结合内容分析和层次分析法对可持续智慧城市指标进行排名

IF 7 Q1 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
Karim Gazzeh
{"title":"结合内容分析和层次分析法对可持续智慧城市指标进行排名","authors":"Karim Gazzeh","doi":"10.3390/smartcities6050129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sustainable Smart Cities have a significant potential to ensure equal access to public services, achieve sustainability and governance transparency, improve livability, and anticipate and mitigate increasingly changing threats. This study aims at prioritizing a core set of Sustainable Smart City (SSC) indicators using a combined methodology: (a) Content Analysis and (b) Analytic Hierarchy Process. The study’s contribution is that it successfully developed a more robust ranking of the above-mentioned set of indicators by combining AHP and co-occurrence analyses. The final combined ranking is intended to serve as a Decision Support Tool to streamline the decision-making process and help decision-makers prioritize dimensions to measure, achieve, or monitor actions when they cannot be undertaken simultaneously in contexts of economic recessions, financial constraints, and resource mobilization challenges. The findings draw attention to the need for considering the concept of SSCs through the prism of interconnecting the various current technology-driven “smart silos” under an inclusive umbrella that focuses on the combinations and connectedness to achieve a systemic approach to sustainability and smartness that none of those single areas can achieve in isolation. The results also revealed an interesting paradox, which relegated the Technology and ICT dimension to the bottom of the ranking, contrary to the widespread consensus and opinion, opening an opportunity for discussion among peers.","PeriodicalId":34482,"journal":{"name":"Smart Cities","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ranking Sustainable Smart City Indicators Using Combined Content Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process Techniques\",\"authors\":\"Karim Gazzeh\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/smartcities6050129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Sustainable Smart Cities have a significant potential to ensure equal access to public services, achieve sustainability and governance transparency, improve livability, and anticipate and mitigate increasingly changing threats. This study aims at prioritizing a core set of Sustainable Smart City (SSC) indicators using a combined methodology: (a) Content Analysis and (b) Analytic Hierarchy Process. The study’s contribution is that it successfully developed a more robust ranking of the above-mentioned set of indicators by combining AHP and co-occurrence analyses. The final combined ranking is intended to serve as a Decision Support Tool to streamline the decision-making process and help decision-makers prioritize dimensions to measure, achieve, or monitor actions when they cannot be undertaken simultaneously in contexts of economic recessions, financial constraints, and resource mobilization challenges. The findings draw attention to the need for considering the concept of SSCs through the prism of interconnecting the various current technology-driven “smart silos” under an inclusive umbrella that focuses on the combinations and connectedness to achieve a systemic approach to sustainability and smartness that none of those single areas can achieve in isolation. The results also revealed an interesting paradox, which relegated the Technology and ICT dimension to the bottom of the ranking, contrary to the widespread consensus and opinion, opening an opportunity for discussion among peers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34482,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Smart Cities\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Smart Cities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6050129\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Smart Cities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities6050129","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可持续智慧城市在确保平等获得公共服务、实现可持续性和治理透明度、提高宜居性以及预测和缓解日益变化的威胁方面具有巨大潜力。本研究旨在使用综合方法(a)内容分析(Content Analysis)和(b)层次分析法(Analytic Hierarchy Process)确定可持续智慧城市(SSC)核心指标的优先级。本研究的贡献在于,它成功地将AHP和共现分析相结合,对上述指标集进行了更稳健的排名。最终的综合排名旨在作为一种决策支持工具,以简化决策过程,并帮助决策者优先考虑衡量、实现或监测行动的维度,当这些行动无法在经济衰退、财政限制和资源调动挑战的背景下同时进行时。调查结果提请注意,有必要通过将当前各种技术驱动的“智能孤岛”相互连接的棱镜来考虑可持续发展和智能的概念,该框架侧重于组合和连通性,以实现可持续性和智能的系统方法,而这些单一领域都无法单独实现。调查结果还揭示了一个有趣的悖论:与普遍的共识和意见相反,技术和信息通信技术维度被降到了排名的末尾,这为同行之间的讨论提供了机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ranking Sustainable Smart City Indicators Using Combined Content Analysis and Analytical Hierarchy Process Techniques
Sustainable Smart Cities have a significant potential to ensure equal access to public services, achieve sustainability and governance transparency, improve livability, and anticipate and mitigate increasingly changing threats. This study aims at prioritizing a core set of Sustainable Smart City (SSC) indicators using a combined methodology: (a) Content Analysis and (b) Analytic Hierarchy Process. The study’s contribution is that it successfully developed a more robust ranking of the above-mentioned set of indicators by combining AHP and co-occurrence analyses. The final combined ranking is intended to serve as a Decision Support Tool to streamline the decision-making process and help decision-makers prioritize dimensions to measure, achieve, or monitor actions when they cannot be undertaken simultaneously in contexts of economic recessions, financial constraints, and resource mobilization challenges. The findings draw attention to the need for considering the concept of SSCs through the prism of interconnecting the various current technology-driven “smart silos” under an inclusive umbrella that focuses on the combinations and connectedness to achieve a systemic approach to sustainability and smartness that none of those single areas can achieve in isolation. The results also revealed an interesting paradox, which relegated the Technology and ICT dimension to the bottom of the ranking, contrary to the widespread consensus and opinion, opening an opportunity for discussion among peers.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Smart Cities
Smart Cities Multiple-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
0
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: Smart Cities (ISSN 2624-6511) provides an advanced forum for the dissemination of information on the science and technology of smart cities, publishing reviews, regular research papers (articles) and communications in all areas of research concerning smart cities. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible, with no restriction on the maximum length of the papers published so that all experimental results can be reproduced.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信