热带自然保护区能否提供和保护文化生态系统服务?以中国西双版纳为例

Peng Liu, Wenwen Li, Qiuping Li, Xianming Guo, Bin Wang, Ludan Zhang, Qingzhong Shen, Ranfei Fu, Junyu Peng, Zhiyun Deng, Li Zhang
{"title":"热带自然保护区能否提供和保护文化生态系统服务?以中国西双版纳为例","authors":"Peng Liu,&nbsp;Wenwen Li,&nbsp;Qiuping Li,&nbsp;Xianming Guo,&nbsp;Bin Wang,&nbsp;Ludan Zhang,&nbsp;Qingzhong Shen,&nbsp;Ranfei Fu,&nbsp;Junyu Peng,&nbsp;Zhiyun Deng,&nbsp;Li Zhang","doi":"10.1002/inc3.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Cultural ecosystem services (CES) play a pivotal role in local natural conservation and management; however, they frequently remain overlooked by policymakers due to challenges in their definition and quantification. These services are particularly relevant to Asia's indigenous populations. Shangyong and Mengla, two tropical forest reserves in the Xishuangbanna region of Yunnan province, China, were selected for an in-depth study of CES in this area. Through village interviews and questionnaire surveys, the varieties of CES and their significance were identified and catalogued. Subsequently, the distributions of different CES types were mapped and modelled based on environmental drivers and hotspots. A conservation priority indicator was then formulated to identify the most critical CES necessitating conservation, as these are susceptible to human disturbances in the absence of protected nature reserves. Our findings indicated that the most commonly recognised CES included wildlife, leisure and recreational, folk and custom, and sense of place and identity. Benefits derived from leisure and recreational, and wildlife CES were predominantly safeguarded by nature reserves. In contrast, folk and custom CES and spiritual and religious CES were less reliant on these reserves due to intrinsic community-based protection. Consequently, while the two tropical forest reserves in Xishuangbanna offer a range of CES, there is a need for differentiated management strategies to foster local support for conservation management decision-making. The inherent conservation initiatives for spiritual and religious CES and folk and custom CES should be leveraged by incorporating or co-managing these sacred sites within our protected area system. Conversely, CES with a higher conservation priority index, such as leisure and recreational CES and wildlife CES, require government-led conservation to safeguard the cultural well-being of local communities. In conclusion, incorporating CES into nature reserve management strategies is crucial across various conservation contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":100680,"journal":{"name":"Integrative Conservation","volume":"2 3","pages":"119-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/inc3.27","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can tropical nature reserves provide and protect cultural ecosystem services? A case study in Xishuangbanna, China\\n 热带自然保护区能否提供和保护生态系统文化服务?来自中国西双版纳的案例研究\",\"authors\":\"Peng Liu,&nbsp;Wenwen Li,&nbsp;Qiuping Li,&nbsp;Xianming Guo,&nbsp;Bin Wang,&nbsp;Ludan Zhang,&nbsp;Qingzhong Shen,&nbsp;Ranfei Fu,&nbsp;Junyu Peng,&nbsp;Zhiyun Deng,&nbsp;Li Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/inc3.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Cultural ecosystem services (CES) play a pivotal role in local natural conservation and management; however, they frequently remain overlooked by policymakers due to challenges in their definition and quantification. These services are particularly relevant to Asia's indigenous populations. Shangyong and Mengla, two tropical forest reserves in the Xishuangbanna region of Yunnan province, China, were selected for an in-depth study of CES in this area. Through village interviews and questionnaire surveys, the varieties of CES and their significance were identified and catalogued. Subsequently, the distributions of different CES types were mapped and modelled based on environmental drivers and hotspots. A conservation priority indicator was then formulated to identify the most critical CES necessitating conservation, as these are susceptible to human disturbances in the absence of protected nature reserves. Our findings indicated that the most commonly recognised CES included wildlife, leisure and recreational, folk and custom, and sense of place and identity. Benefits derived from leisure and recreational, and wildlife CES were predominantly safeguarded by nature reserves. In contrast, folk and custom CES and spiritual and religious CES were less reliant on these reserves due to intrinsic community-based protection. Consequently, while the two tropical forest reserves in Xishuangbanna offer a range of CES, there is a need for differentiated management strategies to foster local support for conservation management decision-making. The inherent conservation initiatives for spiritual and religious CES and folk and custom CES should be leveraged by incorporating or co-managing these sacred sites within our protected area system. Conversely, CES with a higher conservation priority index, such as leisure and recreational CES and wildlife CES, require government-led conservation to safeguard the cultural well-being of local communities. In conclusion, incorporating CES into nature reserve management strategies is crucial across various conservation contexts.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100680,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Integrative Conservation\",\"volume\":\"2 3\",\"pages\":\"119-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/inc3.27\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Integrative Conservation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inc3.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Integrative Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/inc3.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文化生态系统服务在地方自然保护与管理中具有重要作用;然而,由于其定义和量化方面的挑战,它们经常被政策制定者所忽视。这些服务与亚洲土著人口特别相关。以云南省西双版纳地区的上永和勐腊两个热带森林保护区为研究对象,对该地区的生态系统进行了深入的研究。通过村庄访谈和问卷调查,对消费消费的种类及其意义进行了识别和分类。在此基础上,基于环境驱动因素和热点对不同类型CES的分布进行了映射和建模。然后制定了一个保护优先指标,以确定需要保护的最关键的生态系统,因为在没有受保护的自然保护区的情况下,这些生态系统容易受到人为干扰。我们的研究结果表明,最常见的消费体验包括野生动物、休闲娱乐、民俗以及地方感和身份。休闲娱乐和野生动物消费的收益主要由自然保护区保护。相比之下,由于内在的基于社区的保护,民俗消费和精神和宗教消费对这些储备的依赖程度较低。因此,虽然西双版纳的两个热带森林保护区提供了一系列的生态环境保护,但需要采取差异化的管理策略,以促进当地对保护管理决策的支持。我们应该通过将这些神圣的地点纳入或共同管理我们的保护区系统,来利用对精神和宗教消费场所以及民间和习俗消费场所的固有保护倡议。相反,具有较高保护优先指数的消费环境,如休闲娱乐消费环境和野生动物消费环境,则需要政府主导的保护,以保护当地社区的文化福祉。综上所述,将生态环境保护纳入自然保护区管理战略在各种保护环境中至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Can tropical nature reserves provide and protect cultural ecosystem services? A case study in Xishuangbanna, China
      热带自然保护区能否提供和保护生态系统文化服务?来自中国西双版纳的案例研究

