larger project from which these data were collected. All conclusions and opinions in this paper are from the authors and do not represent the opinions of the National Science Foundation.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Science Foundation [grant number 1624639, 1624643].","PeriodicalId":14026,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A set theory analysis of the relationship between active learning and equitable and inclusive teaching\",\"authors\":\"Amy Been Bennett, Karina Uhing, Molly Williams, Nancy Kress\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255183\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AbstractAlthough research on active learning suggests strong connections to equitable and inclusive teaching, few studies have explored the relationship between the two concepts. In this qualitative study, we examined how 13 participants in an equity-focused workshop described the relationship between active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching. We used set theory as an analytic tool to categorise their descriptions. We found that all participants saw active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching as related. The two relationships that were most strongly supported by participants’ statements were that active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching are related yet independent sets, or that equitable and inclusive teaching is a subset of active learning. We discuss implications of these findings and pose questions for further exploration.KEYWORDS: Active learningequitable and inclusive teachingset theoryundergraduate mathematics AcknowledgmentsData were collected through an NSF-funded project (#1624639, #1624643 - SEMINAL). We would like to thank SEMINAL for designing the larger project from which these data were collected. All conclusions and opinions in this paper are from the authors and do not represent the opinions of the National Science Foundation.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Science Foundation [grant number 1624639, 1624643].\",\"PeriodicalId\":14026,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739x.2023.2255183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A set theory analysis of the relationship between active learning and equitable and inclusive teaching
AbstractAlthough research on active learning suggests strong connections to equitable and inclusive teaching, few studies have explored the relationship between the two concepts. In this qualitative study, we examined how 13 participants in an equity-focused workshop described the relationship between active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching. We used set theory as an analytic tool to categorise their descriptions. We found that all participants saw active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching as related. The two relationships that were most strongly supported by participants’ statements were that active learning, and equitable and inclusive teaching are related yet independent sets, or that equitable and inclusive teaching is a subset of active learning. We discuss implications of these findings and pose questions for further exploration.KEYWORDS: Active learningequitable and inclusive teachingset theoryundergraduate mathematics AcknowledgmentsData were collected through an NSF-funded project (#1624639, #1624643 - SEMINAL). We would like to thank SEMINAL for designing the larger project from which these data were collected. All conclusions and opinions in this paper are from the authors and do not represent the opinions of the National Science Foundation.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by National Science Foundation [grant number 1624639, 1624643].
期刊介绍:
Mathematics is pervading every study and technique in our modern world, bringing ever more sharply into focus the responsibilities laid upon those whose task it is to teach it. Most prominent among these is the difficulty of presenting an interdisciplinary approach so that one professional group may benefit from the experience of others. The International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology provides a medium by which a wide range of experience in mathematical education can be presented, assimilated and eventually adapted to everyday needs in schools, colleges, polytechnics, universities, industry and commerce. Contributions will be welcomed from lecturers, teachers and users of mathematics at all levels on the contents of syllabuses and methods of presentation.