辅助生殖技术治疗期间亚裔和白种女性雌激素代谢差异的潜在机制探索性队列研究

Amy Kaing M.D. , Amanda Adeleye M.D. , Bani Tamraz Pharm.D., Ph.D. , Victor Y. Fujimoto M.D.
{"title":"辅助生殖技术治疗期间亚裔和白种女性雌激素代谢差异的潜在机制探索性队列研究","authors":"Amy Kaing M.D. ,&nbsp;Amanda Adeleye M.D. ,&nbsp;Bani Tamraz Pharm.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Victor Y. Fujimoto M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2023.10.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Explore whether racial differences in prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism underlies estrogen metabolism differences among Asians and Caucasians.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University-based fertility practice.</p></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><p>Asian or Caucasian patients who underwent ovarian stimulation (OS) or programmed cycle frozen embryo transfer (FET) between October 2019 and April 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><p>None.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><p>Trigger-day serum E2 per oocyte retrieved in OS cycles, and E2 on day of lining check in FET cycles.</p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>Seventy-one participants were enrolled, 55 in OS group (29 Caucasian and 26 Asian) and 16 in FET group (10 Caucasian and 6 Asian). Peak E2 per oocyte retrieved in the OS group (n = 48) differed by race, with significantly lower levels in Caucasians compared with Asians (177.5 ± 64.2 vs. 261.1 ± 139.5 pg/mL). Prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism did not significantly differ by race. Compared using Kruskal–Wallis test, peak E2 per oocyte retrieved did not differ by CYP1A2∗1F genotype. In multivariate linear regression model, adjusting for body mass index, caffeine intake, and self-reported race, there remained no significant correlation. In FET group, serum E2 on day of lining check was also not significantly different by CYP1A2∗1F genotype.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>Although a consistent difference in serum E2 between Asians and Caucasians undergoing OS was noted, the CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism is unlikely the primary driver of this difference.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"4 4","pages":"Pages 396-401"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334123001046/pdfft?md5=9b0ab43a7e6d97c38ca417f79bfa939d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666334123001046-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploratory cohort study into underlying mechanism of differences in estrogen metabolism between Asian and Caucasian women during assisted reproductive technology treatment\",\"authors\":\"Amy Kaing M.D. ,&nbsp;Amanda Adeleye M.D. ,&nbsp;Bani Tamraz Pharm.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Victor Y. Fujimoto M.D.\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.xfre.2023.10.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Explore whether racial differences in prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism underlies estrogen metabolism differences among Asians and Caucasians.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Prospective cohort study.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>University-based fertility practice.</p></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><p>Asian or Caucasian patients who underwent ovarian stimulation (OS) or programmed cycle frozen embryo transfer (FET) between October 2019 and April 2021.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><p>None.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><p>Trigger-day serum E2 per oocyte retrieved in OS cycles, and E2 on day of lining check in FET cycles.</p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>Seventy-one participants were enrolled, 55 in OS group (29 Caucasian and 26 Asian) and 16 in FET group (10 Caucasian and 6 Asian). Peak E2 per oocyte retrieved in the OS group (n = 48) differed by race, with significantly lower levels in Caucasians compared with Asians (177.5 ± 64.2 vs. 261.1 ± 139.5 pg/mL). Prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism did not significantly differ by race. Compared using Kruskal–Wallis test, peak E2 per oocyte retrieved did not differ by CYP1A2∗1F genotype. In multivariate linear regression model, adjusting for body mass index, caffeine intake, and self-reported race, there remained no significant correlation. In FET group, serum E2 on day of lining check was also not significantly different by CYP1A2∗1F genotype.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>Although a consistent difference in serum E2 between Asians and Caucasians undergoing OS was noted, the CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism is unlikely the primary driver of this difference.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34409,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"FS Reports\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 396-401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334123001046/pdfft?md5=9b0ab43a7e6d97c38ca417f79bfa939d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666334123001046-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"FS Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334123001046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334123001046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的 探讨CYP1A2∗1F多态性的种族差异是否是亚洲人和白种人雌激素代谢差异的基础.设计前瞻性队列研究.设置基于大学的生育实践.患者(S)在2019年10月至2021年4月期间接受卵巢刺激(OS)或程序周期冷冻胚胎移植(FET)的亚洲或白种人患者.干预措施:无。主要结果测量指标:OS周期中每个取回的卵母细胞触发日血清E2,FET周期中内膜检查日血清E2。结果:71名参与者入组,其中OS组55人(29名白种人和26名亚裔人),FET组16人(10名白种人和6名亚裔人)。OS组(n = 48)每个取回的卵母细胞的E2峰值因种族而异,白种人的E2水平明显低于亚洲人(177.5 ± 64.2 vs. 261.1 ± 139.5 pg/mL)。CYP1A2∗1F多态性的发生率在种族上没有明显差异。使用 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行比较,CYP1A2∗1F 基因型不同,取回的每个卵母细胞的 E2 峰值也不同。在多变量线性回归模型中,对体重指数、咖啡因摄入量和自我报告的种族进行调整后,仍然没有发现明显的相关性。结论:虽然接受 OS 的亚洲人和白种人的血清 E2 存在一致的差异,但 CYP1A2∗1F 多态性不太可能是造成这种差异的主要原因。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploratory cohort study into underlying mechanism of differences in estrogen metabolism between Asian and Caucasian women during assisted reproductive technology treatment

Objective

Explore whether racial differences in prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism underlies estrogen metabolism differences among Asians and Caucasians.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

University-based fertility practice.

Patient(s)

Asian or Caucasian patients who underwent ovarian stimulation (OS) or programmed cycle frozen embryo transfer (FET) between October 2019 and April 2021.

Intervention(s)

None.

Main Outcome Measure(s)

Trigger-day serum E2 per oocyte retrieved in OS cycles, and E2 on day of lining check in FET cycles.

Result(s)

Seventy-one participants were enrolled, 55 in OS group (29 Caucasian and 26 Asian) and 16 in FET group (10 Caucasian and 6 Asian). Peak E2 per oocyte retrieved in the OS group (n = 48) differed by race, with significantly lower levels in Caucasians compared with Asians (177.5 ± 64.2 vs. 261.1 ± 139.5 pg/mL). Prevalence of CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism did not significantly differ by race. Compared using Kruskal–Wallis test, peak E2 per oocyte retrieved did not differ by CYP1A2∗1F genotype. In multivariate linear regression model, adjusting for body mass index, caffeine intake, and self-reported race, there remained no significant correlation. In FET group, serum E2 on day of lining check was also not significantly different by CYP1A2∗1F genotype.

Conclusion(s)

Although a consistent difference in serum E2 between Asians and Caucasians undergoing OS was noted, the CYP1A2∗1F polymorphism is unlikely the primary driver of this difference.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
FS Reports
FS Reports Medicine-Embryology
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
78
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信