Joanna Gotfrit, Macyn Leung, Horia Marginean, Daniel Kobewka, Dean Fergusson, Rachel Goodwin
{"title":"医学肿瘤学家的实践模式:门诊环境中预先护理计划的调查","authors":"Joanna Gotfrit, Macyn Leung, Horia Marginean, Daniel Kobewka, Dean Fergusson, Rachel Goodwin","doi":"10.1155/2023/3119940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Advance care planning (ACP) is an important part of cancer care. We determined the ACP practice patterns of medical oncologists at our academic cancer centre in Canada. Methods. Medical oncologists were invited to participate in a questionnaire in August 2019. Questions were validated by a local survey expert. Twelve multiple-choice questions were included. Results. Seventeen of the 23 eligible oncologists responded. 64% were male, and 76% were in practice for <16 years. Common tumour sites treated by respondents included breast (53%), lung (24%), gastrointestinal (24%), and genitourinary (24%) cancers. Oncologists responded that components of ACP included designating a substitute decision-maker (100%), determining goals of care (100%), making decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (94%), and disposition of property/finances (88%). They discuss ACP with curable vs. incurable patients 6% vs. 93% of the time. While 88% of oncologists reported it would be desirable to initiate ACP discussions in the first 3 visits, in the incurable setting, only 29% reported doing so. Patient characteristics that prompt oncologists to discuss ACP in the first 3 visits in the curative vs. incurable settings include elderly age (23% vs. 59%), poor performance status (47% vs. 88%), and short prognosis (47% vs. 88%). Oncologists thought the most appropriate time to discuss ACP in the curative setting was at the time the patient initiates it (35%), and during visits 2-3 in the incurable setting (41%). The most common barriers to discussing ACP include insufficient time (71%) and too much information for the patient (71%). Conclusions. While medical oncologists believe that discussing ACP with cancer patients in the first few outpatient visits is important, this seldom occurs due to the presence of several barriers.","PeriodicalId":11953,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Care","volume":"40 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practice Patterns of Medical Oncologists: A Survey of Advance Care Planning in the Outpatient Setting\",\"authors\":\"Joanna Gotfrit, Macyn Leung, Horia Marginean, Daniel Kobewka, Dean Fergusson, Rachel Goodwin\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2023/3119940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. Advance care planning (ACP) is an important part of cancer care. We determined the ACP practice patterns of medical oncologists at our academic cancer centre in Canada. Methods. Medical oncologists were invited to participate in a questionnaire in August 2019. Questions were validated by a local survey expert. Twelve multiple-choice questions were included. Results. Seventeen of the 23 eligible oncologists responded. 64% were male, and 76% were in practice for <16 years. Common tumour sites treated by respondents included breast (53%), lung (24%), gastrointestinal (24%), and genitourinary (24%) cancers. Oncologists responded that components of ACP included designating a substitute decision-maker (100%), determining goals of care (100%), making decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (94%), and disposition of property/finances (88%). They discuss ACP with curable vs. incurable patients 6% vs. 93% of the time. While 88% of oncologists reported it would be desirable to initiate ACP discussions in the first 3 visits, in the incurable setting, only 29% reported doing so. Patient characteristics that prompt oncologists to discuss ACP in the first 3 visits in the curative vs. incurable settings include elderly age (23% vs. 59%), poor performance status (47% vs. 88%), and short prognosis (47% vs. 88%). Oncologists thought the most appropriate time to discuss ACP in the curative setting was at the time the patient initiates it (35%), and during visits 2-3 in the incurable