供应管理行业的贸易协定补偿

IF 2.5 2区 经济学 Q2 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
Ryan Cardwell, Scott Biden
{"title":"供应管理行业的贸易协定补偿","authors":"Ryan Cardwell,&nbsp;Scott Biden","doi":"10.1111/cjag.12337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Recent Canadian preferential trade agreements (PTAs) include increased market access for imports of supply-managed products (dairy and poultry). Such agreements are typically expected to create trade flows and increase supply of relatively low-priced products in Canada. Industry groups representing Canadian producers and processors of supply-managed products negotiated to receive approximately C$5 billion in payments from the federal government as compensation for the prospects of facing more international competition and reduced domestic sales. We discuss partial-equilibrium simulation models that are commonly used by academics and governments to project market effects of new trade agreements, and conceptually illustrate how different assumptions about import supply conditions generate different projected market outcomes. We focus on the quota fill rates of new access commitments—most studies, including those used to inform government policies on compensation payments, assume imports increase in an amount equal to new commitments. This is often not the case, including with recent Canadian trade agreements. We apply a conceptual framework to Canada's supply-management industry by re-simulating a quantitative model of the Canadian dairy industry with updated information on implementation and quota fill rates. Projected market effects of trade agreements under the assumption of full import quotas are markedly different from projections that account for unfilled quotas. We discuss the political economy and welfare implications of compensation payments in light of our analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":55291,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","volume":"72 3","pages":"271-283"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cjag.12337","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trade-agreement compensation in supply-managed industries\",\"authors\":\"Ryan Cardwell,&nbsp;Scott Biden\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cjag.12337\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Recent Canadian preferential trade agreements (PTAs) include increased market access for imports of supply-managed products (dairy and poultry). Such agreements are typically expected to create trade flows and increase supply of relatively low-priced products in Canada. Industry groups representing Canadian producers and processors of supply-managed products negotiated to receive approximately C$5 billion in payments from the federal government as compensation for the prospects of facing more international competition and reduced domestic sales. We discuss partial-equilibrium simulation models that are commonly used by academics and governments to project market effects of new trade agreements, and conceptually illustrate how different assumptions about import supply conditions generate different projected market outcomes. We focus on the quota fill rates of new access commitments—most studies, including those used to inform government policies on compensation payments, assume imports increase in an amount equal to new commitments. This is often not the case, including with recent Canadian trade agreements. We apply a conceptual framework to Canada's supply-management industry by re-simulating a quantitative model of the Canadian dairy industry with updated information on implementation and quota fill rates. Projected market effects of trade agreements under the assumption of full import quotas are markedly different from projections that account for unfilled quotas. We discuss the political economy and welfare implications of compensation payments in light of our analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55291,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie\",\"volume\":\"72 3\",\"pages\":\"271-283\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/cjag.12337\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cjag.12337\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics-Revue Canadienne D Agroeconomie","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cjag.12337","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的加拿大优惠贸易协定(PTAs)包括增加供应管理产品(乳制品和家禽)进口的市场准入。此类协定通常会创造贸易流动,增加加拿大相对低价产品的供应。代表加拿大供应管理产品生产商和加工商的行业团体通过谈判从联邦政府获得了约 50 亿加元的付款,作为对面临更多国际竞争和国内销售减少的前景的补偿。我们讨论了学术界和政府在预测新贸易协定的市场效应时常用的部分均衡模拟模型,并从概念上说明了对进口供应条件的不同假设如何产生不同的预测市场结果。我们将重点放在新准入承诺的配额填补率上--大多数研究,包括用于为政府补偿政策提供信息的研究,都假设进口量的增长与新承诺相等。但实际情况往往并非如此,加拿大最近的贸易协定也是如此。我们将概念框架应用于加拿大的供应管理行业,利用最新的实施信息和配额填补率重新模拟加拿大乳制品行业的定量模型。在全额进口配额的假设下,贸易协定的市场效应预测与未完成配额的预测明显不同。根据我们的分析,我们讨论了补偿金的政治经济和福利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Trade-agreement compensation in supply-managed industries

Trade-agreement compensation in supply-managed industries

Recent Canadian preferential trade agreements (PTAs) include increased market access for imports of supply-managed products (dairy and poultry). Such agreements are typically expected to create trade flows and increase supply of relatively low-priced products in Canada. Industry groups representing Canadian producers and processors of supply-managed products negotiated to receive approximately C$5 billion in payments from the federal government as compensation for the prospects of facing more international competition and reduced domestic sales. We discuss partial-equilibrium simulation models that are commonly used by academics and governments to project market effects of new trade agreements, and conceptually illustrate how different assumptions about import supply conditions generate different projected market outcomes. We focus on the quota fill rates of new access commitments—most studies, including those used to inform government policies on compensation payments, assume imports increase in an amount equal to new commitments. This is often not the case, including with recent Canadian trade agreements. We apply a conceptual framework to Canada's supply-management industry by re-simulating a quantitative model of the Canadian dairy industry with updated information on implementation and quota fill rates. Projected market effects of trade agreements under the assumption of full import quotas are markedly different from projections that account for unfilled quotas. We discuss the political economy and welfare implications of compensation payments in light of our analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
23.20
自引率
1.10%
发文量
19
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie (CJAE) serves as a platform for scholarly research in agricultural, resource, and environmental economics, covering topics such as agri-food, agri-business, policy, resource utilization, and environmental impacts. It publishes a range of theoretical, applied and policy-related articles.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信