Can tropical nature reserves provide and protect cultural ecosystem services? A case study in Xishuangbanna, China 热带自然保护区能否提供和保护生态系统文化服务?来自中国西双版纳的案例研究

Cultural ecosystem services (CES) play a pivotal role in local natural conservation and management; however, they frequently remain overlooked by policymakers due to challenges in their definition and quantification. These services are particularly relevant to Asia's indigenous populations. Shangyong and Mengla, two tropical forest reserves in the Xishuangbanna region of Yunnan province, China, were selected for an in-depth study of CES in this area. Through village interviews and questionnaire surveys, the varieties of CES and their significance were identified and catalogued. Subsequently, the distributions of different CES types were mapped and modelled based on environmental drivers and hotspots. A conservation priority indicator was then formulated to identify the most critical CES necessitating conservation, as these are susceptible to human disturbances in the absence of protected nature reserves. Our findings indicated that the most commonly recognised CES included wildlife, leisure and recreational, folk and custom, and sense of place and identity. Benefits derived from leisure and recreational, and wildlife CES were predominantly safeguarded by nature reserves. In contrast, folk and custom CES and spiritual and religious CES were less reliant on these reserves due to intrinsic community-based protection. Consequently, while the two tropical forest reserves in Xishuangbanna offer a range of CES, there is a need for differentiated management strategies to foster local support for conservation management decision-making. The inherent conservation initiatives for spiritual and religious CES and folk and custom CES should be leveraged by incorporating or co-managing these sacred sites within our protected area system. Conversely, CES with a higher conservation priority index, such as leisure and recreational CES and wildlife CES, require government-led conservation to safeguard the cultural well-being of local communities. In conclusion, incorporating CES into nature reserve management strategies is crucial across various conservation contexts.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信