美国劳动法改革够了吗?关于“工人权力的清白”的对话

Q2 Arts and Humanities

Labor Studies Journal Pub Date : 2023-10-19 DOI:10.1177/0160449x231201252

Emily E. LB. Twarog

{"title":"美国劳动法改革够了吗?关于“工人权力的清白”的对话","authors":"Emily E. LB. Twarog","doi":"10.1177/0160449x231201252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this roundtable, labor studies scholars examine the viability of the Clean Slate for Worker Power project. Engaging themes such as labor law, immigrant workers, and organizing strategies, the contributors debate the limits of U.S. labor law, the tendency of scholars to silo our work and our research without engaging an intersectional approach, and the practical realities that impact the U.S.' low rates of unionization.","PeriodicalId":35267,"journal":{"name":"Labor Studies Journal","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is US Labor Law Reform Enough? A Conversation About the “Clean Slate for Worker Power”\",\"authors\":\"Emily E. LB. Twarog\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0160449x231201252\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this roundtable, labor studies scholars examine the viability of the Clean Slate for Worker Power project. Engaging themes such as labor law, immigrant workers, and organizing strategies, the contributors debate the limits of U.S. labor law, the tendency of scholars to silo our work and our research without engaging an intersectional approach, and the practical realities that impact the U.S.' low rates of unionization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35267,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labor Studies Journal\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labor Studies Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x231201252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labor Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0160449x231201252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这次圆桌会议上，劳工研究学者考察了工人权力项目的可行性。作者围绕劳动法、移民工人和组织策略等主题，讨论了美国劳动法的局限性，学者们在不采用交叉方法的情况下将我们的工作和研究孤立起来的趋势，以及影响美国的实际现实工会化率低。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Is US Labor Law Reform Enough? A Conversation About the “Clean Slate for Worker Power”

In this roundtable, labor studies scholars examine the viability of the Clean Slate for Worker Power project. Engaging themes such as labor law, immigrant workers, and organizing strategies, the contributors debate the limits of U.S. labor law, the tendency of scholars to silo our work and our research without engaging an intersectional approach, and the practical realities that impact the U.S.' low rates of unionization.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Labor Studies Journal Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Labor Studies Journal is the official journal of the United Association for Labor Education and is a multi-disciplinary journal publishing research on work, workers, labor organizations, and labor studies and worker education in the US and internationally. The Journal is interested in manuscripts using a diversity of research methods, both qualitative and quantitative, directed at a general audience including union, university, and community based labor educators, labor activists and scholars from across the social sciences and humanities. As a multi-disciplinary journal, manuscripts should be directed at a general audience, and care should be taken to make methods, especially highly quantitative ones, accessible to a general reader.