智能健康环境下个体隐私保护与自我跟踪行为预测

IF 7.6 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Jaewon Royce Choi , Seongcheol Kim
{"title":"智能健康环境下个体隐私保护与自我跟踪行为预测","authors":"Jaewon Royce Choi ,&nbsp;Seongcheol Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.tele.2023.102069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies faces social challenges, such as privacy and surveillance, in our so-called ‘sensor society.’ This study applies a unique theoretical framework of surveillance culture, consisting of the surveillance imaginary and surveillance practices, to comprehensively capture individual perceptions and behaviors related to privacy and surveillance in the context of smart health. We also conducted online surveys to examine the cross-national differences between South Korea and the US. Our results show that institutional trust and perceived comfort levels significantly predict individuals’ self-tracking behavior in both the US and Korean samples. Privacy concerns are significantly associated with individuals’ privacy protection behaviors for both samples. The cross-national differences between the US and South Korea are found to be statistically significant. A post-hoc analysis reveals that most differences are attributed to demographic and personal characteristics as predictors of the surveillance imaginary and surveillance practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48257,"journal":{"name":"Telematics and Informatics","volume":"86 ","pages":"Article 102069"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predicting individuals’ privacy protection and self-tracking behaviors in the context of smart health\",\"authors\":\"Jaewon Royce Choi ,&nbsp;Seongcheol Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tele.2023.102069\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies faces social challenges, such as privacy and surveillance, in our so-called ‘sensor society.’ This study applies a unique theoretical framework of surveillance culture, consisting of the surveillance imaginary and surveillance practices, to comprehensively capture individual perceptions and behaviors related to privacy and surveillance in the context of smart health. We also conducted online surveys to examine the cross-national differences between South Korea and the US. Our results show that institutional trust and perceived comfort levels significantly predict individuals’ self-tracking behavior in both the US and Korean samples. Privacy concerns are significantly associated with individuals’ privacy protection behaviors for both samples. The cross-national differences between the US and South Korea are found to be statistically significant. A post-hoc analysis reveals that most differences are attributed to demographic and personal characteristics as predictors of the surveillance imaginary and surveillance practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48257,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"volume\":\"86 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102069\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-11-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Telematics and Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585323001338\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Telematics and Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0736585323001338","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在我们所谓的“传感器社会”中,物联网(IoT)技术的实施面临着隐私和监控等社会挑战。“本研究采用了一个独特的监控文化理论框架,包括监控想象和监控实践,以全面捕捉智能健康背景下与隐私和监控相关的个人感知和行为。”我们还进行了在线调查,以检查韩国和美国之间的跨国差异。我们的研究结果表明,在美国和韩国的样本中,制度信任和感知舒适水平显著地预测了个体的自我跟踪行为。在两个样本中,隐私关注与个人隐私保护行为显著相关。美国和韩国之间的跨国差异在统计上是显著的。事后分析表明,大多数差异归因于人口统计学和个人特征,作为监视想象和监视实践的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predicting individuals’ privacy protection and self-tracking behaviors in the context of smart health

The implementation of Internet of Things (IoT) technologies faces social challenges, such as privacy and surveillance, in our so-called ‘sensor society.’ This study applies a unique theoretical framework of surveillance culture, consisting of the surveillance imaginary and surveillance practices, to comprehensively capture individual perceptions and behaviors related to privacy and surveillance in the context of smart health. We also conducted online surveys to examine the cross-national differences between South Korea and the US. Our results show that institutional trust and perceived comfort levels significantly predict individuals’ self-tracking behavior in both the US and Korean samples. Privacy concerns are significantly associated with individuals’ privacy protection behaviors for both samples. The cross-national differences between the US and South Korea are found to be statistically significant. A post-hoc analysis reveals that most differences are attributed to demographic and personal characteristics as predictors of the surveillance imaginary and surveillance practices.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Telematics and Informatics
Telematics and Informatics INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
4.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: Telematics and Informatics is an interdisciplinary journal that publishes cutting-edge theoretical and methodological research exploring the social, economic, geographic, political, and cultural impacts of digital technologies. It covers various application areas, such as smart cities, sensors, information fusion, digital society, IoT, cyber-physical technologies, privacy, knowledge management, distributed work, emergency response, mobile communications, health informatics, social media's psychosocial effects, ICT for sustainable development, blockchain, e-commerce, and e-government.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信