从流动性风险到系统性风险:知识图谱的应用

IF 6.1 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Ren-Raw Chen , Xiaohu Zhang
{"title":"从流动性风险到系统性风险:知识图谱的应用","authors":"Ren-Raw Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaohu Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jfs.2023.101195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>In this paper, we use knowledge graph (KG) to study systemic risk in the banking industry. KG provides a graphic representation of the connections of entities of interest (known as vertices or nodes) with the strengths of connections being reflected by the lines connecting them (known as edges) or distances between them. As a result, KG is a natural tool for visualizing the relationships among </span>financial institutions<span>. Furthermore, various data and graph choices can present how differently entities of interest can be connected. In this paper, we draw KGs on two datasets: liquidity index and volatility and three different embedding methods: locally linear embedding, spectral embedding and principal component analysis. Our empirical results show, not surprisingly, that volatility and liquidity index are not similar in explaining how banks are connected. Embedding methods also matter.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48027,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Stability","volume":"70 ","pages":"Article 101195"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From liquidity risk to systemic risk: A use of knowledge graph\",\"authors\":\"Ren-Raw Chen ,&nbsp;Xiaohu Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jfs.2023.101195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>In this paper, we use knowledge graph (KG) to study systemic risk in the banking industry. KG provides a graphic representation of the connections of entities of interest (known as vertices or nodes) with the strengths of connections being reflected by the lines connecting them (known as edges) or distances between them. As a result, KG is a natural tool for visualizing the relationships among </span>financial institutions<span>. Furthermore, various data and graph choices can present how differently entities of interest can be connected. In this paper, we draw KGs on two datasets: liquidity index and volatility and three different embedding methods: locally linear embedding, spectral embedding and principal component analysis. Our empirical results show, not surprisingly, that volatility and liquidity index are not similar in explaining how banks are connected. Embedding methods also matter.</span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48027,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Financial Stability\",\"volume\":\"70 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Financial Stability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572308923000955\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Stability","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1572308923000955","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文运用知识图谱(KG)对银行业的系统性风险进行了研究。KG提供了感兴趣的实体(称为顶点或节点)的连接的图形表示,连接的强度通过连接它们的线(称为边)或它们之间的距离来反映。因此,KG是可视化金融机构之间关系的天然工具。此外,各种数据和图形选择可以表示如何连接不同的感兴趣实体。本文在流动性指数和波动率两个数据集上绘制了KGs,并采用了三种不同的嵌入方法:局部线性嵌入、谱嵌入和主成分分析。我们的实证结果表明,波动性和流动性指数在解释银行之间的联系时并不相似,这并不奇怪。嵌入方法也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From liquidity risk to systemic risk: A use of knowledge graph

In this paper, we use knowledge graph (KG) to study systemic risk in the banking industry. KG provides a graphic representation of the connections of entities of interest (known as vertices or nodes) with the strengths of connections being reflected by the lines connecting them (known as edges) or distances between them. As a result, KG is a natural tool for visualizing the relationships among financial institutions. Furthermore, various data and graph choices can present how differently entities of interest can be connected. In this paper, we draw KGs on two datasets: liquidity index and volatility and three different embedding methods: locally linear embedding, spectral embedding and principal component analysis. Our empirical results show, not surprisingly, that volatility and liquidity index are not similar in explaining how banks are connected. Embedding methods also matter.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
9.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Financial Stability provides an international forum for rigorous theoretical and empirical macro and micro economic and financial analysis of the causes, management, resolution and preventions of financial crises, including banking, securities market, payments and currency crises. The primary focus is on applied research that would be useful in affecting public policy with respect to financial stability. Thus, the Journal seeks to promote interaction among researchers, policy-makers and practitioners to identify potential risks to financial stability and develop means for preventing, mitigating or managing these risks both within and across countries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信