setting (41%). The most common barriers to discussing ACP include insufficient time (71%) and too much information for the patient (71%). Conclusions. While medical oncologists believe that discussing ACP with cancer patients in the first few outpatient visits is important, this seldom occurs due to the presence of several barriers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11953,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"volume\":\"40 2\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Cancer Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3119940\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/3119940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。提前护理计划(ACP)是癌症护理的重要组成部分。我们在加拿大的学术癌症中心确定了医学肿瘤学家的ACP实践模式。方法。医学肿瘤学家被邀请参加2019年8月的问卷调查。问题由当地调查专家验证。包括12道选择题。结果。23位符合条件的肿瘤学家中有17位做出了回应。其中64%为男性,76%从业16年。受访者治疗的常见肿瘤部位包括乳腺癌(53%)、肺癌(24%)、胃肠道(24%)和泌尿生殖系统(24%)癌症。肿瘤学家回答说,ACP的组成部分包括指定替代决策者(100%)、确定护理目标(100%)、做出心肺复苏决策(94%)和财产/财务处置(88%)。他们会和可治愈和无法治愈的病人讨论ACP分别是6%和93%虽然88%的肿瘤学家报告在前3次就诊时进行ACP讨论是可取的,但在无法治愈的情况下,只有29%的人报告这样做。促使肿瘤学家在前3次就诊时讨论ACP的患者特征包括:老年(23% vs. 59%)、表现不佳(47% vs. 88%)和预后短(47% vs. 88%)。肿瘤学家认为,在治愈的情况下讨论ACP最合适的时间是患者开始进行ACP的时候(35%),在无法治愈的情况下,在第2-3次就诊期间(41%)。讨论ACP最常见的障碍包括时间不足(71%)和患者信息过多(71%)。结论。虽然医学肿瘤学家认为,在最初的几次门诊中与癌症患者讨论ACP是很重要的,但由于存在一些障碍,这种情况很少发生。
Practice Patterns of Medical Oncologists: A Survey of Advance Care Planning in the Outpatient Setting
Introduction. Advance care planning (ACP) is an important part of cancer care. We determined the ACP practice patterns of medical oncologists at our academic cancer centre in Canada. Methods. Medical oncologists were invited to participate in a questionnaire in August 2019. Questions were validated by a local survey expert. Twelve multiple-choice questions were included. Results. Seventeen of the 23 eligible oncologists responded. 64% were male, and 76% were in practice for <16 years. Common tumour sites treated by respondents included breast (53%), lung (24%), gastrointestinal (24%), and genitourinary (24%) cancers. Oncologists responded that components of ACP included designating a substitute decision-maker (100%), determining goals of care (100%), making decisions about cardiopulmonary resuscitation (94%), and disposition of property/finances (88%). They discuss ACP with curable vs. incurable patients 6% vs. 93% of the time. While 88% of oncologists reported it would be desirable to initiate ACP discussions in the first 3 visits, in the incurable setting, only 29% reported doing so. Patient characteristics that prompt oncologists to discuss ACP in the first 3 visits in the curative vs. incurable settings include elderly age (23% vs. 59%), poor performance status (47% vs. 88%), and short prognosis (47% vs. 88%). Oncologists thought the most appropriate time to discuss ACP in the curative setting was at the time the patient initiates it (35%), and during visits 2-3 in the incurable setting (41%). The most common barriers to discussing ACP include insufficient time (71%) and too much information for the patient (71%). Conclusions. While medical oncologists believe that discussing ACP with cancer patients in the first few outpatient visits is important, this seldom occurs due to the presence of several barriers.
期刊介绍:
The European Journal of Cancer Care aims to encourage comprehensive, multiprofessional cancer care across Europe and internationally. It publishes original research reports, literature reviews, guest editorials, letters to the Editor and special features on current issues affecting the care of cancer patients. The Editor welcomes contributions which result from team working or collaboration between different health and social care providers, service users, patient groups and the voluntary sector in the areas of:
- Primary, secondary and tertiary care for cancer patients
- Multidisciplinary and service-user involvement in cancer care
- Rehabilitation, supportive, palliative and end of life care for cancer patients
- Policy, service development and healthcare evaluation in cancer care
- Psychosocial interventions for patients and family members
- International perspectives on cancer care