Rui Wang, Hexin Liu, Bruce L. Kutter, Jian-Min Zhang
{"title":"离心试验土-容器摩擦对可液化地基板桩抗震响应的影响:数值模拟的启示","authors":"Rui Wang, Hexin Liu, Bruce L. Kutter, Jian-Min Zhang","doi":"10.1061/jggefk.gteng-11064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As part of the LEAP (Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Projects), many centrifuge model tests on a sheet pile retaining wall were conducted at six different centrifuge facilities around the world. Each centrifuge facility used containers of different W/H (width of container/height of wall) ratios to model the same plane strain prototype retaining wall. Predictions of the centrifuge tests that neglected wall friction, assumed plane strain conditions, and used the CycLiq constitutive model, exhibit reasonable general agreement with tests in terms of liquefaction response. However, an overprediction of the median response of sheet pile wall displacement was observed. The study presented in this paper was motivated by a concern that friction on the side walls might be biasing results from model containers with different W/H. A numerical simulation parametric study using FLAC3D is presented to illustrate the potential effects of interface friction and container geometry on the LEAP retaining wall test results. The results show that incorporation of appropriate container geometry and soil-container friction can reduce the error between simulated and experimental sheet pile wall displacements. Soil-container friction is also shown to affect the total earth pressure and especially its distribution on the sheet pile wall, causing the actual tests to deviate from the intended plane strain conditions. For the assessed liquefaction related cases, soil-container friction has the additional effect of significantly restricting the local development of excess pore pressure and subsequent soil deformation, further contributing to its influence on the centrifuge tests. The parametric study indicates that an interface friction angle of 17.6° and W/H>1, 2, and 3 reduced horizontal wall displacements by 50%, 20%, and 10% respectively, compared to simulations neglecting wall friction. Use of containers with large W/H is therefore recommended for future centrifuge experiments.","PeriodicalId":54819,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of Centrifuge Test Soil-Container Friction on Seismic Sheet-Pile Wall Response in Liquefiable Deposit: Insights from Numerical Simulations\",\"authors\":\"Rui Wang, Hexin Liu, Bruce L. Kutter, Jian-Min Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1061/jggefk.gteng-11064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As part of the LEAP (Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Projects), many centrifuge model tests on a sheet pile retaining wall were conducted at six different centrifuge facilities around the world. Each centrifuge facility used containers of different W/H (width of container/height of wall) ratios to model the same plane strain prototype retaining wall. Predictions of the centrifuge tests that neglected wall friction, assumed plane strain conditions, and used the CycLiq constitutive model, exhibit reasonable general agreement with tests in terms of liquefaction response. However, an overprediction of the median response of sheet pile wall displacement was observed. The study presented in this paper was motivated by a concern that friction on the side walls might be biasing results from model containers with different W/H. A numerical simulation parametric study using FLAC3D is presented to illustrate the potential effects of interface friction and container geometry on the LEAP retaining wall test results. The results show that incorporation of appropriate container geometry and soil-container friction can reduce the error between simulated and experimental sheet pile wall displacements. Soil-container friction is also shown to affect the total earth pressure and especially its distribution on the sheet pile wall, causing the actual tests to deviate from the intended plane strain conditions. For the assessed liquefaction related cases, soil-container friction has the additional effect of significantly restricting the local development of excess pore pressure and subsequent soil deformation, further contributing to its influence on the centrifuge tests. The parametric study indicates that an interface friction angle of 17.6° and W/H>1, 2, and 3 reduced horizontal wall displacements by 50%, 20%, and 10% respectively, compared to simulations neglecting wall friction. Use of containers with large W/H is therefore recommended for future centrifuge experiments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1061/jggefk.gteng-11064\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1061/jggefk.gteng-11064","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of Centrifuge Test Soil-Container Friction on Seismic Sheet-Pile Wall Response in Liquefiable Deposit: Insights from Numerical Simulations
As part of the LEAP (Liquefaction Experiments and Analysis Projects), many centrifuge model tests on a sheet pile retaining wall were conducted at six different centrifuge facilities around the world. Each centrifuge facility used containers of different W/H (width of container/height of wall) ratios to model the same plane strain prototype retaining wall. Predictions of the centrifuge tests that neglected wall friction, assumed plane strain conditions, and used the CycLiq constitutive model, exhibit reasonable general agreement with tests in terms of liquefaction response. However, an overprediction of the median response of sheet pile wall displacement was observed. The study presented in this paper was motivated by a concern that friction on the side walls might be biasing results from model containers with different W/H. A numerical simulation parametric study using FLAC3D is presented to illustrate the potential effects of interface friction and container geometry on the LEAP retaining wall test results. The results show that incorporation of appropriate container geometry and soil-container friction can reduce the error between simulated and experimental sheet pile wall displacements. Soil-container friction is also shown to affect the total earth pressure and especially its distribution on the sheet pile wall, causing the actual tests to deviate from the intended plane strain conditions. For the assessed liquefaction related cases, soil-container friction has the additional effect of significantly restricting the local development of excess pore pressure and subsequent soil deformation, further contributing to its influence on the centrifuge tests. The parametric study indicates that an interface friction angle of 17.6° and W/H>1, 2, and 3 reduced horizontal wall displacements by 50%, 20%, and 10% respectively, compared to simulations neglecting wall friction. Use of containers with large W/H is therefore recommended for future centrifuge experiments.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering covers the broad area of practice known as geotechnical engineering. Papers are welcomed on topics such as foundations, retaining structures, soil dynamics, engineering behavior of soil and rock, site characterization, slope stability, dams, rock engineering, earthquake engineering, environmental geotechnics, geosynthetics, computer modeling, groundwater monitoring and restoration, and coastal and geotechnical ocean engineering. Authors are also encouraged to submit papers on new and emerging topics within the general discipline of geotechnical engineering. Theoretical papers are welcomed, but there should be a clear and significant potential for practical application of the theory. Practice-oriented papers and case studies are particularly welcomed and encouraged.