灵芝命名困境:被忽视和长期遗忘的名称威胁着命名的稳定性

IF 5.7 2区 生物学 Q1 MYCOLOGY
Viktor Papp
{"title":"灵芝命名困境:被忽视和长期遗忘的名称威胁着命名的稳定性","authors":"Viktor Papp","doi":"10.1016/j.fbr.2023.100338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Lingzhi mushroom is a species of great economic importance that has been extensively researched, yet there is still no consensus on its scientific name. In a recent article based on new taxonomic results, the authors argued for using the name <em>Ganoderma sichuanense</em> instead of <em>G. lingzhi</em>, which has been widely accepted by the scientific community in the last ten years. However, replacing a stable and popular name based on current results may exacerbate the crisis surrounding the correct name of this species. Therefore, my aim is to review the situation with respected to the name <em>G. sichuanense</em>. To achieve this, it is necessary to carefully review whether it is indeed the earliest valid scientific name that can be applied to the Lingzhi mushroom. Moreover, in the interest of nomenclatural stability, we must consider whether the earliest published basionym is the best choice for the scientific name of this economically and culturally significant fungal species. The urgent clarification of this issue is necessary because only a widely accepted name has the possibility to compete with the still widely but incorrectly used name <em>G. lucidum</em> in many publications and on medicinal products.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12563,"journal":{"name":"Fungal Biology Reviews","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100338"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1749461323000441/pdfft?md5=1ef558016f10f2dae4cf617877133dc7&pid=1-s2.0-S1749461323000441-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Lingzhi naming dilemma: Overlooked and long-forgotten names threaten nomenclatural stability\",\"authors\":\"Viktor Papp\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fbr.2023.100338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The Lingzhi mushroom is a species of great economic importance that has been extensively researched, yet there is still no consensus on its scientific name. In a recent article based on new taxonomic results, the authors argued for using the name <em>Ganoderma sichuanense</em> instead of <em>G. lingzhi</em>, which has been widely accepted by the scientific community in the last ten years. However, replacing a stable and popular name based on current results may exacerbate the crisis surrounding the correct name of this species. Therefore, my aim is to review the situation with respected to the name <em>G. sichuanense</em>. To achieve this, it is necessary to carefully review whether it is indeed the earliest valid scientific name that can be applied to the Lingzhi mushroom. Moreover, in the interest of nomenclatural stability, we must consider whether the earliest published basionym is the best choice for the scientific name of this economically and culturally significant fungal species. The urgent clarification of this issue is necessary because only a widely accepted name has the possibility to compete with the still widely but incorrectly used name <em>G. lucidum</em> in many publications and on medicinal products.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fungal Biology Reviews\",\"volume\":\"47 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100338\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-10-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1749461323000441/pdfft?md5=1ef558016f10f2dae4cf617877133dc7&pid=1-s2.0-S1749461323000441-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fungal Biology Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1749461323000441\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MYCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fungal Biology Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1749461323000441","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MYCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

灵芝是一种具有重要经济价值的物种,人们对其进行了广泛的研究,但对其学名仍未达成共识。在最近一篇根据新的分类结果撰写的文章中,作者主张使用灵芝(Ganoderma sichuanense)而不是灵芝(G. lingzhi),后者在过去十年中已被科学界广泛接受。然而,根据目前的结果来取代一个稳定而流行的名称,可能会加剧围绕该物种正确名称的危机。因此,我的目的是重新审视 G. sichuanense 这一名称的情况。为此,有必要仔细审查它是否确实是可用于灵芝蘑菇的最早有效学名。此外,为了保持命名的稳定性,我们必须考虑最早公布的学名是否是这一具有重要经济和文化意义的真菌物种学名的最佳选择。亟需澄清这一问题,因为只有一个被广泛接受的名称才有可能与许多出版物和药用产品中仍在广泛使用但使用不正确的名称灵芝(G. lucidum)相抗衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Lingzhi naming dilemma: Overlooked and long-forgotten names threaten nomenclatural stability

The Lingzhi mushroom is a species of great economic importance that has been extensively researched, yet there is still no consensus on its scientific name. In a recent article based on new taxonomic results, the authors argued for using the name Ganoderma sichuanense instead of G. lingzhi, which has been widely accepted by the scientific community in the last ten years. However, replacing a stable and popular name based on current results may exacerbate the crisis surrounding the correct name of this species. Therefore, my aim is to review the situation with respected to the name G. sichuanense. To achieve this, it is necessary to carefully review whether it is indeed the earliest valid scientific name that can be applied to the Lingzhi mushroom. Moreover, in the interest of nomenclatural stability, we must consider whether the earliest published basionym is the best choice for the scientific name of this economically and culturally significant fungal species. The urgent clarification of this issue is necessary because only a widely accepted name has the possibility to compete with the still widely but incorrectly used name G. lucidum in many publications and on medicinal products.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Fungal Biology Reviews is an international reviews journal, owned by the British Mycological Society. Its objective is to provide a forum for high quality review articles within fungal biology. It covers all fields of fungal biology, whether fundamental or applied, including fungal diversity, ecology, evolution, physiology and ecophysiology, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, cell biology, interactions (symbiosis, pathogenesis etc), environmental aspects, biotechnology and taxonomy. It considers aspects of all organisms historically or recently recognized as fungi, including lichen-fungi, microsporidia, oomycetes, slime moulds, stramenopiles, and yeasts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信