The relationship between forest structure and naturalness in the Finnish national forest inventory

Abstract There is considerable interest in identifying and locating natural forests as accurately as possible, because they are deemed essential in preventing biodiversity loss. In the boreal region, natural forests contain a substantial amount of dead wood and exhibit considerable variation in tree age, size, and species composition. However, it is difficult to define natural forests in a quantitative manner. This is an issue, for example, in the Finnish national forest inventory. If naturalness could be related to the metrics derived from tree measurements, it would be easier to locate natural forests based on the inventory data. In this study, we investigated the value of metrics computed from tree locations and tree sizes for the characterization of a key aspect of naturalness, namely, structural naturalness as defined in the Finnish national forest inventory. We used L-moments, Gini coefficient, Lorenz asymmetry, and interquartile range to quantify the variations in tree size at the plot level. We summarized the spatial pattern of trees with a spatial aggregation index. We compared the structural metrics, species proportions, and stand age using the classes of structural naturalness described in the Finnish national forest inventory, which have been determined in the field without strict numerical rules. These categories are ‘natural’, ‘near-natural’, and ‘non-natural’. We found that the forests evaluated as structurally natural had larger variations in tree size and species composition and showed a more clustered spatial pattern of trees on average, although the variation in the structural metrics was considerable in all three classes. In addition, we used the structural metrics to predict naturalness by employing a random forest algorithm. Based on the structural metrics, it was possible to obtain high precision in the classification only if we simultaneously accepted low recall, and vice versa; the link between the inspected metrics and naturalness evaluated in the field was weak. The stand age separated the three classes more clearly and it also improved the classification.